
Originally Posted by
wopchop
Well, maybe the rules are shit?
I can see how using that angle, it isn't a "clear and obvious" error made by the ref. Sure. His view from behind was obstructed by our player, so yeah, it would appear to him there was a foul.
I can buy that, but still not think it is a foul. This new angle they provided still doesn't show a foul IMO. The other angles don't show it either (and the refs at the field agreed).
If they want to use VAR for this, then they need to step up the camera placements to provide the required views.