I agree, in this case, that we *might* get rewarded with some consistency for Gilberto. But in general, I can't say that is a root cause of failure at this club. If I try to sail across the atlantic in a bathtub, then a tubber dingy, then an inner tube, and finally a pool noodle and they all fail, my issue isn't a lack of consistency, it's having a bad plan in the first place.
In the history of this club, there have been *maybe* 1 or 2 times where we had a plan that actually made sense from the outset. One of those times was with Kevin Payne/Nelsen combo. Every other time was basically a hair-brained scheme doomed to fail from the outset. And this year was no different, it was a lot of money masking some very poorly laid out ideas.
And here we are again, trusting two people who might have pedigree - but in a practical sense have no experience and are still figuring out what their jobs require - to run the gauntlet in a market that changes coaches like they change underwear. These guys do not have much to fall back on if things start to go poorly. An experienced coach, who we are financially committed to and extending the proper authority, has a better chance of making this work. And frankly, we're just heading into another period of a lot of turnover here, so why not let someone who's done it before figure that out rather than a couple of guys who are learning on the job?