To be honest, I don't think it matters at this point. We're dealing with a club that has to hire consultants to find its coaches. We just don't have the proper management (read: Anselmi) in place capable of finding talent, let alone someone with experience. More dark clouds ahead.
Mariner never REALLY had to deal with ownership. He was an assistant. Assistants assist. They don't make choices. They don't push for changes. Rarely, anyway. Steve Nicol was boss at NE and Mariner did what he was told. Now he's been given a shot at the big job. Let's see if he has what it takes. Right now he's not doing too well - if you average out his games over a season we miss the play-offs AGAIN. And that's with the usual bump that a new coach gets when taking over a sinking ship.
My problem with Mariner is that I actually do like him. I like a lot of what he has to say. I like his passion for the game - and how he fights for the players. Good qualities in a manager. What I don't like as much is his inability to put together a squad (he brought in many of our players) and make it work. Look at our possession. I'd LOOOOOOOOOVE for Mariner to be THE MAN and for him to succeed. He's successful and we all get to wash away the filth of 6 years of failure. I just don't think the decision to promote, or side-move him, to head coach was well thought out. Just seems more of the same from TFC FO to me, and that worries the heck out of me. I'd hate to be in June of 2013 and we write off yet another season. At that point there will be a lot of bitching and moaning, but at the end of the day it's not like we can really blame Mariner - he's learning on the job.
Mariner's one shot at head coach before us didn't end very well. Not sure how that qualifies him to run our club.