Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 42 of 42
  1. #31
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fort York Redcoat View Post
    When they won they did.

    They've lost 10 games so far this year.
    The reality of a parity league, it's hard to stay on top.
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  2. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    227
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by james View Post
    Germany and England both have a very strong 2nd and even 3rd division. MLS Clubs i think if were put in these leagues 2nd division they would get relegated...3rd division they may do just ok, but would not be a push over for MLS clubs thats for sure. Other leagues like Italy, France, Spain, Holland there 2nd divisions i do not think are as strong, MLS Clubs may survive in the 2nd divison. Leagues like Scotland, Belgium, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland, Portugal, Russia and so on i would hope MLS Clubs would beable to win in a 2nd division of these Leagues with no problem, there for beable to be in a Division 1 league.
    I'd love to see a "made for TV" event where a top 5 calibre MLS team travelled to England and played their way up the English football league pyramid over the course of 3 weeks. Have them play 1 game against a mid table team from each league, beginning with Blue Square (5th Tier) going all the way up to the Premiership.

    I don't think the standard of play in MLS is as poor as many people claim. Clearly the MLS standard is well below the top leagues in Europe (England, Italy, Spain, Germany, France, Holland...) I would agree that The average North American player has a lower football IQ and probably less technical ability on the ball. However the speed, strength and athleticism of players in MLS is probably better than that of many tier 2 leagues in Europe. At its current stage of evolution, MLS game might not always be pretty too watch, but the sport is progressing here.

    It will be interesting to see how the pro game evolves in North America in the next 5-10 years. European basketball evolved in a bit of a isolated bubble outside of the NBA game 15-20 years ago, and that style of play eventually came to influence on the NBA game of today. Maybe the MLS will offer the soccer world some new innovation 10 years down he line

  3. #33
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sec. 112
    Posts
    2,517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    J.League is far better than MLS as well. Honestly, MLS is top 20 but its goal should be top 8 by 2030. We're not that far off, I'd say were getting close to the 'other' European leagues. A top MLS side could challenge in the Eredivise for a European spot.

  4. #34
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ I agree. Above all else, MLS has the potential to be a top 10, perhaps even a top 5 league when you factor in the all-important economic side of things. Recession or not, the US still has the world's largest and most active economy, and the people who own the clubs here are often rolling in disposable income. As much as we don't want to believe it; even in sports, money makes the world go round. Perhaps the biggest barrier to MLS's success is the competition from other sports for the fan's dollar.

    I'm quite confident that over time it will be a league that rivals some currently in the top places.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  5. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I was somewhat surprised to see the attendance figures myself and where they stack up in the world. The main difference though is sponsorship and T.V money which if the league finaly taps into will allow this league to really grow.
    Well heres a glimpse on what other leagues average attedence in 2011/12. This does not include playoffs, or cup matches.

    Denmark
    1. Copenhagen 15,540
    2. Brondby 12,608
    3. Aarhus 11,012
    4. Odense BK 7,560
    lowest attendence in 1st division-
    12. Lynby BK 2,168

    Switzerland
    1. FC Basel 29,775
    2. Young Boys 21,104
    3. Luzern 14,180
    4. Servette 10,697
    lowest attendence 1st division-
    10. xmax FC 4,149

    Netherlands
    1. Ajax 50,147
    2.Feyenoord 44,781
    3. PSV 33,353
    4. Tweente 28,237
    Lowest 1st divsion attednece -
    18. SBV 3,301

    Croatia
    1.Split 9,833
    2.Dinamo 3,113
    3.NK Istra 2,527
    4. HNK 2,467
    lowest attendence 1st division
    16. NK Varazdin 653

    Belgium
    1. Standard Liege 25,113
    2. Club Brugge 24,344
    3. Andelecht 22,349
    4. Genk 21,942
    lowest attendence 1st division
    16. RAEC 5,315

    Portugal
    1. Benifica 42,664
    2. Porto 35,176
    3.Sporting 34,934
    4. Braga 15,029
    Lowest attendence in 1st division
    16. Nacional 1,886

    Scotland
    1. Celtic 49, 967
    2. Rangers 46,519
    3. Hearts 13,605
    4. Hibs 9,654
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    12. St. Johnstone 3,923

    Russia

    1. Moskva 24,243
    2. Kuban 22,753
    3. Zenit 19,393
    4. CSKA 17,632
    lowest 1st division attedence
    16.Spartak Nalchik 5,600

    Poland
    1. Legia Warszawa 20,928
    2. Lechia Gdansk 17,732
    3. Slask Wroclaw 16,944
    4. Wisla Krakow 16,402
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    16. GKS 2,022

    France
    1. PSG 42,891
    2. OM Marseille 40,455
    3. Lyon 33,139
    4. Saint Etienne 21,533
    Lowest attedence in 1st division
    20. AC Ajaccio 6,338

    Greece
    1. Olympiakos 21,523
    2. PAOK 11,393
    3. Panathinaikos 9,554
    4. Aris 6,944
    lowest 1st division attendence
    16. Doxa Drama 672

    Norway
    1. Rosenborg BK 14,510
    2. Valenrenga IF 13,337
    3. SK Brann 13,012
    4. Viking FK 10,250
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    16. sogndal IL 3,211

    Japan
    1. Urawa Reds 33,910
    2. Niigata 26,049
    3. Yokohoma 21,038
    4. Kawasaki 17,340
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    18. Omiya 9,099

    Argentina
    1. Boca Juniors 41,700
    2. Newells Old Boys 34,333
    3. Belgrano 27,889
    4. Racing Club 27,111
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    20. Arsenal FC 6,722

    MLS - 2011
    1. Seattle 38,496
    2. LA 23,335
    3.Vancouver 20,412
    4. Toronto 20,267
    lowest attendence in 1st division
    18. San Jose 11,858
    Last edited by james; 08-27-2012 at 11:42 PM.

  6. #36
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,914
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MLS numbers are tickets sold. Pretty sure many European numbers are if anything artificially low due to tax implications to the teams (e.g. UK VAT).

  7. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't believe MLS is top 20 at all...going by CCL no MLS club has won it and they have only been runner-up once recently even though it has the same berths as Mexico. The Costa Ricans have done better and other leagues like Honduras have matched it. It's not top-20. Maybe bottom-20...
    Last edited by FIAF; 08-27-2012 at 08:35 PM.

  8. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FIAF View Post
    I don't believe MLS is top 20 at all...going by CCL no MLS club has won it and they have only been runner-up once recently even though it has the same berths as Mexico. The Costa Ricans have done better and other leagues like Honduras have matched it. It's not top-20. Maybe top-30...
    Two MLS clubs did win the tournament in its previous incarnation.

    I think its only a matter of time before that happens again (especially with the new rules favouring the US teams).

  9. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Etobicoke
    Posts
    816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by __wowza View Post
    imagine if you will a team so spectacularly bad that a price freeze, on their already overpriced tickets, would be considered a kindness from their ownership group..
    There are strange things done 'neath the midnight sun....

  10. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    112
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MLS is no issue really when it comes to gates...it's TV money where every league on the planet has us beat.

  11. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    21,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The MLS is still low level league. The depth of talent in football, and not just on the field but on the bench and the offices in the rest of the world, and particularly Europe, is leaps and bounds ahead of here. Someone said that the Second division is not strong in Italy, Serie B is full of very skilled players on very organized teams, that would beat any MLS team more often then not. This league is build all wrong, with a very shallow talent pool and selects its players on the wrong attributes, is organizationally and tactically weak. The league is getting better, but we are light years away, teams like the Sounders, Vancouver and Montreal seem to be on the right path all thought the finish line is far, far away.

    Someone is also saying that the Portuguese league will catch Serie A, I like Portuguese football, but no way, the depth of professional players in Italy is far beyond, pretty well any other country in Europe except Spain, at this point. Need I remind people that we just came to the last game of the Euros during a "down" cycle in Italy football, with mostly Serie A players. If "fair play" is actually introduced next year, Serie A will climb back to the top of world leagues due to the depth of Italian talent.

  12. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trane View Post
    The MLS is still low level league. The depth of talent in football, and not just on the field but on the bench and the offices in the rest of the world, and particularly Europe, is leaps and bounds ahead of here. Someone said that the Second division is not strong in Italy, Serie B is full of very skilled players on very organized teams, that would beat any MLS team more often then not. This league is build all wrong, with a very shallow talent pool and selects its players on the wrong attributes, is organizationally and tactically weak. The league is getting better, but we are light years away, teams like the Sounders, Vancouver and Montreal seem to be on the right path all thought the finish line is far, far away.

    Someone is also saying that the Portuguese league will catch Serie A, I like Portuguese football, but no way, the depth of professional players in Italy is far beyond, pretty well any other country in Europe except Spain, at this point. Need I remind people that we just came to the last game of the Euros during a "down" cycle in Italy football, with mostly Serie A players. If "fair play" is actually introduced next year, Serie A will climb back to the top of world leagues due to the depth of Italian talent.
    i would say Italy is still a very strong league, and probably has strong home grown players as they pretty much always have had strong home grown players. But the league is not as strong as id say as England, Germany 2nd divisions thats for sure. And yes AC Milan and Inter Milan or Juventus exc are top teams and can be the best in Europe at times but its the teams at the bottom half of Seria A that can be weaker. There is a bigger gap between big clubs and smaller clubs. And i don't think there Seria B is as strong because of things like money and attendence and TV ratings. Only 4 clubs in Seria B were getting attendence average over 9,000 fans a game, the other 18 clubs was drawing between 1,000 and 8,000 fans last year. England didn't have a single team of there 24 clubs drawing under 9,000 fans in there 2nd divison, and Germany had only 2 clubs of there 18 clubs drawing under 9,000. Stadiums in Italy are often far behind German and England clubs, they often are run down and need serious renovations done, but clubs can often not afford to fix them up. Germany and England 2nd division also most likely have more money to bring in Foreign talent. Besides those 2 Leagues tho there 2nd division is probably just as good or better then in Spain...and better then any other leagues 2nd division.

    Portugal is deffinitly far behind Seria A and B. Besides a few strong clubs such as Sporting, Porto, Benifica and Braga the talent drops off big time after that.
    Last edited by james; 08-29-2012 at 03:47 AM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •