Originally Posted by
dmacd
I'm an infrequent poster but enjoy reading this board primarily because you guys seems to be on top of TFC news before anyone else. I find myself depressed and confused reading threads like this, though. I'm sure I'll be labelled as a management plant for writing this, but I really don't get what you guys are trying to achieve with the constants threats of protest.
I've read several people in threads like this talk about how complacent supporters gets what they deserve when the team loses. I agree with this entirely when the team isn't trying. If I had an owner like Jeffrey Loria (Marlins) or Donald Sterling (Clippers), I'd be protesting and screaming bloody murder at every opportunity. Team like that (historically) lose because their owners are too cheap to invest in a winning team and quite frankly, don't try to do anything other than make money.
MLSE seems to get lumped into this because all their teams are awful. I just don't see it, though. For example:
- We couldn't attract players on a plastic pitch, so they invested in a grass pitch.
- The DP rule came into a effect and we used it to sign an exceptionally expensive (by MLS standards) DP. Although it's been a huge bust, the large majority of supporters (with some vocal exceptions) thought it was a great signing. I was really excited. Either way, MLSE tried.
- When the supporters got upset, they held town hall meetings, and I genuinely got the sense that they did their best to listen to and implement suggestions (where possible - they weren't ever going to drop their beer price, nor would any sensible team - we have to pay for Frings, Kovermans and JDG somehow).
- When we kept losing, they sacked Johnston (far too late, but still) and hired a well-respected consultant to set the team's direction. They entirely bought into his recommendations, building a coaching staff, training facility and academy system around it. We also went out and signed two more expensive DPs. Again, it's been a bust, but they tried.
- We clearly needed CBs in the off-season, so we traded for some depth players and signed two guys that they thought could be starters (Caicedo and Aceval).
In summary, we have a grass pitch, an unparelleled academy system and, I believe, the 3rd highest payroll in the league. I don't get how any of this lines up with the repeated "ML$E screwed us again and doesn't care about winning" comments. I met Tom Anselmi last year on the plane on the way down to Dallas (the 3-0 CCL win). He sat with the few supporters that came down, bought drinks us at halftime, and seemed genuinely bothered by the team's inability to make the playoffs. I've seen nothing that indicates that he's the problem.
As for the players, I've watched every game this year and, with a few exceptions, I've seen a team that put forth a good effort and lost. Sometimes they were unlucky, and sometimes they simply missed shots or screwed up on D. But, like club managment, I haven't seen a lack of effort. Quite frankly, I think we could be 4-2 if a few bounces had gone our way, but perhaps I'm fooling myself.
Either way, I don't see how protesting does anything other than: 1) demoralize players, 2) turn off the casual fan (which in turn lowers club revenue and our budget that can be spent on players) and 3) encourage short-term reactionary decisions (like the need to "start all over again" for the umpteenth time).
No one hates seeing a losing team more than me, but I'll always fault a lack of effort rather than results. As long as the team and club are giving their best effort, they'll have my support. I just don't see the point in protesting.