Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910
Results 271 to 292 of 292
  1. #271
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoesphNdo View Post
    For sure, but sadly that isn't how they'd look at it, though, since that appreciation would have happened even if they didn't flush money down the toilet. They've made money on TFC, no doubt, but they've lost a fortune on their investment in the playing squad (Since, again, the appreciation would have happened anyway) and other owners, as we've seen in the league, would be more likely to pocket the appreciation and not invest in the team. There's some exceptions to that, but we have to acknowledge that MLSE are the absolute top owners in the league in terms of their willingness to throw money at the first team without ROI, that isn't nothing and is not something we could just expect any other owners to replicate

    It's like if your house tripled in value because you bought it in a rapidly appreciating neighbourhood but you spent a fortune installing a gold toilet that doesn't work. You're up on the investment overall, but you threw money away on that gold toilet and you'd look at it as such
    Yeah don't disagree that it's not a license to spend stupidly but, although I'm no expert, a lot is tied to the team valuation (executive bonuses, access to capital, etc). We should be demanding TFC is amongst the top spending teams in the league.

  2. #272
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    3,239
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NK Toronto View Post
    Looking back at the history of this club there have been a lot more bad hires then good ones. I think we have to acknowledge that 2015 to 2018 was a fluke, an outlier. Even a blind squirrel finds the occasional nut. In Tim Lieweke MLSE had a bold visionary as a CEO, but someone who the board could not control, which is why his tenure was very short. Its no accident that after Lieweke they hired a bean counter as a CEO, and after the bean counter left they hired no one. I am willing to wager that even though Manning is useless as a president, he is brilliant in the boardroom. Says all the right things, gets along, does what he is told, and is easily controllable. A sycophant yes man, which is what the board wants. This is why there will never be another Lieweke type hire.
    This. THIS! So much this! The only thing that MLSE cares about is being a success financially (which it is). It doesn't care about on-the-field/rink/court success, because to them that doesn't affect the cash flow (until it does).

  3. #273
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So now that MLsE has a new CEO, maybe he can take it upon himself to take out the trash.

  4. #274
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Even less likely then before


    a) Pelley's a CFL guy - Manning's best work is the Argos

    b) he's seen as both Bell & Rogers and won't want to make a move just to give one side an up - so every major change that the board would be involved in is going to be extremely vetted - he ain't doing a whim thing early or mid season

  5. #275
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    FOOTBALLISLIFE
    Posts
    3,410
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^
    Probably. Yet, KP also, supposedly successfully, since the jury seems to still be out, spent more than half a year assisting to negotiate an extremely complex deal with the KSA’s PIF regarding PGA/LIV. So, similar to the CHGroup sitch, or in preferred investment lieu of, MLSE, business parts of, or investor factions of, may view him as a conduit to another potential suitor or backer for any 2026 circumstances.
    Last edited by Mr. Inbetween; 01-10-2024 at 11:00 PM.

  6. #276
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    FOOTBALLISLIFE
    Posts
    3,410
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BTW, it is not understood, for the moment, whether any/all of the MLSE sports presidents will even report directly to KP, or as in the case when MF was in the role, still only report directly to company’s board of directors.

    ‘It’s unclear whether Masai Ujiri and Brendan Shanahan, presidents of the Raptors and Maple Leafs, respectively, will report to Pelley. During Friisdahl’s tenure as MLSE president from 2015-2022, Ujiri and Shanahan reported directly to MLSE’s board of directors. That effectively made the CEO position one that oversaw legal, sponsorship, and human resources issues for the company, rather than team personnel decisions.’

    https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/mlse-to-hire-...tive-1.2060702


  7. #277
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Even less likely then before


    a) Pelley's a CFL guy - Manning's best work is the Argos

    b) he's seen as both Bell & Rogers and won't want to make a move just to give one side an up - so every major change that the board would be involved in is going to be extremely vetted - he ain't doing a whim thing early or mid season
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Manning’s contract is up in 12 months. Would seem to me like a no-brainer not to renew.

    I would hope Pelley has enough businesses sense in him to see TFC is the biggest potential growth asset in the MLSE stable right now. Manning’s underperformce is hurting the team’s prospects. And the Argos are (and always will be) small potatoes.

  8. #278
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ag futbol View Post
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Manning’s contract is up in 12 months. Would seem to me like a no-brainer not to renew.

    I would hope Pelley has enough businesses sense in him to see TFC is the biggest potential growth asset in the MLSE stable right now. Manning’s underperformce is hurting the team’s prospects. And the Argos are (and always will be) small potatoes.
    Nope! ML$E is going to make the Argos more front and center at BMO Field, while TFC gets the shit end of whatever they give them.

    The deadbeats have become the golden child, as far as ML$E is concerned.
    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  9. #279
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    North York ON
    Posts
    1,101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think MLSE has ever, or will ever, care much about the argos tbh. The revenue growth potential just is not there, which is all they care about. You can see it in how little effort they put into the team, I live near BMO field and I don't know if I've seen mention of the team anywhere since they moved in - they do less than nothing to promote the team. If I didn't follow sports I think there's a reasonable chance I wouldn't be aware they play in BMO field. Of all my worries about TFC going forward, them suddenly deciding to push the argos isn't there. I could see 'completely giving up on TFC and running us on a tight budget to eek out a small profit every year and forget about us' and us reverting into a Chicago style operation as a valid worst case scenario, but I just can't see them suddenly deciding the Argos are the path to making money

  10. #280
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoesphNdo View Post
    I don't think MLSE has ever, or will ever, care much about the argos tbh. The revenue growth potential just is not there, which is all they care about. You can see it in how little effort they put into the team, I live near BMO field and I don't know if I've seen mention of the team anywhere since they moved in - they do less than nothing to promote the team. If I didn't follow sports I think there's a reasonable chance I wouldn't be aware they play in BMO field. Of all my worries about TFC going forward, them suddenly deciding to push the argos isn't there. I could see 'completely giving up on TFC and running us on a tight budget to eek out a small profit every year and forget about us' and us reverting into a Chicago style operation as a valid worst case scenario, but I just can't see them suddenly deciding the Argos are the path to making money
    Totally fair. My broad take is we’ve reached “peak” sports. Valuations for teams are ridiculous and not justifiable. If I were a board member, i’d be encouraging the management team to look at a sale

  11. #281
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redcoe15 View Post
    Nope! ML$E is going to make the Argos more front and center at BMO Field, while TFC gets the shit end of whatever they give them.

    The deadbeats have become the golden child, as far as ML$E is concerned.
    This is not true, based on franchise value alone. I think MLSE is pretty aware something they paid $10 million for is now fetching $300 million (and TFC has been valued at double that). They will not let that team value erode.

  12. #282
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    North York ON
    Posts
    1,101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canary10 View Post
    This is not true, based on franchise value alone. I think MLSE is pretty aware something they paid $10 million for is now fetching $300 million (and TFC has been valued at double that). They will not let that team value erode.
    It's worth even more than that, at a minimum, it's $500m usd for a franchise now, so we're worth that + whatever other assets and advantages we have on top, which there's quite a bit of

    The only problem is, basically none of that growth is due to any of the money they put into the team. They could have run us on a shoestring budget, saved themselves alot of money, and not really lost most of the gains. So while their ROI overall on us is positive, their ROI on the operating costs of the team - especially since Bez left - is horrifically in the negative. And the reality is cutting costs will not erode the value of the team much, since the strenght of our current squad plays very little in that valutation, and our attendance is likely to dwindle as is

    That doesn't mean it's doom and gloom, just we should look at this how MLSE will look at this. Just making a tonne of money on the initial investment doesn't necessarily mean they'll pump more into the team. They'll only do that if they see growth potential, return on that spend - it's not, and never is, about how much a thing is worth it's about the difference between what it's worth today and what it could be worth tomorrow (And this difference is why they don't spend on the Argos, despite good tv numbers). If they think spending that money now results in better attendance, merch, apple revenue, whatever than they would get just sitting on their hands. Previously, they believed that, and hopefully they still do, but Bill Mannings black bit of their money and a new president coming in will definitely bring up an uncomfortable (for us) conversation

  13. #283
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some thoughts on MLSE re:Argos/TFC:

    CFL/Argos:


    • For TSN, the CFL's TV deal is massive for them. Gives them plenty of air time to fill with live Canadian sports (which advertisers love, as people don't PVR them as much). This helps counter what Sportsnet has in the Jays for the Summer.
    • Without a team in Toronto (Argos), the CFL TV rights and the CFL as a property are servery diminished, as the Argos get the best Eastern ratings of them all.
    • Bell/TSN NEEDS the Argos for the TV property. They aren't selling.
    • The CFL has like a salary cap of 5ish million, and a Front Office/Coaching cap as well. So like they spend, max, 15 million on them - one DP. Nothing to be worried about as a TFC fan.


    TFC:


    • My opinion on what MLSE sees in TFC hasn't changed. TFC is the one team/brand that has ALL the growth potential. Leafs/Raps/Argos have all tapped out on their growth. How much bigger can they get? Yeah, I know, TV deals. But that is a league question and they are pretty maxed out.
    • I think MLSE wants to keep TFC's brand strong. I know that TFC has been bad from the last couple of years, but who is really keeping track of how good they have been? True the hard core TFC fans (this board) and their supporters, but to causal fans they are the team that buys big time players. And that is what keeps their brand going in Europe and with Football fans throughout the world.
    • MLS is going to have a reckoning soon on what type of league they want to be. Is it going to be a world class league with world class players in their prime or a retirement league with lower quality players?
    • There has been talk about working more with Liga MX (there are tournaments already) and I see them eventually merging with them to create a North American Premiere League and I think it will be tiered.
    • MLSE needs to keep TFC's brand strong for when that day comes - which I actually think will come quicker than not. The TV money is in the NAPL.
    • That is how you get the value up to a Billion Dollars.
    • Again, nothing to worry about if you are a TFC supporter.


    Thank you for reading!

  14. #284
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oldtimer, I went back and reviewed the news story when Manning's contract was renewed the last time and it stated his current contract runs until the end of 2025. At a proper football club where management are held accountable based on team performance he would have been sacked long ago, but of course TFC is not a proper football club. Is there any reason to keep this thread open?

  15. #285
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Because he's not dead yet?

  16. #286
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    He will outlive all of us.

  17. #287
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Because he's not dead yet?
    I was encouraged when Pelley came in but he must be afraid to act, because there can be no justification. can’t even say it was he was worried about disrupting the club because Hernandez and Herdman were in place.

  18. #288
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmancan View Post
    I was encouraged when Pelley came in but he must be afraid to act, because there can be no justification. can’t even say it was he was worried about disrupting the club because Hernandez and Herdman were in place.
    from a Feb 2022 interview…how is this anything but a fail

    If Manning has his way, though, the addition of Insigne will be one of the first pieces of the puzzle, not one of the last.
    “I do think over the next three or four years, we’re going to add another Lorenzo and we’re going to really push the bar leading up to that World Cup so that Toronto FC is at the forefront of football here in Toronto and within our region,” he said. So much so, he added, that in addition to growing the club’s revenues by 50 per cent over that time, he says that he wants the demand for soccer to get to the point where an expanded 40,000-seat stadium for the World Cup would become a permanent fixture, not just a part-time addition.
    As someone who still yearns to add a CONCACAF Champions League title to his résumé – he’s the only MLS executive to have lost in the final twice – Manning is driven to bring his team back to the championship-contending level it reached after his first full year at the helm in 2016

  19. #289
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Now then

    THIS is the sort of thing that can insure people do not get their contracts renewed

    Not going to talk about the incident beyond - stuff like this getting in the news is a worse sin in most BoD's eyes then losing

  20. #290
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it should go in this thread, because it is so dumb that Manning is still here…. Watch how Shaff gets open and then delivers the perfect cross. #CMNT says thanks.



    OG if you want to close this, no worries. But let’s close the thread with an affordable homegrown, whom BB & BM tossed out. #Pelley finish the job.

  21. #291
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^It's a good bookend to your OP. The Manning conversation is no way near done, however, he's still here...

  22. #292
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldtimer View Post
    ^It's a good bookend to your OP. The Manning conversation is no way near done, however, he's still here...
    Indeed …. LOL or should i say ��

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •