^ I agree, it's a totally artificial constraint. They already put their damn logo on the front, beyond that they can go fly a kite.
^ I agree, it's a totally artificial constraint. They already put their damn logo on the front, beyond that they can go fly a kite.
Originally Posted by T-boy
lol sorry i forgot to put this face in....
there jersey is to "simple" to be an mls jersey, and then new england does exactly what i said lol
Love that they put the New England flag on the kit. I would love to see the Revs do a bunch of kits with American Revolutionary flags as shadow prints on the front of the kit. With the 240th anniversary of the ARW just some 3 years off it would be a great way to promote the history of the conflict and make a few dollars as well.
Fire closing in on multiyear jersey sponsorship deal with Quaker.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...,1040470.story
Home
Away
The second one looks like Vancuver's away. I wonder if Chicago's heightened use of blue is because of our hijacking of the colour red.
Good design on the shirt. Not outstanding but better than average for adidas. Home shirt much better than white stripe Best Buy one. I was worried that there would be a big Quaker man on the front.
Shouldn't Quaker be sponsoring Philly? Actually don't mind both of these Fire kits. Like the Red home and Blue away concept instead of main colour home and white road that pretty well everyone else doesHome
Away
I'd hate to have that. Looks like a Quakes jersey.
Imagine if this cereal was still around:
TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)
New LAG kit? saw it from the Becks presser..
Love the new Galaxy jerseys
for 2012New LAG kit? saw it from the Becks presser..
Years have gone by and Ive finally learned to accept myself for who I am: a beggar for good football.
I go about the world, hand outstretched, and in the stadiums I plead: A pretty move, for the love of God.
And when good football happens, I give thanks for the miracle and I dont give a damn which team or country performs it.
-Eduardo Galeano
yeah pretty nice. I never did mind the older ones with the green and yellow
im really really disapointed with Montreal's kit. I thought they were going to have something possibly more like Inter Milan, Marseille or PSG perhaps. The jersey they went with is just so plain and not interesting.
Columbus is awful with there away kit, and the funny thing is if the top bit of the black and yellow just went all the way down the shirt, the shirt could of been pretty nice.
Seattle is horrid, and yes it should only be worn in a black light room or at a rave. Do seattle fans actually like there kits?? Do they think they look as ugly for them to wear as it is for us to see? The front office of seattle did so many right moves and helped take MLS to the next level, however design amd colours of there kits was not one of them.
Red Bulls white is so plain and the Red Bulls add is just massive and to make it even worse is they still have a smaller Red Bull crest just above the MASSIVE red bull sponsor. The dark blues are a little better in colour but again the Red Bull is just over kill. I really wish NYRB got to at least have a proper crest that looks deferent to the Red Bull sponsor.
DC United pretty nice.
Philly kit looks very south american/mexican style kit but does have quite nice colours and different from other kits in MLS.
LA Galaxy kit is very nice, a little different style this year and its even better then last years.
Chicago not bad, could be a little better but not ugly either.
Everything about New England kits is just way to American for me. And go build a new stadium you basterds!
TFC kits over the years have been pretty good , but nothing to great either. I've seen many people post simple ways to make TFC kits look the best in the league but they never seem to go that route.
In fact i see so many great designs people post on this board of teams from all across MLS that often look way better then the kits teams currently have. Most people on here come up with the ideas without even putting much thought or effort into them so it always makes me wonder why on earth do teams pay people to come up with new jersey kits when they so often come up with such ugly or plain and boring decisions? they are hiring the wrong people!
Last edited by james; 01-20-2012 at 10:01 AM.
might just be that i am not one who ever likes to wear yellow, but i just don't think watford or Lens kits are any good The only kit i saw that i could possibly see my self wearing and not looking like i just got puked on would be a Lens kit from a few years back with Red and Yellow stripes going the way of hoops, but it really just looked more like a rugby jersey.
fuckin hell that's nice!!for 2012
that's how you do a proper throwback.
in other news, it really shows the maturity of the league when you can actually call the timbers/galaxy kit a throwback.
Not bad .... expect the marks on the sash make it look like a tire tread .... as if someone has run them overfor 2012
TIFO idea for the champions league game? i'm throwing it in the official thread.Not bad .... expect the marks on the sash make it look like a tire tread .... as if someone has run them over
Are they all going to grow Fu Manchu beards and carry blue and white klingon knives?for 2012
I think that LA kit is really fuckin nice. I'm jelly.
This is what Adidas should have done for the Scottish national team. It looks alot like a belted plaid like in Rob Roy:for 2012
any news on tfcs kit? (new away I believe it is).
this is courtesy of AtlanticTFC on the BS forum
yikes
I don't particularly like it but of course I'll buy one.
this is courtesy of AtlanticTFC on the BS forum
BRUTAL ALL RED LOGO, ABSOLUTELY BRUTAL.
I like the collar on it, however I am curious to see it from the back and front. Looks ok I don't mind the all red logo its different.
Looks better in short-sleeves. Dear god that's ugly.
this is courtesy of AtlanticTFC on the BS forum
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
