shit
the
bed
dissapointed to come back from the pub and see this.
hope you lads in toronto are dealing with this in typical (drunk) fashion.
ill be back in canada next week to join you.
shit
the
bed
dissapointed to come back from the pub and see this.
hope you lads in toronto are dealing with this in typical (drunk) fashion.
ill be back in canada next week to join you.
NOTICE: Wager with STB: OVER 2 shots on goal in the First half wins a Pint at HT.
I feel like 90 today, I think the beer was poisoned last night...
And I have a job, with a super cool TFC lovin' boss.
Weekend hippie, to be sure...
By the way, slightly off topic, but did anyone else see Alan Gordon hanging out in the smoking area last night (gate 3). I guess he was in town ahead of time for San Jose this weekend. He totally looked like a hippie, wearing one of those Rasta hair nets...
Fair enough. Its football though, and results are never a sure thing.
Now, I think our backline needs to sharpen up because that is what is killing us. As for Dallas, sometimes its the the devil you know vs the devil you don't. They are a good side that made the finals that know how to play us. The 1-0 result definently makes it seem like we should have taken at least a draw though.
Stop making sense, God-damn it! This is where we're supposed to yell nonsensical things about not winning a game nobody expected us to!!
I was there, we panicked every time someone put a bit of pressure on us for some reason. Not many people looked comfortable on the ball and we have little to no penetration without Koevermans up front. Borman has to go. He can't play full back, he can't play wing back. He makes me miss Nick Garcia who was serviceable at left back once he was moved away from the centre.
Positives: Morgan seemed up for it when he came on, Harden seemed solid, we were two brain farts away from a draw (Johnston losing his man for the goal and Borman with a terrible play for the penalty). Oh and we got to go to the food hall at half-time.
Last edited by Wull; 08-25-2011 at 02:22 PM.
TFC v Dallas - Photo Blog
http://viewfromthesouthstands.com/20...as-photo-blog/
A post featuring some of the twenty nine photos I took at the replay of the TFC v Dallas Champions League match early Thursday morning at BMO Field.
So, we needed the win but didn't expect to win? All this talk about sending a message to MLSE (not from you) is a function of being rational about the likelihood of winning? Simply just a result of a need unfulfilled?
3 points would definitely help the campaign. I wouldn't call them essential.
Tauro v Pumas happens tonight. If there is a draw there, we'd be 2 points clear, alone in 2nd with 4 games left. Regardless, even if there are 3 points awarded we'd be tied in 2nd with the victor.
If there was a tie breaker, we currently hold that with Tauro since it is points earned in games head to head, Goal differential in matches involving the two teams, then away goals involving the 2 teams (which we have 2 of). We have an advantage over Tauro as it stands now if we ended tied with them.
Arguably, this comes down to Dallas winning the group and whether we can beat out Pumas.
I get the disappointment with not winning. And there is a place for it.
But all this talk (again, not you) about writing off the team is laughable considering the big picture.
I hope nobody is too surprised. I haven't seen anything in our previous performances that suggested that we'd be pushing to beat Dallas.
What I want to see for the remainder of the season is the same: start picking up points at a higher rate than we did previously and show overall improvement.
We lose a a lot having Frings in the back and not the midfield. His strength is in mid and we have nobody that we can fully trust for the back. So we have Frings and somebody else. Our options are Henry, harden, and Iro, 2 of these 3 guys. Not very commanding in my opinion. Also we don't have a target striker(Koevermans injured?). Plata, Marsosevic and Johnson, like to drift out wide and when a team packs 9 behind the ball in the box, we lack in the final 3rd. When Frings was moved to mid it was much better but too late. I haven't watched many games at BMO this year with my schedule, but it is very obvious we are still a few players short. Sure we will do well in some games, but the norm will be similar to today. Possession is ok, lacking in the final third.
Same here. This has consistently been my stance since day one of this season. It was clear this team was not going to compete out of the gate - all I wanted to see was sustained improvement, and some smart player tranactions during the season that showed the building of a proper, balanced team. I think we've seen some of both, though the season isn't over, and there is still a lot of work to be dne (particularly on defense).
Hopefully my patience is rewarded, because the alternative is that we start over... again.
- Scott
Heroism breaks its heart, and idealism its back, on the intransigence of the credulous and the mediocre, manipulated by the cynical and the corrupt. ~Christopher Hitchens
its going to be another rebulid this winter.we need a whole new backline and that AM.
will will this ever stop.
I don't know what some people are smoking in here but i thought stinson was one of the worst players on the pitch. He did nothing encouraging and was reponsable for the 1st goal. I really hope him and Zav are gone next year. I see absolutely nothing in them. As for the group, there still 4 games remaning, which is 12 points, so people come down, things happen.
what i meant was that we needed a win and this was one of the easiest places to get it outside of tauro. we've been abysmal on the road and the bulk of us don't see any points coming from any matches against the pumas.
i think you're oversimplifying the statistic as to where we're coming from. just because we may be 2 points clear, or tied with the victor doesn't take into account the upcoming schedule where we may find ourselves dropping points to both pumas and dallas, ya know?
Stinson is developing. He made mistakes (normal for development) and he also made some key tackles and won the ball against the mop head.
He is improving and is already much better on the field than in his first game.
If Toronto can at least raise him to a solid MLS calibre player we can trade him (sweeten the deal) for something valuable, and we didn't pay anything for him.
On a side note: does Winter sound like he is sick? crappy for him since he can't really call in sick if he is really not feeling well..
Last edited by nickio; 08-25-2011 at 04:18 PM.
They're voting for his work ethic. He was quite poor today.
He's a good prospect, though. His biggest weakness seems to be his passing. Leaves a lot of balls short, doesn't have much control. But he sees the pitch well and moves into space well. Getting rid of an 18 year old with his upside would be foolish to the extreme.
TFC Loses To Dallas in CCL Replay
http://viewfromthesouthstands.com/2011/08/ccl-replay/
In this post game video blog after TFC's loss to FC Dallas in the replay of the abandoned game from Wednesday I take a look at the following:
* Ten points is still the threshold that Toronto FC needs to get over to have a chance of qualifying for the knockout stages of the Champions League. I look at what Thursday's loss means to the math and to their prospects.
* I lament the fact that Danny Koevermans might have been the difference Thursday if he was available to play
* I ask if it is still worth playing Torsten Frings at the back
* And I take a look ahead to the San Jose game, the return of four former Reds and towards the upcoming International break
You think the 3rd overall team in the MLS is an easy place to get points?
Even if the point is that Dallas were easy relative to Pumas, ultimately if Pumas and Dallas are the better teams going into this then they will emerge from the group stage unless we can pull off a miracle.
It's ok to want a miracle. That said, to get pissed off and down on the team when it doesn't happen is illogical isn't it?
I have no idea what kind of team Pumas is. Never saw them. I have no idea what their travel schedule is like, whether key players are injured, whether they themselves are focused on the CCL, etc. It would be a little silly of me to then conclude that we won't be able to beat or draw them.
We didn't need to go "all in" on the Dallas game. There are quite a few hands left.
No, not by definition. It depends why they're pissed off. It's one thing to expect another team to win because of performance to date, it's another to assume that domination is so complete that their opponents' lack of contribution is never a factor.
Our work ethic was shit for the first 70 minutes. We closed slowly, moved little or poorly off the ball and didn't switch play frequently, even though it was obvious we needed to create more space.
I expect to lose to a better team, sure. But if it's not accompanied by the kind of effort required to occasionally upset a better team, then it's entirely rational to get pissed off.
He caused the first nights goal, they were just running done his right side the whole night 45 mins. I mean he was passed numerous times and they were just playing longball the whole time, knowing his weakness. For the life of me I do not know why Henry and Morgan were not starters!..They are not timid and have the speed and strength to progress. As soon as I saw our backline I knew our night was predictable and a night that we would be on our heels. Our backend is in shambles!
ALL HELL'S BROKEN LOOSEhttp://gfycat.com/SharpKindArrowana
After all the freakouts this is the best analysis I've read....and it makes a LOT of sense...as dismayed as I am with our offence, Plata's sudden non-vision, poor crosses to who? This confused backline I imagine is THE place for improvement. Refreshing read rather than rhetoric.
ALL HELL'S BROKEN LOOSEhttp://gfycat.com/SharpKindArrowana
what pissed me off,other then a lack of talent.
was the lack of effort they displyed last night and this morn.
I agree on the assessment of the defense as the achilles that hasn't been resolved. We have enough attacking options and midfielders that we don't need to keep the revolving door going in those positions. But on defense, I'd ditch Borman and sign a decent experienced left back. I'd also sign a good CB who can pass (and doesn't resort to hoofing it up the pitch nervously under the slightest pressure). Eckersley is fine for MLS and Cann or Williams will be fine at CB if they have a good partner. Beyond that, I think it's time to settle down the roster and go with this bunch.
also i dont see how anyone could possibly say we play anything like last year at this time. We are clearly more organized and capable of scoring goals.
I definitely agree with Borman (and have been saying so for a while). Hes actually decent going forward so id keep him for that at a low price but we definitely need a left back. Shit id like to see Viator there (or at CB) at least to see what dude can do.
the absolute last thing we need is another new coach and another year of new players etc. What we have is a great start and will we see ieven better next year.
Who is #18? I can't believe that classless piss stain fired the ball into the stands after the final whistle like that. He deserves a coin in the temple plain and simple.