Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 132
  1. #61
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    t.dot
    Posts
    7,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    sad to see him go...think he would have made a good backup just on merit and wanting to play for the badge. didn't fit in winter's system but always worked his butt off

  2. #62
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    112
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trane View Post
    Yes your thoughts are in line with a professional coaching staff that has won three games.

    Why use Ekersley at CB? Because being as solid as possible in the midle is important, if you have a weaker player you are better off putting him to the side of goal as opposed to infront of goal. Ekersley has the size to play CB and is as good a defender as we have, therefore that professional coaching staff decided to put him in the midle in front of goal.

    It is silly to keep a defensive liability as big as Harden on the roster just for the sake of a having someone on the roster. Not that Gargan was much better, I would just cut Harden first, as he has shown me that he is useless at CB.

    AND the diffrence between wingbacks and fullbacks is not sematics, when a team says that it plays with fullbacks it generaly means that its two side backs play a more traditional defensive role, while wingbacks start from just about the same spot but play much more offensively. Clearly there is some convergance between the two roles, but we clearly play with fullbacks and not wingbacks.
    Won 3 professional games, how many has any of us won?

    I never said Eck's wasn't cut out to play CB, but he's more effective at RB. Can't you see that I said that? He's better than Viator at RB, can't you see that I said that too? I don't know why you're arguing about Ecks ability to play CB, I wasn't disputing his ability to I was pointing out the lack of players on our roster that can actually play CB. We don't need to do what we did earlier by playing midfielders (Tchani) at CB, that did not look good at all. I'll take Harden over someone who hasn't played CB professionally, ever.

    Borman is a liability, Santos is a liability as seen in KC, why not just cut em too eh?

    What are we gonna do if Eck's gets hurt and we have 3 matches in a week, put Iro/Henry out there for 3 matches in 7 with absolutely NOTHING on the bench to back that up? That's just stupid!

    Wingbacks, fullbacks, doesn't matter what they are or what they have, it's entirely irrelevant to what we were talking about anyways, so who cares.
    Last edited by ryan; 07-26-2011 at 05:12 PM.

  3. #63
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    21,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ Harden looks like he has never played CB professionaly either.

  4. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryan View Post
    Won 3 professional games, how many has any of us won?
    I fucking hate when people make points like this.

    Why even bother having a forum if that's the case?
    Last edited by menefreghista; 07-26-2011 at 05:58 PM.

  5. #65
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    112
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trane View Post
    ^ Harden looks like he has never played CB professionaly either.
    While funny and amusing, it's not true and doesn't change the fact that he is.

    Quote Originally Posted by menefreghista View Post
    I fucking hate when people make points like this.

    Why even bother having a forum if that's the case?
    The point was to say they know lots bout footie, more than we can know as fans, not to say he shouldn't say anything at all. I was just implying that the logic I presented was in line with their decision making and wasn't. It gave plausible reasoning for why things are they way they are, why I think Gargan was ok to release and Harden isn't. What's the bloody big deal?

    Easy on the dramatics.

  6. #66
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    21,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ I had this debate before, just because you call someone a CB, does not mean that he realy is. That is my issue with Harden, his every instict seems to be the opposite of what a professional CB would have.

  7. #67
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by swan View Post
    some of you can bitch about his skills but the guy did play his balls off for us unlike so many that have not..

    i for one wish him the best
    Couldn't agree more.

  8. #68
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    any idea what Winter means by, "I'll speak about Dan Gargan when everything's approved" ??

  9. #69
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Kitchener - Section 116 Row 6
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I personally think that means its a trade more then Garg's just being released.

  10. #70
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    116
    Posts
    868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^ Can anyone confirm if Santos was at practise yesterday?

  11. #71
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CommradePolski View Post
    I personally think that means its a trade more then Garg's just being released.
    The Fan is reporting he got traded to Chicago

  12. #72
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    KW
    Posts
    2,419
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For?????????????

    That is the question

  13. #73
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Downtown Toronto
    Posts
    4,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    probably for a supplementary draft pick.

  14. #74
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    764
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Traded. Change the thread title!

    torontofc Toronto FC



    NEW: #TorontoFC trades Dan Gargan to Chicago for Dasan Robinson -> http://bit.ly/nkpsBR .. #TFC #MLS

  15. #75
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    116
    Posts
    868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting...Any opinions on this kid? I have no idea if this is an upgrade or just a bench player swap

  16. #76
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasan_Robinson

    bizarre. Hometown boy who's been with the first team since '06!!!

    but nobody's heard of him?
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  17. #77
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Kitchener - Section 116 Row 6
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Best of luck to the Gargan in the windy city.

  18. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The trade is Gargan + a 2nd round pick for Robinson.

    According to Molinaro we actually did release Gargan. But the Fire showed interest so we rescinded the release. And now made the trade.

    http://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/stor...fc-gargan.html

    According to Ives: Shrewd move by TFC. I think Robinson will be major upgrade in the back
    Last edited by menefreghista; 07-28-2011 at 10:41 AM.

  19. #79
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 111 Row 8
    Posts
    9,069
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.chicago-fire.com/player/dasan-robinson

    Defender... total 248 minutes played this season.. rarely gets a game
    RPB Road Warrior: supporting Toronto FC anywhere on planet earth

    TM: YYZ Red Patch Army #18, FC

  20. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    According to the MLS PA, Robinson is making $97,500.

  21. #81
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Frozen Swampland
    Posts
    17,369
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    a bit of head scratcher as I think this is more of a sideways move... I don't recall Dasan Robinson being particularly outstanding. Or does Mariner see more than I do? (hopefully!)
    “Years have gone by and I’ve finally learned to accept myself for who I am: a beggar for good football.

    I go about the world, hand outstretched, and in the stadiums I plead: ‘A pretty move, for the love of God.’

    And when good football happens, I give thanks for the miracle and I don’t give a damn which team or country performs it.”

    -Eduardo Galeano

  22. #82
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe Chicago puts much value in the 2nd round pick and if that's the case, it's possible that this was a decent trade. Can't fault Mariner yet. Seems most of his trades have been hits.

  23. #83
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    17,113
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Robinson can play wide with the ball, can play centrally, has better movement. He's never been able to nail down a starting spot, but the guys ahead of him have been impressive. But he's very versatile, so that's probably why they like him.

    Chicago just resigned him to a new deal a few months ago, so I'm a bit surprised. He might have demanded a move for playing time.

    Update: Some fire fans seem to like him. He'd apparently won the starting centre half job in 2008, then had a hernia that required surgery and he lost most of the season, as well as his spot to Bakare Soumare. Then they brought in Segares, and he hasn't had a sniff since, basically.
    Last edited by jloome; 07-28-2011 at 10:59 AM.

  24. #84
    RPB Member
    Past President

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,065
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thank you dan gargan for all your awesome, super long foul throw-ins.

  25. #85
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    www.RedNationOnline.ca
    Posts
    4,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Robinson > Gargan

    That is all

  26. #86
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    112
    Posts
    2,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hope they see something in him, he makes double what Gargan makes so he better provide more on the pitch.

  27. #87
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ossington Ave
    Posts
    8,607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    think he only makes 20k more than what Gargan made.
    What position in defense is he natural to?
    Will he step right into the line up?

  28. #88
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    2,753
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So he wasn't released?

    So once again we get the first story, not the correct one?

    Take care Dan. You wore the number 8 with pride.

  29. #89
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    West Hill
    Posts
    1,128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canadian_bhoy View Post
    Thank you dan gargan for all your awesome, super long foul throw-ins.

    tee hee - that was funnnnnnny.

  30. #90
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gazza View Post
    So he wasn't released?

    So once again we get the first story, not the correct one?

    Take care Dan. You wore the number 8 with pride.
    He was released. But I guess when Chicago got wind they decided they wanted him.

    So TFC rescinded the release.

    And then he was traded.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •