Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 331 to 333 of 333
  1. #331
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nordrhein-Westfalen, GER
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stegosaurus View Post
    I figured that was the case with Marky. Thanks!
    Cheers! =)

  2. #332
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JuliquE View Post
    Gonzalez was cramping up, after the last game, and they were monitoring him, going into this, whilst Delgado was, of all the players, the one Vanney described as most spent; I think that'd be a huge gamble, and you always want to avoid starting players you, guaranteed, have to sub out.

    Had high hopes for Chapman, but I've not been a huge fan of his attitude, on the pitch (don't like to be too critical of what a player does in his/her spare time). I don't think Vanney trusts Chapman in what is fair to have called must-win games, and you really can't fault him, based on what we've seen; not ready to give up on Chapman, but he needs to get it together, and fast.

    In fairness, Houston didn't want to reschedule, during our run last year, and that might have been a middle-finger to the league. That said, I think it's clear we put all our eggs into the Champions League basket, where we lost zero momentum, after that Houston match. My point was, when our starters aren't in the line-up, I can't see them too affected by a loss like this, as was proven last year.

    All good points, but then Vanney should have managed Marky better. Every player in the field v Houston has contributed usefully to wins (save Mullins ). It was the combination that was obviously wrong as weaknesses were magnified rather than being offset by strengths. Anyway, I am belaboring this. Thanks for your perspective; it’s always informed, fair and supportive to the club.

  3. #333
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nordrhein-Westfalen, GER
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyDM View Post
    All good points, but then Vanney should have managed Marky better. Every player in the field v Houston has contributed usefully to wins (save Mullins ). It was the combination that was obviously wrong as weaknesses were magnified rather than being offset by strengths. Anyway, I am belaboring this. Thanks for your perspective; it’s always informed, fair and supportive to the club.
    'Preciate that, from you; would be remiss not to return the sentiment.

    I, too, feel like there were one or two games earlier on I might have given, for instance, Fraiser time, over Delgado, which might have given Fraiser that bit more confidence/reps. and, as you say, maybe better preserved Delgado to slot in where you suggested.

    I tend to agree, that subs and player rotation are probably not Vanney's strength, albeit, ironically enough, his tactical acumen sometimes helps him with the former; guess I just didn't feel like, this time 'round, it was that insane, all considering. Was just happy to see Fraiser back in the side, to be honest.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •