Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Sweeper?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    21,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Sweeper?

    I know this will not happen, but I realy would like to see us play with a sweeper, Tebily would be perfect for the positiion, he has played in the midfield and is a solid defender ( by MLS standards).

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pickering, ON
    Posts
    15,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not sure if Tebily has the ability to lead quick-counter attacks...maybe someone like Edu?

  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North York
    Posts
    2,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CretanBull View Post
    I'm not sure if Tebily has the ability to lead quick-counter attacks...maybe someone like Edu?
    yea, makes sense if we have a sweeper


  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    man sweepers havn't been around since the 80's. Put a sweeper in and you keep the modern striker onside all the time. bad idea.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sect:121 Row 3
    Posts
    630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hurry... Hurrrrry Harrrrrd!

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    I come from the hills...
    Posts
    17,453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sweetlemon69 View Post
    man sweepers havn't been around since the 80's. Put a sweeper in and you keep the modern striker onside all the time. bad idea.

    Considering we play the offside trap like shit, why not try it out?

    I don't understand the mentality of Tebily has played DM before so he would work though... a sweeper plays BEHIND the defense, not in front. That's a stopper.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaughno View Post
    Considering we play the offside trap like shit, why not try it out?

    I don't understand the mentality of Tebily has played DM before so he would work though... a sweeper plays BEHIND the defense, not in front. That's a stopper.
    Robbo does that for us - and very effectively as well

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    I come from the hills...
    Posts
    17,453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The stopper? I agree, he does. He's actually a much better stopper than he is a true DM, IMO.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaughno View Post
    Considering we play the offside trap like shit, why not try it out?

    I don't understand the mentality of Tebily has played DM before so he would work though... a sweeper plays BEHIND the defense, not in front. That's a stopper.
    Exactly what I was thinking. You need someone quick that runs hard all the time at the back for sweeper. Tebily is not that man. Wynne, for example could potentially be a good sweeper.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    I come from the hills...
    Posts
    17,453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    But he's not strong enough in the air either. If Velez had some wheels, he would be the perfect candidate.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pachuco View Post
    Exactly what I was thinking. You need someone quick that runs hard all the time at the back for sweeper. Tebily is not that man. Wynne, for example could potentially be a good sweeper.
    I'm not crazy about the idea of playing with a sweeper but while we're on the topic....

    Wynne has the speed but not the steady foot and even steadier nerves that it takes to be a sweeper. You have to be money under pressure...EVERY TIME. There is nobody on the TFC roster that has the confidence to pull it off.

    I think TFC is better with 5 in the middle as opposed to the back.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    21,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaughno View Post
    Considering we play the offside trap like shit, why not try it out?

    I don't understand the mentality of Tebily has played DM before so he would work though... a sweeper plays BEHIND the defense, not in front. That's a stopper.

    I know, I do not care wether he plays as a classic sweeper or a stopper, but what I would like to see is a fifth man to stay back. I just would like the fifth man to move around at the back as needed and be able to contribute to building the attack. Tebily, from what I have seen, save from the speed issue, seems to have the ability to do that I would like to have them line up as this;


    ---------1------------
    -----4------14---------
    16------------------11
    --------26------------
    --------33------------
    10-------------------32
    ---------20-----------
    ---------7/9-----------

    ( I think tebily is 26)

    I do not care if it is tebily, or someone else, it is just that we have limited optitions. Edu may have the physical tools, but I am not sure he has the experience that we need at the back.
    Last edited by trane; 07-14-2008 at 12:44 PM.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •