Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 48 of 48
  1. #31
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carefree View Post
    I know this was the rumoured format for a while, but I was really hoping the powers that be would change their minds on this and keep the home-away format. this means we probably won't play the Limp Act this year.
    I agree. I'm not a big fan of the new changes either and wish we just continued with the previous round-robin scheme and added Edmonton to that. Playing the new club (Edmonton) is cool and all, but not getting to play Montreal is shitty IMO.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  2. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mayne Island, BC
    Posts
    2,265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldtimer View Post
    In Europe it's not done in the final, but both the UEFA CL and the FA Cup use it in the lower stages.
    Um, yeah, that's my point.

  3. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    11,699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashcleaner View Post
    I agree. I'm not a big fan of the new changes either and wish we just continued with the previous round-robin scheme and added Edmonton to that. Playing the new club (Edmonton) is cool and all, but not getting to play Montreal is shitty IMO.
    Agreed...

  4. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Pub.
    Posts
    8,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I HATED the round robin format for a tornament this small - so I like the change...

    I wish it was a one-game final instead of a 2-game aggregate...

    If we drop any points to Edmonton, hell hath nothing on what will go on here LOL
    "...Money wasn't tight, but it like, it wasn't right..."


  5. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    in your head
    Posts
    9,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't have a preference either way.... as long as we win it.

    What I find interesting is that all 4 teams are in great states of flux right now.

    Edmonton and TFC had coaching changes.
    Vancouver is up to a new league, with a very different roster than last year... TFC dumped a shitload of players (but has more players coming back than Vancouver). Edmonton has a skeleton roster and is playing in a formal league for the first time. Montreal probably is probably the most stable, but even they made a lot of roster changes and are playing in a newly configured league as well, thinking about moving up to MLS.

    I think it's a bit of a crapshoot this year. Vancouver would seem to have the advantage over Montreal, but I wonder if Tater Tots will have them gelled by the time they play Montreal. Montreal's core has played together a lot. Toronto has the talent advantage over Edmonton and Montreal but maybe not Vancouver, but Vancouver needs to find chemistry in a hurry (and a striker).
    Last edited by rocker; 02-19-2011 at 12:10 PM.

  6. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Der Torontör Weg.
    Posts
    18,574
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I prefer this format, it is more fitting for a Cup competition. Though there are only a few teams at the moment, it sets a good precedence for the future. No longer will there be issues of losing the title to a team that never beat you (2008), or relying on victories by other teams in other matches (2009). Each team is responsible for their own fate.
    Animals Eaten:
    pig, cow, lamb, moose, chicken, quail, kudu, ostrich, kangaroo, octopus, alligator, rabbit, shark, springbok, goat, bison, boar, caterpillars, turkey, fish, lobster, crab, oyster, prawn, antelope, camel, eel, squid

  7. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Has there been any word on TV coverage for this? On the plus side, the opening round lends itself nicely to doubleheader coverage - Montreal early game/Edmonton last game in week one, and Toronto early, Vancouver late in week two.

    Sportsnet has done the coverage of the NCC in the past - I wonder if they will do it this year?

  8. #38
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    low earth orbit
    Posts
    5,517
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    will the 'away goals rule' be in effect ?

    Also, since the 'higher ranked' team in the final gets choice of where to play the first game, why not just have the final as a one-off affair at the highest ranked finalist's field ?

    done, and done.
    a ha ha heh he hoo.. ha

  9. #39
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ The away goals rule applies in the NCC and also in the CCL. Just not in MLS.
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  10. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    West Siiiiide
    Posts
    24,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldtimer View Post
    2-legged is more fair, and is done world-wide, except so much in North America.

    2 legged finals are not done world-wide. There are places in this world that do them, but they are few and far between. Most places do a single-game final and frankly, that is what I would prefer. There is an excitement to a final game that is difficult to generate for a two-legged system. And as long as it's in a neutral venue, it's pretty fair.

  11. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyone know which games are included in which half-season pack?

  12. #42
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,080
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hope Montreal beat the Whitecaps. Looking forward to a TFC Road Trip to montreal


    RoadTrips:Columbus/Vancouver/Montreal/Columbus/NewYork/Montreal/
    RPBScarf:2015/2019/2023

  13. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,906
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Antonio Gramsci View Post
    So, there goes the idea of linking a Nutrilite final with Canada Day. The Canada Day weekend now sees both Vancouver and Toronto idle - what genius scheduled their match for June 29th when July 1-2 was open for both teams?
    The NCC needs to be completed by early June for CONCACAF purposes.

    As for the scheduling of TFC vs. Vancouver on June 29, that was likely a TSN decision, as they are busy with CFL on Canada Day.

  14. #44
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^There we go. The First time TSN chooses CFL over us. I'm counting.
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  15. #45
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    they could stick us on TSN2 ...

    and I guess I should remind folks....cowgirls

    I am an Online Pole
    RPB Twitter and Facebook Bitch (http://www.twitter.com/redpatchboys)
    Pride...Passion...Purpose...and DRANK

  16. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,878
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOBOR THE GREAT ! View Post
    Also, since the 'higher ranked' team in the final gets choice of where to play the first game, why not just have the final as a one-off affair at the highest ranked finalist's field ?
    I'm fairly certain that the reason this format was choosen was because it keeps the NCC at 6 games (the same as last year). Going to a single game final would mean one less game, one less game to sell to TV, fans and advertisers.

  17. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashcleaner View Post
    I agree. I'm not a big fan of the new changes either and wish we just continued with the previous round-robin scheme and added Edmonton to that. Playing the new club (Edmonton) is cool and all, but not getting to play Montreal is shitty IMO.

  18. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Stoke-on-Toronto
    Posts
    8,800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Damnit I wanted to cheer for Edmonton atleast once...

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •