Oh, absolutely sure that it wasn't aimed at me.
I just took advantage of the opportunity to see that he was posting something, probably looking in at the responses and may want to actually weigh in on the issue as opposed to telling us... again... that the Argos don't sell as many tickets. Just reminding him as to what the actual question is.
I'm even willing to help the negative side of the discussion based on current evidence.
If I were him, I would highlight that while the ground share has been relatively flawless to this point (no lines, roof is nice, grass is pristine, etc), the current trend in TV Ratings means that TFC supporters should keep the attention on the promise of "first priority."
Ratings drive game decisions, as we see regularly in the NHL when Vancouver-Toronto games are changed to 4pm PST in order to appease fans in the East. Now, these are two different leagues but 2/3 of MLSE are heavily vested in the Argos which clearly are the ratings winners. And they are complaining right now about less than ideal game times, looking for standard times for their fans and probably looking at where to maximize both gate and TV revenue.
As time goes, I'd be pretty leery about TFC being able to stand up to those conditions in the Board Room. Right now, ground share is sensitive so TFC have benefited (for the most part) with primary treatment and dates. Memories are short though and times change. Moving Argo games in the future is likely an easier decision.
That's where I would focus and something about this ground share that may not work long term.
See? Wasn't so hard