Originally Posted by
Kaz
Winter's system didn't work because he played it the same way.... he allowed for very little creativity, didn't spend enough time in the right area's and didn't build a strong enough back line.
What Winter did was basically the reverse of Preki. (not completely but close, attacking without strong defence, but that was a failure in players and coaching not in style)
Several clubs can make 4-3-3 work.
The players are there, the players are there to be developed. as well. If they work on 4-3-3 with creativity and that can just as easily go through the centre, as the wings, as well as long ball it from time to time, and can effectively defend a counter attack, set pieces, then you are set.
That is where Winter failed.. he developed a team that was week on set pieces, struggled on counters, and attacked almost exclusively from the wings. It wasn't the 4-3-3 it was the coach... and if it was the players it is still the coach because he brought them in, or allowed them to be brought in. Because Winter never adjusted his style, never modified it for the players, he stuck to his plan. It was like trying to defend a city like it had functional fortifications while those fortifications were still being built.
If we get a decent CB out of all this, and lose 2-3 defenders in the off season, and bring in a replacement for Soolsma, get Plata Back, and some back up in the DM and back up for Koevs. Then the 4-3-3 can be brought back without issue.
Though I don't think Winter's system was ready to be used... he should have been put in charge of the academy and brought Mariner to Coach the first time for a few years while the academy was developing the players to fit this system and then put Winter in Charge, 3-4 years down the road. Even then I'm not so sure.