The east and west will have some sort of wind screen behind them i believe but at this point who knows.
When it rains some people will stay dry but a fair number will still get wet, i just hope the configuration doesn't turn bmo into a wind tunnel.
The east and west will have some sort of wind screen behind them i believe but at this point who knows.
When it rains some people will stay dry but a fair number will still get wet, i just hope the configuration doesn't turn bmo into a wind tunnel.
The financial impact isn't a big deal. That's a fact. The benefit to Toronto is less about money than exposure. The attention this stadium will garner as being a home for the Grey Cup will help the terrible image for the club that lives here. But ratings are incredible across Canada.
Ratings for the events are undeniably great thanks to the rest of Canada outside the GTA.
FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER
I watched part of the Grey Cup.
More so than the grey cup those temp seats are for the winter classic during the leafs centennial season.
The CFL is doing very well in other markets. For some of those cities, these CFL teams are either the only ticket in town or they have found their niche and are catering to their market quite nicely.
The Argos fan base is getting older. Aside from the children of those who are currently Argo fans, there are not many new fans rallying to the club.
The same fans who didn't enjoy the games at old exhibition stadium are the same fans that are carrying this teams attendance. Only now, they are much older and less accepting to being exposed to the elements. Hell, that was one of the reasons they moved from Exhibition Stadium - the elements were too much for the fan base to endure!
Moving the Argos to BMO field is a bad move for the Argos fan base. Sure the younger generation will love it, but they make up a small portion of the overall Argos fan base
Look at the stadium renderings. the wind will blow right through that thing. It will still be cold as hell in there.
.
Maybe the mistake by the lake (Argo fan lingo from way back) MKll, will be the final nail in the coffin of the good ship Argonaut.
The Argos will never fold so long as Bell owns them. They're the loss-leader for TSN broadcasts and CFL relevancy as a national league. Remember why the CSA hasn't announced a Canadian soccer league yet like they were supposed to? They can't find investors for Toronto and Vancouver, so they figure its not viable without those two markets. It's the same with the CFL and the Argos.
They should've hooked up with a University and built a small stadium that catered to their market. Instead they are running around trying to feed off the success of other brands, hoping that will inject new energy into the club. It's a lazy recipe from an incompetent ownership.
We'll see how the roof plays a factor with the elements. But from what I'm seeing, and what was said in the town hall meetings, that stadium was built with the idea of having winds travel through the stadium in order to help with grass growth.
Agreed, the ratings are higher than a TFC game shit pretty much anything is higher than a MLS game let alone a TFC game, but if you go and breakdown the demographics of who watches the CFL it is significantly older then all other sports in Canada... Go to any sporting event in the city and you can see that TFC, Marlies & Raptors have the youngest fan bases and the Jays are starting to get younger fans.
Also, I am not denying the economic impact of the game.
For the record I'm not arguing about economic impact of hosting the game. My point is the
The roof on the east side does actually meet the back of the grandstand. The west side is another story all together. I don't know if the gap is to make it easier to rebuild or modify the west side the gap appears to be quite big.
It will be terrible for television as (as with Philadelphia), we'll end up with the shadow of the roof on the pitch, then a sunlit gap and then the shadow of the stand. It will visually awful.
We are and we aren't! MLSE does not own the Argonauts. Two of the owners of MLSE own the Argonauts. It's not quite the same and the current situation will not be quite as advantageous to the Argos as it would have been if MLSE owned the club. Rogers held out and are, or so I've heard, doing their best to ensure that the Argos do not get any sweetheart deals. I doubt we'll ever know if they do or don't.
Exactly!
If Rogers (Scumbags that they are!) could have made a buck from the Argos purchase they would have been involved with it the way Bell and Tannenbaum are.
But make no mistake - this Argos purchase was done for one thing - TSN. Its not about making a profit (the Argos WILL CONTINUE to be a sinkhole) - its about protecting Bell's investment in the CFL as TSN's number one programming asset. No Toronto team impacts the profitability of TSN's CFL programming. Period.
Actually it will probably all be down to Rogers to make sure that MLSE does not roll over for the Argos and screw up the Argos tenancy at BMO for TFC.
Need a full time security guard for this thread.
There are some actual BMO field construction pictures over at the Argo forums (good photo from the southwest corner). I dare say they are doing a better job in their BMO field construction thread.