Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 50
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default New Playoff Format for 2019

    *Single elimination games
    *14 teams make it in total (7 each conference)
    *Top team in each conference get a bye
    *Regular season starts March 2nd
    *Playoffs begin Oct 19th
    *Final is on Nov 10th

    https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2018/...yoff-structure


    Thoughts?
    Last edited by 105; 12-17-2018 at 03:47 PM.

  2. #2
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,228
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 105 View Post
    *Single elimination games
    *14 teams make it in total (7 each conference)
    *Top team in each conference get a bye
    *Regular season starts March 2nd
    *Playoffs begin Oct 19th
    *Final is on Nov 10th

    https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2018/...yoff-structure


    Thoughts?
    I like the fact that the November international break will no longer interfere with the post-season. Not sure what I think about the bracket being fixed with no re-seeding. Will mean some more mid week fixtures during the regular season, meaning roster depth and health will be of most importance.

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To many teams make the playoffs. Yes, I know it’s going to be 28 teams very soon, but still. I don’t like one game playoffs too. Gives more of a chance of something stupid happening (ref call, lucky game etc). I do like that it’s over before the November transfer window though. For me, this is a little worse than the previous format.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,091
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Worst kept secret in MLS. Like the fact that we'll be done in November. That makes way more sense. I like nothing else about it. No more ties like the Impact-TFC one that was probably the most entertaining ever. Hate adding another team to an already watered down number of post-season teams.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not a fan. I appreciated the two match aggregate and giving both clubs a home match in that. This change has an NCAA Final Four feel to it, and while I appreciate that tournament's format, I don't like it for MLS.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Regular season much more important now...

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    111 - row 1, 110 - row 24
    Posts
    530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not a fan. Single games will suck, two legged affairs are always better. They'll be a drop in significant drop in revenue, at least for the weaker teams and MLS as a whole.
    There's also the very possible chance that a lower seeded team will not see any home games for the playoff run and final. Hardly seems fair to the fans.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thumbs down. Playoffs in this league should look more like the MLB than NHL/NBA (with only a few elite teams making it).

    My suggestion would be 4 teams each conference, 1-game first round, 2-game semi-finals, and 2-game final.

  9. #9
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It heavily weights the playoffs in favour of the better teams. It makes the regular season more meaningful. Playoffs earlier. Generally in favour.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canary10 View Post
    Worst kept secret in MLS. Like the fact that we'll be done in November. That makes way more sense. I like nothing else about it. No more ties like the Impact-TFC one that was probably the most entertaining ever. Hate adding another team to an already watered down number of post-season teams.
    Exactly how I feel.

    Id rather they cram games in the regular season and keep the home and home. Its fantastic tension

  11. #11
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The fixed format also potentially rewards a lower seeded team with a home game in round 2 instead of a higher seeded team ---- It's frankly much better to be a 6 seed than a 5 seed as at least as a 6 you have a 50/50 chance of hosting a game in the second round (if the 7 seed wins) while the 5 seed has a 0% chance of that happening as they automatically play a team who just had a bye and finished in first --- seeds 4/5 automatically get the rested team who finished first, while if 6 and 7 both win, 6 hosts 7 (and both just played!).....I would much rather play the 3 seed on the road in round 1 as a "6", than the 4 seed on the road in round 1 as a "5", and know that my next opponent also just played a game as well (either the 3 or the 7).....I think smart coaches may just have no problem angling their way to 6 instead of 5 if that scenario comes into play on the last weekend....

    I also think the possibility for more "odd" (lower seeded) winners is raised in this type format.....

    Being done earlier is better, the lack of two-legged affairs is worse; more mid-week regular season games is worse for most people I would imagine too.....
    Last edited by tfcfans; 12-17-2018 at 05:08 PM.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flambe View Post
    Not a fan. Single games will suck, two legged affairs are always better. They'll be a drop in significant drop in revenue, at least for the weaker teams and MLS as a whole.
    There's also the very possible chance that a lower seeded team will not see any home games for the playoff run and final. Hardly seems fair to the fans.
    Agree with this too.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MLS Cup now a random crapshoot.

    Increases value of Supporters Shield.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are certainly pros and cons to this system. I think overall, though, that the pros win out, and we just have to get used to the cons.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Everybody seems to love the fact that the season will end sooner, meaning that the teams that don’t make the playoffs will have over 4 months of inactivity. Soccer is a world game and in the big leagues in Europe and even in South America players might have maybe 6 weeks off max and then they are back at it , now we are having players do nothing for four month and then think a league like the MLS is going to develop players with players doing nothing for four month? Another reason if I’m a young player that has potential I’m staying away from a league that has its majority of players doing nothing for four months while in Europe and South America are players are playing more and keeping sharp rather than doing nothing for four months.

  16. #16
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's not 4 months, it's a little over three, and there is nothing in the CBA that prevents teams who miss the playoffs from training throughout the playoffs if they choose.

    I know our team will welcome a shorter season. It's been too long, resulting in injuries.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    113
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't mind the shorter season. The weather is a concern for not just the matchgoing fans but the players as well. I don't think the grass pitches used by MLS teams can handle the wintry conditions; if we were to continue on till December, then teams will need to play with artificial pitches or invest in infrastructure to keep pitches in good condition (the latter less likely for most MLS sides).

    I am concerned by the single-elimination format. I know that the number of fixtures becomes a concern the more teams they add, but teams are far away from each other. For domestic cups, it's fine, but not for the MLS Cup. You want to see the best of the best go through, and 2 legs allow for that. I guess that's where the unseeded format compensates for the single eliminations.

    Also, I wonder what'll happen if an MLS player in the playoffs gets called up for international football. That might create some contention with certain teams. At the moment, TFC have the following players who can potentially get called up to internationals:
    - Jozy
    - Bradley
    - Delgado
    - Any potential new signings

    Already, two of them are our most important players. Imagine having them go out for the international break just before the playoffs and then get injured.
    Last edited by Omar; 12-18-2018 at 06:12 PM.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hate it.

    I understand what they are trying to do, but they should have shortened the regular season. Or done something to make seeding in the playoffs more meaningful.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  19. #19
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,718
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ensco View Post
    MLS Cup now a random crapshoot.

    .
    It always was - this just makes it explicit.


    *****

    Two game series are a construct that we are used to. Nobody complains about the World Cup post group stage not being 2 game series.

    This gives the 1-3 seeded teams a significant advantage - 4 not so much but the slide down has to happen somewhere.

    Will make for great TV & spectacle - given the TV contract in the US is coming up in 2020, this is a good move.
    Last edited by OgtheDim; 12-18-2018 at 06:46 AM.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    It always was - this just makes it explicit.


    *****

    Two game series are a construct that we are used to. Nobody complains about the World Cup post group stage not being 2 game series.

    This gives the 1-3 seeded teams a significant advantage - 4 not so much but the slide down has to happen somewhere.

    Will make for great TV & spectacle - given the TV contract in the US is coming up in 2020, this is a good move.
    I agree about TV liking it. But I personally don’t like it.

    You have no choice with a World Cup. You have too many teams and not enough time.

    To play 7 months only to arrange the seeding and qualification for a 14 team knockout tournament is upside down.

    They wrecked a good thing, the vast majority of playoff series the last three years were interesting, well played, tense.

    Did nobody at the league office consider what Seattle did here in the two Cup finals, when you had a clearly better home team? You watch, a ton of these games are going to be 0-0 and go to penalties. Plus we don’t have close to World Cup caliber refereeing - refs won’t give red cards in knockout games -these games will be hackathons.

    Plus it really further rewards teams on plastic, who already have an edge in building up an excellent home record, and now can play most/all knockout playofff games at home.

    Ugh. I really hate it.
    Last edited by ensco; 12-18-2018 at 07:57 AM.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    3,102
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's shit.

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    1,979
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    More games will be decided by penalties now. There will probably be a lot more games like when Seattle beat us without trying to win the game. Go on the road and park the bus and hope to get lucky.

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    8,091
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    It always was - this just makes it explicit.


    *****

    Two game series are a construct that we are used to. Nobody complains about the World Cup post group stage not being 2 game series.

    This gives the 1-3 seeded teams a significant advantage - 4 not so much but the slide down has to happen somewhere.

    Will make for great TV & spectacle - given the TV contract in the US is coming up in 2020, this is a good move.
    This may be an unpopular opinion but I dislike the World Cup. The football is definitely not as fun to watch as club football. The stakes are too high and teams play conservatively as a result. The same will happen with the single game knock-outs in MLS (stakes not being as high though obviously).

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canary10 View Post
    Worst kept secret in MLS. Like the fact that we'll be done in November. That makes way more sense. I like nothing else about it. No more ties like the Impact-TFC one that was probably the most entertaining ever. Hate adding another team to an already watered down number of post-season teams.
    Quote Originally Posted by ag futbol View Post
    Thumbs down. Playoffs in this league should look more like the MLB than NHL/NBA (with only a few elite teams making it).

    My suggestion would be 4 teams each conference, 1-game first round, 2-game semi-finals, and 2-game final.
    Quote Originally Posted by ensco View Post
    MLS Cup now a random crapshoot.

    Increases value of Supporters Shield.
    Quote Originally Posted by leafsman View Post
    More games will be decided by penalties now. There will probably be a lot more games like when Seattle beat us without trying to win the game. Go on the road and park the bus and hope to get lucky.
    Quoted all of these for truth.

    The only thing I value is the earlier finish of the Cup. (League doesn't really shift end date) This prevents the interruption of the international dates playing a factor. I'd rather have two legged series with two games a week, that way depth will be tested.

    In current form I will no longer care about the Cup. Shield or bust.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Like almost everybody already said:
    I hate everything about this new format, except that the season will end more early.

  26. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leafsman View Post
    More games will be decided by penalties now. There will probably be a lot more games like when Seattle beat us without trying to win the game. Go on the road and park the bus and hope to get lucky.
    This was my first thought as well. One of the main points of having a 2 game series with the away goals rule is to avoid both of these things. Because of this, I doubt we won't hear any grumbling about the format next year as well (although no format could ever make EVERYONE happy, I guess).

    I suspect the 2022 Qatar World Cup scheduling had a role here and things may be reviewed again once that is done.

  27. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    It always was - this just makes it explicit.


    *****

    Two game series are a construct that we are used to. Nobody complains about the World Cup post group stage not being 2 game series.

    This gives the 1-3 seeded teams a significant advantage - 4 not so much but the slide down has to happen somewhere.

    Will make for great TV & spectacle - given the TV contract in the US is coming up in 2020, this is a good move.

    You have to remember that the World Cup is essentially a neutral-venue tournament, so it's not exactly apples to apples. Imagine if France had hosted the most recent World Cup, but played all their knockout games in another country. That would be silly.

    MLS supporters who have their club qualify in the 5, 6 or 7 seeds may very likely not get a home game, even if they win the MLS cup. Their home support is essentially done at the end of the regular season. Plus you miss the drama of a two-leg series. Awful.

  28. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    4,656
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To many teams are making the playoffs right now, it should be cut down to 7 or 8 at most I think.

    At this rate they should just have two supporters shield, once for each conference with the number of teams, have a truly balanced schedule, split the league into two, and have the best 3 teams from each conference face off for the grand prize.

  29. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    7,784
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ensco View Post
    MLS Cup now a random crapshoot.

    Increases value of Supporters Shield.
    This is exactly how I see it too.

    When the league gets to 32 teams I bet every team is in this cup competition, I bet it starts in August or so, and will be essentially like the FA Cup.

  30. #30
    RPB Member
    Vice-President

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    1,151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The new format seems a bit rushed to me. I won't miss the December MLS cup games, that's for sure, but I will miss the home and away part of the playoffs.

    One question though, does the away goal rule still count?

    Found this interesting on the TFC site. Has more words to explain the format. https://www.torontofc.ca/post/2018/1...structure-2019

    Home-Field Advantage for Top Clubs Throughout the Playoffs: Higher-seeded teams will enjoy home-field advantage throughout the playoffs, hosting every match in front of a home crowd. Throughout the years, the MLS postseason has featured some single-elimination matches, and the home team has advanced at a considerably higher rate than two-game playoff series.
    • Historically, higher seeded teams have advanced or won 67.3 percent of the 49 single-game elimination playoff matches, including MLS Cup matches for which the higher seed earned the right to host.
    • Through the 78 examples of two-game series throughout the years, the higher seed advanced just 55.1 percent of the time.


    Given the above stat, it would appear that the 2nd leg sees the lower seeded team come from behind or take advantage of the away goal rule.

    I hope this will encourage more supporters to attend away playoff matches. It's truly a great atmosphere when you invade another team's stadium - nothing compared to our home atmosphere of course.
    Road Games:
    2013 - Montréal , 2014 - Orlando (Disney Classic), Montréal
    2015 - Columbus, New England, Montréal
    2016 - NYCFC (Leg 2 Conference Semis), Montréal (Leg 1 Conference Final)
    2017 - Ottawa (Leg 1 Canadian Championship Semi), DCU, Red Bulls (Leg 1 Conference Final), Columbus (Leg 2 Conference Final)
    2019 - Montréal, NYCFC (Eastern Conference Semi @ Citi Field), Seattle (MLS Cup Final)

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •