Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Garber says "no" to increased roster size

    MLS commissioner Don Garber has essentially slammed the book on any expansion of squad sizes in the imminent future by reasoning that the money needed is simply not in league coffers yet.

    Much has been made of poor league showings in international cups, with many observers laying a lion's share of the blame on restrictive senior rosters - but Garber insists enlarging them will come in its own fiscal time.
    http://www.soccer365.com/us_news/story_21008150419.php
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    4,365
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bastard.

    EDIT: Garber, not you Oldtimer.

  3. #3
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cashcleaner says "Balls" to Garber latest comments regarding MLS roster sizes.

    Seriously ladies and gents, MLS is a business first and foremost and a sports league as a secondary consideration. Garber is doing his best to make money to satisfy short term demands. Looking ahead at the future of the league in five or ten years just isn't in their mandate.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    York, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Were is Rudi to again defend the visionary named Garber? This man took the league from the stone ages to the middle ages, maybe. But he is a completely incompetent fool and it's only because no one cares about this forth rate league that it hasn't been exposed in every media channel.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    York, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashcleaner View Post
    Cashcleaner says "Balls" to Garber latest comments regarding MLS roster sizes.

    Seriously ladies and gents, MLS is a business first and foremost and a sports league as a secondary consideration. Garber is doing his best to make money to satisfy short term demands. Looking ahead at the future of the league in five or ten years just isn't in their mandate.

    Sweaty Balls.

  6. #6
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Actually, I will defend the fact that Garber did do quite a bit to expand the interest of the league and the sport during some pretty tough times,

    BUT...

    Nowadays, he's become redundant as a commissioner. We don't need to spread the word of MLS in the same manner as he knows because the organisation has already become well-known to the existing soccer crowd in Canada and the USA, and has been somewhat imprinted in the minds of non-soccer fans as well.

    Basically, Garber is a salesman. Up until recently, MLS certainly needed one, but now we need an administrator.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    1,704
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    With all but three teams making a profit. When do we start asking about the longevity of this league? When is it going to be all teams make a profit, except for three? This is not sustainable. (assuming they're telling the truth).

  8. #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    First, they aren't telling the truth, they are only losing money after they write off everything mathematically possible, including the depreciation of players. Second, of course they have the money, I mean if the fucking WOMEN'S LEAGUE, the WPS, has a higher salary cap than the MLS, they have to have the money somewhere!
    Quote Originally Posted by Gazza View Post
    I had my first King Dave experience[...]was blowing in my mouth all game.

    I loved it, it tasted like Canada!

  9. #9
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ And the USL has no Salary Cap as far as I'm aware.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  10. #10
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This was to be expected. Not hoped for , but expected. For him to say yes to more roster spots before he sits down with the players to discuss salary would compound problems between himself and owners of teams.

    On the other hand, he may have instituted more roster spots and pointed to the fact at the negotiations next year (or 2010?)

    Anyway he's taken the conservative route here so he doesn't stress the league with more roster spots AND higher salaries.

    But I know I'm not alone in wanting both.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ossington Ave
    Posts
    8,607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    More of the same next year, no schedule change, no roster change, prob no cap change and no salary change.
    Miserable miserable miserable.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ossington Ave
    Posts
    8,607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thinking small scale.
    Putting the fucking Superleague over the CL.
    Small time and amateur.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scarlem
    Posts
    1,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashcleaner View Post
    ^ And the USL has no Salary Cap as far as I'm aware.
    Actually I think it does, although I'm not sure how high the USL cap is. At any rate, USL rosters have greater depth and are much stronger than MLS teams in international competitions, despite having lower payrolls. If USL teams can have depth with nickel-and-dime budgets, then MLS and Garber have no excuse.

    Relating to this roster issue, I'm beginning to wonder whether Montreal and Vancouver should even consider bidding for MLS entry. Aside from greater attendance figures, would the Impact and Whitecaps actually improve on the pitch in MLS?

  14. #14
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ My bad if I'm wrong about the USL cap. But you make a good point about their rosters. They're actually very professional squads with depth and a staff that knows how to thrive in a continent where soccer is far from the number 1 sport.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    1,312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    USL does not have a salary cap. As I understand it, the league works with the teams (or at least the one's without billionaire owners) to ensure that they are operating under a realistic budget. Very few (if any) teams in USL are making money on operations but no one is taking a bath either.

    the more I read about USL and learn about the league, I'm really impressed and wonder who different the situation would have been here in Toronto if the Lynx were owned by serious people with deep pockets and good soccer business sense, rather than the con artists we were stuck with.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    West Siiiiide
    Posts
    24,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bringing Beckham was a big mistake if the league is not willing to start playing with the big boys. Garber is essentially admitting they are not ready to be a real top league if this is the case. An 18-man roster and a $2million roster size is child's play in the world of soccer, and that would make MLS a junior league.

    They are running out of time to capitalize as much as they can on the Beckham effect.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scarlem
    Posts
    1,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VPjr View Post
    USL does not have a salary cap. As I understand it, the league works with the teams (or at least the one's without billionaire owners) to ensure that they are operating under a realistic budget. Very few (if any) teams in USL are making money on operations but no one is taking a bath either.

    the more I read about USL and learn about the league, I'm really impressed and wonder who different the situation would have been here in Toronto if the Lynx were owned by serious people with deep pockets and good soccer business sense, rather than the con artists we were stuck with.
    I stand corrected. I thought I read somewhere that USL had a cap, but I guess it was a mistake. I guess the USL salary structure only simulates what would be expected under a cap.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    16,746
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fucking CFL cap is $4.7 million, and it's an eight team, Canada-only league!

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scarlem
    Posts
    1,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jloome View Post
    Fucking CFL cap is $4.7 million, and it's an eight team, Canada-only league!
    True, but CFL teams 46-player rosters. A maximum payroll of $4.7 million would still be spread thin amongst that group.

  20. #20
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pape and Danforth
    Posts
    1,797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Garber isn't capitalizing on the league's obvious window of expansion. These years are crucial to the development of the league, and Garber seems to be holding the league back from ever becoming more than a afterthought in the world of football. If the league wants to gain respectability around the world, then Garber needs to step down. Sometimes you must take a risk in order for there to be any progression, and Garber seems to be scared to take that risk.
    Last edited by Keyman; 10-04-2008 at 12:34 AM.


  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scarlem
    Posts
    1,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 125_TFC View Post
    Garber isn't capitalizing on the league's obvious window of expansion. These years are crucial to the development of the league, and Garber seems to be holding the league back from ever becoming more than a afterthought in the world of football. If the league wants to gain respectability around the world, then Garber needs to step down. Sometimes you must take a risk in order for their to be any progression, and Garber seems to be scared to take that risk.
    Agreed. Garber is running MLS as if its 1996. Teams in this league don't need to be coddled any more. So many questionable and archaic rules are holding back progress in this league.

  22. #22
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pape and Danforth
    Posts
    1,797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toronto Ruffrider View Post
    Agreed. Garber is running MLS as if its 1996. Teams in this league don't need to be coddled any more. So many questionable and archaic rules are holding back progress in this league.
    Exactly, I understand where Garber is coming from, but he simply has become too conservative for the league. There still has to be obvious control, however, the amount of restrictions on teams right now is ridiculous and not needed. At some point, there has to be a gap between the rich and the poor. Continued equality in a sports league rarely works.


  23. #23
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kettering, OH
    Posts
    2,473
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If Garber were a smart gent he would have used the excuse of '4 expansion clubs in the next 3 years' ploy. That I could swallow for not expanding squads due to the demand for players in the next few years and trying to balance US player development with foreign investments without thinning the talent pool.
    But he didn't.

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    York, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 125_TFC View Post
    Exactly, I understand where Garber is coming from, but he simply has become too conservative for the league. There still has to be obvious control, however, the amount of restrictions on teams right now is ridiculous and not needed. At some point, there has to be a gap between the rich and the poor. Continued equality in a sports league rarely works.
    Actually it has worked extremely successfully with the NFL. I know you said 'rarely' but the NFL model has been a resounding success. And this is the problem, Garber came form NFL Europe and has been trained by that system. The core issue that I have with Garber is the consistent paradoxes in his plans. He professes slow and steady growth, but the creates the "Beckham Rule" when the opportunity transpired. He wants new clubs with SSS and then awards franchises to those who don't have SSS.

    He is an exceptionally poor marketer of the league as well. He wasn't able to sell the league on the entertainment value and general football merits, so he did EXACTLY what the NASL did and signed a "Pele" and thus we have the LA "Cosmos". The multimedia elements for the MLS is considerable below par, he simply does not realise that the web is an outstanding sales tool. The MLS website is so poor for a professional league it's baffling. He is proud of the fact that "The league now sells more than it buys in the transfer market" as a way to make it financially viable. So in essence he is running an MLS/US Development league allowing players in low level teams and tier two leagues to be supplied with players. He may have a long term plan, but so did NFL Europe. (RIP in 2007)

    He is a dinosaur in the new world of sport. He believes the archaic disciplined approach will build a 'major league'. If this is the case, then it won't be in my lifetime or his as long as he is in charge. Just my thoughts.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    in your head
    Posts
    9,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 125_TFC View Post
    At some point, there has to be a gap between the rich and the poor. Continued equality in a sports league rarely works.
    explain this statement to me... what league with continued equality hasn't worked?

    i agree with removing some of the restrictions that are redundant, but not the salary cap. that is essential. if we allow teams to spend anything, then we become a league like any other -- winning becomes a product of spending capacity, which is uneven (not all markets are equal).

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •