Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    West Siiiiide
    Posts
    24,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You can't "split" the 200 metre time my friend. Anyone who has had any experience with track knows that the 200 metre times are "faster" because there is no "start" lag in the 2nd half of the 200 metre. That's why the Olympic qualifying time for the 200...that is the bare minimum to compete in the games...is 20.59 and the overall world record is 19.32 a full 2 seconds (and then some!) under Wynne's time. Are you telling me for the 100 metre he is barely Olympic qualifying but for the 200 metre he is so much slower? I will buy that Wynne has sub-11 time but I highly doubt he is near Olympic qualifying.

  2. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roogsy View Post
    You can't "split" the 200 metre time my friend. Anyone who has had any experience with track knows that the 200 metre times are "faster" because there is no "start" lag in the 2nd half of the 200 metre. That's why the Olympic qualifying time for the 200...that is the bare minimum to compete in the games...is 20.59 and the overall world record is 19.32 a full 2 seconds (and then some!) under Wynne's time. Are you telling me for the 100 metre he is barely Olympic qualifying but for the 200 metre he is so much slower? I will buy that Wynne has sub-11 time but I highly doubt he is near Olympic qualifying.
    I think you just blew my mind Roogsy.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •