Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 39

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Voyageurs Cup 2017


  2. #2
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.canadasoccer.com/canadian...ontent-p160637

    New to the Canadian Championship in 2017, Canada Soccer has added a Canadian Content rule ensuring that at least three Canadians are included on every starting lineup throughout the competition.
    I suppose they can do this now that Vancouver finally got enough Canadians to dress 3 as starters.

  3. #3
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    http://www.canadasoccer.com/canadian...ontent-p160637



    I suppose they can do this now that Vancouver finally got enough Canadians to dress 3 as starters.
    Well played.
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  4. #4
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ottawa trip the day after the long weekend. Whoah.
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In line with the launch of the new CONCACAF Champions League format which places the Canadian representative in Phase II beginning in March 2018, a special one-match Canadian playoff between last year's winners Toronto FC (unless Toronto FC repeats as Canadian winners) and the 2017 winners will be played on 9 August in Toronto to determine who will advance.

    So we lost our guaranteed Champions League spot in the 2017-2018 CONCACAF Champions League

  6. #6
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michaeltfc91 View Post
    In line with the launch of the new CONCACAF Champions League format which places the Canadian representative in Phase II beginning in March 2018, a special one-match Canadian playoff between last year's winners Toronto FC (unless Toronto FC repeats as Canadian winners) and the 2017 winners will be played on 9 August in Toronto to determine who will advance.

    So we lost our guaranteed Champions League spot in the 2017-2018 CONCACAF Champions League
    I actually don't mind this idea. Has the potential to be a HUGE night for Canadian soccer.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    I actually don't mind this idea. Has the potential to be a HUGE night for Canadian soccer.
    Only if we lose. Plus it has the potential to make Will Johnsons amazing leg breaking goal irrelevant.

  8. #8
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyDM View Post
    Only if we lose. Plus it has the potential to make Will Johnsons amazing leg breaking goal irrelevant.
    Uh, so its not a big night if we have a one off game against Vancouver or Montreal at our place and win?

    As for making that goal irrelevant, I'm pretty darn sure the CSA didn't have to give us a slot in the CCL in 2018 at all. Given that, we get the inside track all the way on this thing. We thought winning that competition meant CCL - well apparently it doesn't. What it gives us is home field advantage. In the grand scheme of things, I'll take that. Would I prefer we had an in on this thing? Sure. But, rules change and somebody was going to lose out here.

    Ultimately, there is no way the CSA were going to make teams wait 18 months from winning the Voyaguers to get in the CCL - that wasn't going to happen. The tradeoff for this is getting into a knockout competition right away with probable seed that means Canadian teams don't play a US or Mexican team until the quarters.
    Last edited by OgtheDim; 03-10-2017 at 06:59 AM.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Uh, so its not a big night if we have a one off game against Vancouver or Montreal at our place and win?

    As for making that goal irrelevant, I'm pretty darn sure the CSA didn't have to give us a slot in the CCL in 2018 at all. Given that, we get the inside track all the way on this thing. We thought winning that competition meant CCL - well apparently it doesn't. What it gives us is home field advantage. In the grand scheme of things, I'll take that. Would I prefer we had an in on this thing? Sure. But, rules change and somebody was going to lose out here.

    Ultimately, there is no way the CSA were going to make teams wait 18 months from winning the Voyaguers to get in the CCL - that wasn't going to happen. The tradeoff for this is getting into a knockout competition right away with probable seed that means Canadian teams don't play a US or Mexican team until the quarters.
    But you can't change the rules AFTER the competition has already taken place. That's incredibly unfair.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I meant that the "big night". Only happens if we lose this years tourney

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,833
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dumb that we've lost our qualification for the CCL, but I guess something had to be done...

    This does open up the interesting angle that we could play an entire squad of subs and reserve for this whole tournament with the knowledge that if we lose, we can put out a full strength team in the playoff to secure CCL qualification. Not that I think this will actually happen.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    May is going to be a busy month. Yikes.

  13. #13
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    May is going to be a busy month. Yikes.
    It always is. Which is why I admire Manning for making the Voyageurs and the CCL so important. They could do like Vancouver did for years and just avoid the whole thing. But not TFC anymore.

    I would not be surprised if the CSA wanted to just skip the 2016 winner and make the 2017 Voyageurs team the CCL entrant and Manning slighly pointed out there was another option. Hey, we win, we are in. We don't win, and we have a cup final, at our place, to get there. I'll take that.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Section 105
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Need to go for the cup win to remove any jabbering points by our west coast and east river rivals. but at least we have the other way in as consolation in case we don't get the silverware.

  15. #15
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Section_105 View Post
    Need to go for the cup win to remove any jabbering points by our west coast and east river rivals.

    Easy answer to that


    &


  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Looking ahead to 2018, Canada Soccer has also confirmed plans to expand the Canadian Championship to include winning teams from both League1 Ontario and Premičre Ligue de soccer du Québec."

    So why those two and not the six Canadian teams in the PDL? The US Open Cup allows PDL teams to enter....if we did it in Canada we would have a 13 team tournament.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am very exciting to see that the Voyageur Cup has expanded to include League 1 Teams! I am assuming though, if the Academy wins, they wouldn't be eligble?

  18. #18
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canuck82 View Post
    "Looking ahead to 2018, Canada Soccer has also confirmed plans to expand the Canadian Championship to include winning teams from both League1 Ontario and Premičre Ligue de soccer du Québec."

    So why those two and not the six Canadian teams in the PDL? The US Open Cup allows PDL teams to enter....if we did it in Canada we would have a 13 team tournament.
    What if there just happened to be 9 CPL teams in 2018...

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This CCL thing is absolute horseshit. They can't make a change like that after it has already declared that Toronto is the CCL entrant (or are they going to try some 'we hadn't actually officially declared it yet' thing)?

    TFC should get into the next CCL, no matter what. Then maybe this year's and next year's CC winners can play-off.

    Doing it this way is fucking lame.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    This CCL thing is absolute horseshit. They can't make a change like that after it has already declared that Toronto is the CCL entrant (or are they going to try some 'we hadn't actually officially declared it yet' thing)?

    TFC should get into the next CCL, no matter what. Then maybe this year's and next year's CC winners can play-off.

    Doing it this way is fucking lame.
    Bingo. More politely, but bingo. Will Johnson's goal meant something. Remeber the feeling?

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,141
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyDM View Post
    Will Johnson's goal meant something. Remeber the feeling?
    It meant winning the Voyageurs' Cup and being crowned champions of Canada. That's enough for me.

    In any case, we are going to win again this year, no playoff needed.

  22. #22
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mowe View Post
    It meant winning the Voyageurs' Cup and being crowned champions of Canada. That's enough for me.

    In any case, we are going to win again this year, no playoff needed.
    That's confidence! What if Montreal wins this year then wins the playoff on our home turf? It's happened before, ya know that Montreal qualified for the CCL in our house. I'll leave it at that.
    Last edited by Oldtimer; 03-10-2017 at 01:32 PM.
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What will the cap tie rules be for TFC if they go through to CCL based on the 2016 win?

    Put another way, is Vasquez tied with Cruz Azul?

  24. #24
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul-collins View Post
    What will the cap tie rules be for TFC if they go through to CCL based on the 2016 win?

    Put another way, is Vasquez tied with Cruz Azul?
    Paging John Molinaro. Good question to ask!!!
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Whistler
    Posts
    398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul-collins View Post
    What will the cap tie rules be for TFC if they go through to CCL based on the 2016 win?

    Put another way, is Vasquez tied with Cruz Azul?
    TFC cant go in based on the 2016 win, at best they will go in based on the 2017 win, or the playoff between TFC and the 2017 winner. Either way Vasquez would not be cup tied as he was not on Cruz Azul in 2017, and he would be eligible to paly in the playoff match in 2017.

  26. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul-collins View Post
    What will the cap tie rules be for TFC if they go through to CCL based on the 2016 win?

    Put another way, is Vasquez tied with Cruz Azul?
    You can't be cuptied for a competition you've never played in.

    Cruz Azul didn't qualify for the CCL in 16/17 so Vasquez never played in it.

  27. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    You can't be cuptied for a competition you've never played in.

    Cruz Azul didn't qualify for the CCL in 16/17 so Vasquez never played in it.
    Ok, to be honest I only threw his name out there because it was on the top of my head.

    Maybe I ask it this way: If TFC get into CCL based on the 2016 win, can Will Johnson play for Orlando in the same tournament?

    Anyway, maybe it's all moot as I doubt there are many players who played for us last year in the tournament who have moved on (too lazy to look) and probably fewer who have joined but played in their qualifying games last year at their previous club?

    It's more of a theoretical exercise at this point. But I would think the cap tie rules should be waived for 2016 participants on principle. Seems wrong that you can be disqualified from playing for your new club two years after you've moved based on the transition tournament structure.

  28. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul-collins View Post
    Ok, to be honest I only threw his name out there because it was on the top of my head.

    Maybe I ask it this way: If TFC get into CCL based on the 2016 win, can Will Johnson play for Orlando in the same tournament?

    Anyway, maybe it's all moot as I doubt there are many players who played for us last year in the tournament who have moved on (too lazy to look) and probably fewer who have joined but played in their qualifying games last year at their previous club?

    It's more of a theoretical exercise at this point. But I would think the cap tie rules should be waived for 2016 participants on principle. Seems wrong that you can be disqualified from playing for your new club two years after you've moved based on the transition tournament structure.
    You can't be cup tied for participation in the CCL by playing in the Voyageurs Cup. They are two completely different competitions.

    Being cup tied for the CCL would be playing in the group stages for say Saprissa then moving to MLS over the offseason to a team still in the CCL knock out stages.

    You're wayyyyyyyyyyyyy over thinking things man

    EDIT: From CONCACAF itself

    Once having been registered on a roster for a club in any stage, a player may not be registered for any other club during the same edition of the competition.
    Bottom of page 17 Link
    Last edited by Areathrasher; 03-10-2017 at 04:31 PM.

  29. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    662
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    You're wayyyyyyyyyyyyy over thinking things man
    Or underthinking.

  30. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    1,979
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The CSA proves how much of a joke they are. Most sensible thing to do would have this years winner face net year winner instead of changing the rules after the fact.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •