Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 227
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,263
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Rogers to buy MLSE Sports Operations?


  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    327
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You kidding me? They'll budget cut more than MLSE does already.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Centre of the Universe
    Posts
    1,575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    rogers said they'll spend money on the jays and be willing to take losses, I wouldn't mind Rogers taking over. Not like they can do much worse on the ice/court/field.

    i wonder if peddie's retirement is related to this
    Last edited by dclaro; 12-01-2010 at 01:53 AM.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFCRegina View Post
    The thing is, Toronto FC moves down another slot in the pecking order given that Rogers owns the Blue Jays.

    It's tough to know what the implications will be for TFC unless it happens and we actually see it play out. Very little precedent for this type of thing, especially in a larger market. As a Jays fan myself, I'm less than enamored with Rogers to this point, but time will tell I suppose.

    I expect some TFC games will likely be played at Rogers Centre now (maybe large international friendlies, or special one off games like Toronto/Montreal for the first time in Toronto once they join MLS).

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,882
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I mean really, can they do any worse?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wow. Cash of Titans.

    That's an interesting story. Top Torstar biz writers names on it, so it has traction.

    May well be sparked by Rogers impending sense that the Blue Jays probably aren't going to grow significantly in years to come, hence the pre-emptive buy out of MLSE. Even bagging a maxed-out Leafs team would represent new business growth for Rogers.

    The other foot to fall in this scenario would be the acquisition of(Chris Berman voice) A National (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) Football (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) League (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) franchise by Rogers. And the building of a new Dallas Death Star-type stadium to house it. Oooh. That's where we'll see TFC play Barca someday.

    Or Spurs.

    In the meantime, might also get to see the Leafs playing their Winter Classic at Skydome with the roof open.

    And the Argos? As Mott The Pringle might have sung:

    It's a mighty long way down the dusty trail
    and the sun burns hot on the cold steel rail
    and I look like a bum
    and I crawl like a snail
    (da-da dadadadadadadada)
    All the way to Moncton

    Wow. We'll need a Steinbrenner to run this show.
    Last edited by greatwhitenorf; 12-01-2010 at 02:24 AM.

  7. #7
    El Patron
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Does this mean Tom "dumbass" Anselmi will be gone too?

  8. #8
    El Patron
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh and please let us hope TFC doesnt end up playing on a pointy ball shared surface!

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorf View Post
    Wow. Cash of Titans.

    The other foot to fall in this scenario would be the acquisition of(Chris Berman voice) A National (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) Football (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) League (dah-dah-dah-dunnhh!) franchise by Rogers.
    Doesn't NFL rules prohibit corporate ownership of teams?

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NFL rules do prohibit corporate ownership. Rogers will just stick some puppet in there to do their bidding.

    I nominate Jim Lang. On the payroll, not doing anything important.

  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    rogers field does not have that bad a ring

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sportsnet Skydome.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Robo France 2000
    Posts
    1,808
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wonder if they'll look to divest themselves of TFC if the deal goes through?

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Damn! This news certainly has certainly caught me by surprise. Never thought we'd see the day.

  15. #15
    Mikey
    Guest

    Default

    I doubt this would change any of the losers running TFC at day to day management level.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Whitby Ontario
    Posts
    1,629
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Where the hell did that come from? That sounds like it would be great, but I have one huge problem from the top of my head.

    It said it wouldn't buy property.

    That would include projects in the planning stages. Like the soccer training center. That will probally get put on hold until MLSE is either sold, or they reject a deal. Even if Rogers did buy it, let's say in a year or two, when the center is finished. If they dont buy the buildings, then the academy will take a nosedive.

    If the jays were a winning team, I would say sure. But I prefer the devil I know, to the devil I don't.

  17. #17
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    East Side
    Posts
    572
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think it is a good idea that one company owns all but one of the sports franchises in the city.

    Better the devil you do know than the devil you don't.

  18. #18
    Mikey
    Guest

    Default

    If the idea is to find a way to leverage more money from the Leafs than MLSE currently can, moving the Jays out to somewhere new ( smaller ) then refurbisihing the dome into a "new" 60,000 seat home for the leafs and national hockey team would make more sense.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Poshawa
    Posts
    13,558
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I heard this on the FAN590 this morning...interesting bit of news and I am sure all the media outlets will pick this up today.....I can't wait to see how this plays out.
    Follow me...... https://twitter.com/#!/aGeRoO76
    "Just like JDG. It wasn't a post-and-in shot, but JDG is smart & experienced" - Carts

  20. #20
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    low earth orbit
    Posts
    5,517
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's a mighty long way down the dusty trail
    and the sun burns hot on the cold steel rail
    and I look like a bum
    and I crawl like a snail
    (da-da dadadadadadadada)
    All the way to Moncton
    Mott the Hoople
    a ha ha heh he hoo.. ha

  21. #21
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    low earth orbit
    Posts
    5,517
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ageroo View Post
    I heard this on the FAN590 this morning...interesting bit of news and I am sure all the media outlets will pick this up today.....I can't wait to see how this plays out.
    This is all over everywhere right now. Talk of a media monopoly with the eventual acquisition of HNIC - lumping Leafs, Raptors, TFC all onto one channel and charging whatever they want for it because they can.

    Poor, poor TSN... we hardly knew ye.
    a ha ha heh he hoo.. ha

  22. #22
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this has nothing to do with Peddie retiring...also 1.3 billion is the number I've heard is the what teachers pension would expect and sell at or around.

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ossington Ave
    Posts
    8,607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    och i fucking hope not, i cant think of a worse ownership

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Halton Hills
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm scratching my head on this one.
    Hard to imagine that this corporate giant will get us footy fans. They are a baseball bunch, will they cater to the tourists that buy tickets to Jays games? Will their desire for a NFL franchise dominate all other considerations? Will they have the "touch" when it comes to Toronto FC? Is the best scenario be that they buy all the teams and then sell off the ones that don't play on ice?

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Big front page spread in The Star today. $1.3B bid for the Teachers' Pension Plan's 66% stake.

  26. #26
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On the Interwebs
    Posts
    18,710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Be careful what you wish for

    Quote Originally Posted by Ossington Mental Youth View Post
    och i fucking hope not, i cant think of a worse ownership
    Exactly.

    ML$E replaces a faceless pension fund with a faceless cable and wireless giant.

    Rogers doesn't give a crap about winning. The Jays have gone no-where under their ownership. All they want is "content" to fill their cable channels.

    Since Jays viewership is down, adding ML$E's properties gives them material to place on their stations. Nothing more.

    If you think it was bad under the Teachers' ownership, you ain't seen nothin' yet.
    MLS is a tough, physical league, that emphasizes speed, and features plastic fields, grueling travel, extreme weather, and incompetent refs. - NK Toronto

  27. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Watching Ottawa Fury FC when not hanging off the top of Section 110 at BMO!
    Posts
    3,224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So... this would make the Argo's the "bastard child" so to speak on the Toronto Professional sports scene?

  28. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The teachers have been selling off other assets lately, so they're likely going to sell to someone - if not Rogers, then who? Is there anyone else in this market interested in owning pro sports teams?

  29. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Downtown TO.
    Posts
    988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My main worry is where TFC eventually ends up on their list of priorities. With a buy of this size I suspect that it will be status quo for a while meaning, whatever is supposed to be going on with Klinsmann and finding the style of this team will continue. But eventually Rogers will turn their collective attention to 'that soccer team', and who knows what comes next.

  30. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,191
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That is a big number. Videotron bid huge for the Habs last year ($550 million) and lost. The final price for the Habs was $575 million, about 50% more than the $350-400 million Gillett had originally expected to get. Rogers is trying to knock out any other bidders. It's not likely in this case, because of the bigger amounts, that anyone can pull together a syndicate to compete with a phone company, the way the Molsons did. But it's not a knockout bid, yet. If someone comes in with a partner to take the real estate, that would be the vastly preferred option. Keeping ACC doesn't make sense for MLSE.

    Why Rogers? Sports team content will become a "magic app" on mobile devices, i.e. something only you can offer that competitors can't compete with. Expect to see Bell jump into this before it's over.

    Why now? Rogers execs must be really getting worried that the some or all of the new entrants will really impact (ie lower) mobile pricing.

    Calling Jim Balsillie. Anybody there?
    Last edited by ensco; 12-01-2010 at 08:51 AM.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •