Quote Originally Posted by barticusz View Post
Instead of focusing on the negatives of Vanney I encourage you to look at the positives, there are quite a few.
I asked for that in my post above:
The only argument I ever see from his proponents are to keep him because they don't want change. Let's have a few posts with some solid reasons why we should keep him beyond not liking change or because he's only had 20 matches in charge. Let's have some meat & potatoes, show us why we should be optimistic posts. I'm listening.
So let's hear them.