Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default MLS considering simplifying salary "cap" (budget rules)

    https://wakingthered.com/2023/07/29/...ome-world-cup/

    Talking about changes, up to instituting a regular salary cap.

    Will MLS actually remove the training wheels?

  2. #2
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting that there's widespread fudging of the budget rules.

    When the Bundesliga hit the same stage of growth from niche to mainstream in the 1970's as football became more popular in West Germany (gaining on Germany's traditional sport of gymnastics) they removed most of their complex rules because teams weren't respecting them anyway. Maybe MLS is at the same point.
    Last edited by Oldtimer; 07-30-2023 at 11:25 AM.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    North York ON
    Posts
    1,101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Loosen for sure, but don't let this league become Europe. Those leagues are all broken and will never be repaired, whatever we do we need to preserve at least most of the parity that exists. There should not be clubs that know today that, bar being bought out by a sports washing human rights denier, they are ruled out of ever winning. I'd rather watch a league way off those in quality but preserving that than a league just rotating which 3 teams win for the next 20 years, even if we're more likely than not one of those big teams rather than an also ran

  4. #4
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,833
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like the idea of a hard cap but where apart from the DP's, you have a bucket you can spend that has to include x no of players. Let the cheapskates cheap out and let players just be players.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    5,852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would like for transfer fees not to count against the cap. Just salaries.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    3,239
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    $50million straight cap or $25million cap plus 3DPs rule plus U23s initiative. However, the limiting factor is wage inflation for domestic players that aren't worth as much on the open market. They should remove the limit on international players and institute a minimum 3 domestic players per team be on the pitch at all times during a game. The league is large enough now that they will still have 90 domestics playing per matchweek, but players will be forced to increase their intensity and skill if the want to see game minutes.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    11,699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeForbes View Post
    I would like for transfer fees not to count against the cap. Just salaries.
    Agreed.

  8. #8
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^While relaxing domestic rules and allowing a big budget for hiring the best would improve the product, the problem is that MLS has to please the USSF (the CSA not so much) so it's not going to happen. Developing domestic players is an important function of MLS.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    16,946
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldtimer View Post
    ^^While relaxing domestic rules and allowing a big budget for hiring the best would improve the product, the problem is that MLS has to please the USSF (the CSA not so much) so it's not going to happen. Developing domestic players is an important function of MLS.
    Based on the comments from some of the owners after Miami's Jorge Mas suggested lifting it, I can only see them increasing the base and possibly the number of DP and TAM, maybe getting rid of some of the protectionist player claiming shit.

    Basically, I think they'll go up by quite a bit but it won't be anything like getting rid of the cap or going to a free transfer system.

    I can see them looking at the $40M plus payrolls for Mexican league and secondary European clubs though and seeing that as the top end. LAFC and TFC are already two thirds of the way there anyway.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •