Page 77 of 197 FirstFirst ... 276773747576777879808187127177 ... LastLast
Results 2,281 to 2,310 of 5892
  1. #2281
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ManUtd4ever View Post
    If an artificial turf is laid on top of the grass for a 24 hour period and then removed, the grass should hold up, shouldn't it?
    According to the Terratile site, yes.

    Simple CFL turf isn't like the football one. No pellets usually. Just a green carpet usually. Said a team could install it in 8 hours and remove in 8 hours. TFC plays Saturday, install this post match, Argos play Sunday afternoon, remove either Sunday night or Monday morning.
    Last edited by Ultra & Proud; 05-20-2015 at 10:11 AM.

  2. #2282
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashcleaner View Post
    "Entitled" is feeling you've outgrown the aforementioned stadium that was built for you and coming up with a plan to groundshare at York University along with MLSE and Soccer Canada, and then bowing out of that project entirely leaving the university and the other partners picking up the pieces.
    Sorry Cash - you are wrong here - MLSE were never involved in the York University project. It was a York/Argos/CSA plan.

    And MLSE were the ones who pulled out of the Varsity stadium plan first before the University pulled the plug on that project.

  3. #2283
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielHurl View Post
    .....And MLSE were the ones who pulled out of the Varsity stadium plan first before the University pulled the plug on that project.
    The city was never going to approve that .....too many Annex people getting all huffy about parking.

  4. #2284
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielHurl View Post
    Sorry Cash - you are wrong here - MLSE were never involved in the York University project. It was a York/Argos/CSA plan.

    And MLSE were the ones who pulled out of the Varsity stadium plan first before the University pulled the plug on that project.
    Was there another U of T plan? The one I heard was bogged down by the residents groups and alumni that wanted a track. If you want to say MLSE "walked away" that technically correct after seeing no end of red tape and people that didn't want to see it happen.
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  5. #2285
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The city was never going to approve that .....too many Annex people getting all huffy about parking.
    possibly - but that's something different
    Last edited by GabrielHurl; 05-20-2015 at 10:34 AM.

  6. #2286
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,252
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Kool View Post
    I am curious, if this does cause TFC popularity to suffer over the long term (or short term even) with empty seats at their newly expanded stadium and a decrease in TFC ticket sales/merch and other revenue from the stadium, I wonder how this will affect Rogers and MLSE in general since Rogers have a stake in TFC and the stadium but not the Argos. If the Argos killed off some of their anticipated revenue there may be some friction in the MLSE ownership team.
    There is already enough friction within the Boggers partnership to last a life time.

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  7. #2287
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    5,380
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd like to see a push for an investigation into this dual surface option. If it is technically feasible, it should be done, regardless of cost.

  8. #2288
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,252
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fort York Redcoat View Post
    Was there another U of T plan? The one I heard was bogged down by the residents groups and alumni that wanted a track. If you want to say MLSE "walked away" that technically correct after seeing no end of red tape and people that didn't want to see it happen.
    MLSE's interest in the U of T project, had more to do with an interest in developing the pricey Bloor Street real estate that was going to be a part of it. The project really went south when U of T president Robert Birgeneau departed for the chancellors position at Berkley. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_J._Birgeneau The schools position and interest on the project really changed with his successor with them eventually pull out to build a more student friendly facility.

    The Argos and CSA initially were discussing a return to the Ex grounds for new stadium in the beginning before turning their focus to U of T.
    Last edited by Red CB Toronto; 05-20-2015 at 10:43 AM.

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  9. #2289
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fort York Redcoat View Post
    Was there another U of T plan? The one I heard was bogged down by the residents groups and alumni that wanted a track. If you want to say MLSE "walked away" that technically correct after seeing no end of red tape and people that didn't want to see it happen.
    It looks like there was - http://slam.canoe.com/Slam/Football/...04/700446.html

    Sokolowski agreed, but the stadium project shifted back to U of T when Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. suddenly jumped into the mix in December of 2003 with intentions to partner with the school on a multiple sports complex/shopping centre in the Bloor/Devonshire corridor. The Argos had no choice but to watch those developments because they potentially would be included at some point, possibly with MLSEL buying a percentage of the team.

    Some three months later, MLSEL withdrew from the project because of the low return on investment and the Argos, along with the CSA, joined together in resurrecting the project at the U of T.
    2 months later - the Argos/CSA/U of T announced their plans for the site

    http://www.cbc.ca/sports/football/ne...occer-1.511637

  10. #2290
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Your daughter's bedroom
    Posts
    828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Migs is a known anti-Toronto troll from Vagi...err, I mean Regina or some other troll-farming backwater like that...

  11. #2291
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroit_TFC View Post
    I'd like to see a push for an investigation into this dual surface option. If it is technically feasible, it should be done, regardless of cost.
    Me too. Seems a worthy investment especially since it'd be needed anyway for outdoor ice hockey or concerts. Then it's just buying the turf.

  12. #2292
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wembley pitch 'completely ruined' by NFL games ahead of England's Euro 2016 qualifier against Slovenia
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footba...ed-nfl-4631347


  13. #2293
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that's not really new information

  14. #2294
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Can you make that Mirror headline any bigger?

    I want to make sure all the old dudes who watch the Argos can read it.

  15. #2295
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,252
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TorontoFC6fan View Post
    Wembley pitch 'completely ruined' by NFL games ahead of England's Euro 2016 qualifier against Slovenia
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footba...ed-nfl-4631347

    Having attended that game last November, the pitch at Wembley looked like shit during the match. Logos, lines etc all for the world to see.

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  16. #2296
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielHurl View Post
    that's not really new information
    sure Wembley pitch 'completely ruined' by NFL games ahead of England's Euro 2016 qualifier against Slovenia http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footba...ed-nfl-4631347


  17. #2297
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    SSH 2015 - SEC 111
    Posts
    756
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The great irony in all of this is the best and cheapest solution would have been to buy the Argos and fold them.

    Aside from tradition, I don't think anyone would have noticed. CFL football in the east just isn't that popular. Ottawa has folded twice, Montreal twice, Hamilton played half of last season at McMaster and I don't think they even sold that out.

    Year one the Argos may be a tough ticket. But by year two and 3 they'll be back to playing in front of friends and family, aside from the Rider game where the crowd will be green.

    The only questions now are how committed are MLSE to keeping grass at bmo and logos off the field?

    How much argos logos and signage will be installed at BMO,

    And how long before argo fans take over Joe's.

  18. #2298
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glaze View Post
    The great irony in all of this is the best and cheapest solution would have been to buy the Argos and fold them.
    Let's go NFL!!!

  19. #2299
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That article is euro-snobbish sensationalist garbage.

  20. #2300
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glaze View Post
    Hamilton played half of last season at McMaster and I don't think they even sold that out.
    What is it about the internet that lets people think they can just post outright lies?

    They sold out all 3 of their games at McMaster and all 7 of their games at THF last season

  21. #2301
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Looks like Rollins is at BMO for the presser. He just posted this.


  22. #2302
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glaze View Post
    The great irony in all of this is the best and cheapest solution would have been to buy the Argos and fold them.

    Aside from tradition, I don't think anyone would have noticed. CFL football in the east just isn't that popular. Ottawa has folded twice, Montreal twice, Hamilton played half of last season at McMaster and I don't think they even sold that out.

    Year one the Argos may be a tough ticket. But by year two and 3 they'll be back to playing in front of friends and family, aside from the Rider game where the crowd will be green.

    The only questions now are how committed are MLSE to keeping grass at bmo and logos off the field?

    How much argos logos and signage will be installed at BMO,

    And how long before argo fans take over Joe's.
    No way they would do that. The anger and outrage across Canada would be overwhelming. And it would probably cost Bell a bundle as people would drop their many services in protest. In 1979, NHL teams rejected a deal to merge four of the six WHA teams into the league - Edmonton, Winnipeg, Hartford, and Quebec. - by one vote. The Montreal Canadians, who were owned by Molson's, were one of the teams that voted against bringing them in because they didn't want to share the province of Quebec with the Nordiques, who were owned back then by rival brewers Carling O'Keefe. After news broke out, Canadians across the country stopped buying Molson's beer in protest until the owners changed their minds and let the teams into the league.
    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  23. #2303
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    Looks like Rollins is at BMO for the presser. He just posted this.

    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  24. #2304
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They drag that thing around everywhere they go. Its 20+ years old.

  25. #2305
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,451
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Kool View Post
    I am curious, if this does cause TFC popularity to suffer over the long term (or short term even) with empty seats at their newly expanded stadium and a decrease in TFC ticket sales/merch and other revenue from the stadium, I wonder how this will affect Rogers and MLSE in general since Rogers have a stake in TFC and the stadium but not the Argos. If the Argos killed off some of their anticipated revenue there may be some friction in the MLSE ownership team.
    In a lot of ways, it really doesn't matter if TFC is playing in front of empty seats from a business perspective.

    The real value in operating a team in MLS is the share of SUM revenue. Not the ticket revenue that gets shared with the league. TFC have very little operating expenses, outside of their DPs. Player salaries are all paid by the league with the exception of the DPs. If attendance dropped, they could simply drop the DPs and find themselves in a profitable position.

    In the end, I'd wager that the revenues that are shared through the SUM partnership would outweigh any losses at the gate.

    MLSE has done the risk analysis on this. The sad truth is that they calculated that this backlash didn't outweigh the revenue boost by going to a multiuse facility.

    If they wanted to keep TFC in its own soccer specific stadium, they have the funds to do that. They have weighed the options and are going this way.

    The reality is that the Argos aren't the enemy. It's that your interests as a supporter (nice stadium, team is a priority, success on the pitch) don't necessarily align with their interests to generate profit on invested dollars. We have a multi-use stadium and Argos ownership (by 2/3 of MLSE) because that's what makes economic sense to them.

    Sad day but can we really say it is surprising?

  26. #2306
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GabrielHurl View Post
    Sorry Cash - you are wrong here - MLSE were never involved in the York University project. It was a York/Argos/CSA plan.

    And MLSE were the ones who pulled out of the Varsity stadium plan first before the University pulled the plug on that project.
    Not initially they weren't. But as far back as 2003 MLSE had notified the CSA about their intentions to buy an MLS franchise. The FIFA U-20 tourney in 2007 was all tied in with the eventual creation of TFC. Rudi over at U-Sector has most of the details on it, but simply put, if the York U stadium deal had gone through, that's where we'd be watching TFC play now. The U of T plan was one of a few back-up projects after that. BMO Field at it's present location just happened to have been the better choice out of many possible options.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  27. #2307
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    5,380
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ultra & Proud View Post
    Me too. Seems a worthy investment especially since it'd be needed anyway for outdoor ice hockey or concerts. Then it's just buying the turf.
    The difficulty may not be with the hybrid grass - Desso says lots of people do the coverings for events, etc. The question is whether the FieldTurf or equivalent can be used without permanent installation. I know that at the New Meadowlands (or whatever the hell it is called now), the end zone FT is swapped out when they have to change btw Jets and Giants colors, but have no idea on the technical details for doing that for the entire surface.

  28. #2308
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    In a lot of ways, it really doesn't matter if TFC is playing in front of empty seats from a business perspective.
    It's probably the same for the Argos, they could give the tickets away for free like they do for every other live TV show. We keep talking about this like it's 8 home games for the Argos but it's really about every CFL game on TSN.

  29. #2309
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    If they wanted to keep TFC in its own soccer specific stadium, they have the funds to do that.
    Thing is that the Argos don't have the money or support to build or operate in a football specific stadium and since a lot people feel the need to keep the dead horse alive for the greater good then this is the only viable option.

  30. #2310
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    477
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Part of me thinks this is going to go through a stage in about 7 years where the cry will be "we don't control our own revenue streams" and the Argos will be bought fully by MLSE.


    I still think the end game out of all this is a 60K SSS in Downsview by 2030 while the Argos make do in BMO (or whatever it is called) down by the lake.
    come'on we can hardly get 60k on TV. Let try to grow that first.
    BMO is the stadium ... ML$E decided to rebuild BMO instead of spending a similar amount on greenfield stadium at the Vaughn soccer centre or Downsview.

    Market for soccer in this town is 5k diehard/supporter groups, 5k soccer moms/dads/kids, 10k casual event fans (Most of which get tickets through friends/employers that buy SSH to multiple MLSE teams for client entertainment purposes). I sit in 107. Its a different set of fans every game, most get tickets given to them to try it out. That why we usually only get 8-10k for wednesday games (last game being an exception due to "newness" of the stadium). Still don't get why they added 8000 seats, can't even fill them for game #1.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •