Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default ML$E: Profits > Winning

    ESPN ranked every single major team (MLS not included) from North America and ranked them based on Bang for the Buck, Fan Relations, Ownership, Affordability, Stadium Experience, Players, Coaching and Title Track.
    http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/teamrankings

    Take a wild guess how ML$E owned teams preformed (out of 122 teams)

    113. Toronto Raptors
    121. Toronto Maple Leafs (thats right, second to last)

    Insight from ESPN how ML$E runs the Leafs:
    Last Year's Rank: 120
    Title Track: 112
    Ownership: 95
    Coaching: 86
    Players: 109
    Fan Relations: 109
    Affordability: 122
    Stadium Experience: 102
    Bang for the Buck: 122
    Good news for Leafs fans: It's still more expensive (on average) to attend a Patriots home game, $90.89 to $88.32. The bad news? The Pats are, um, good. With the costliest ticket in the NHL ($39.60 above the league average) and the steepest hot dogs ($4.76), soft drinks ($4.01) and parking ($20.04), it's no wonder fans feel abused. After his team fell out of playoff contention for the third consecutive season, GM/Public Enemy No. 1 John Ferguson Jr. was replaced by interim suit Cliff Fletcher in January, offering Toronto faithful some hope. Unfortunately for Fletcher and fans alike, several key (and high-priced) players, including captain Mats Sundin, refused to waive no-trade clauses at the Feb. 26 deadline, making rebuilding a winner an exercise in futility (and sending the Players ranking down 37 slots this year).
    http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/st...chise08rank121

    And how they run the Raptors
    Last Year's Rank: 105
    Title Track: 121
    Ownership: 100
    Coaching: 115
    Players: 117
    Fan Relations: 108
    Affordability: 112
    Stadium Experience: 98
    Bang for the Buck: 82
    THIS IS THE FUTURE OF TORONTO FC. Dead last in championships, dead last in fan relations, dead last in affordability, dead last in fan relations, dead last in stadium experience.

    It's not funny any more, its actually getting really scary. Toronto FC is the first ML$E team that I've ever cared for and seeing the ML$E track record really doesn't give me any confidence in ML$E as owners.

    Its time for ML$E to have some fucking integrity and to stop treating TFC fans as an additional revenue stream. Be content with the hundreds of millions you're making off of the Leafs and the Raptors and let us be the low-profit winning franchise. Freeze ticket prices, drop concession prices, make parking cheaper. For fuck's sake, if we won something, we would gladly pay for an increase. But we haven't won anything. We've shat the bed year after miserable year. What are we paying more for?

    If anyone is going to the Town Hall, please bring this up. This is our future. And if it comes down to deciding between mortgage payments and the team we love, we all know which one we're going to pick.

  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    parkdale
    Posts
    2,993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this is our future? given that article seems to be talking about cliff fletcher and mats sundin, i'd suggest that's our present. though i doubt things have improved in the affordability stakes, for the team, they followed this period by going out and getting brian burke and letting him do his thing. hopefully we get something like that as well.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The point is not really about the specifics relating to why the Toronto Maple Leafs, and while tempting to talk about it, my post really wasn't about TML at all.

    The ESPN write up is about short term factors; but fan relations, stadium experience, affordability are all things that are controlled by the executives upstairs, not the GMs or coaches

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    scarborough
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DichioTFC View Post
    THIS IS THE FUTURE OF TORONTO FC. Dead last in championships, dead last in fan relations, dead last in affordability, dead last in fan relations, dead last in stadium experience.
    at least they have the best sports bar!!

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Apparently its the only place in town where you can get *real* sports.

    Drinks there cost as much as they do in BMO!!

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Section 110 - 1/2 the time :)
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The worrying comparison imo is with the Raptors.

    In 15 years MLSE has paid into the luxury tax ZERO TIMES.

    Every year you have in the range of 8-15 teams who pay the luxury tax. All of the big franchises - Lakers, Boston, Knicks will pay the tax and so will ambitious owners of other teams - Dallas, Portland, Denver, Cleveland, etc.

    The thing is the ROI on being a luxury tax team isn't great as a lot of those teams are still stuck as being treadmill 1st/2nd round playoff teams. Hell some don't make the playoffs.

    But to win it all you need to enter that world.

    MLSE won't do it. They'd rather just spend to the salary cap limit and max out a low variance yearly return.

    I think you can make the same analogy with a $5 million DP. To get into that game (NY, LA) you have to be willing to lay down serious payroll with no lead pipe lock guarantee that it will lead to a better ROI.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Stoke-on-Toronto
    Posts
    8,800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    well it's not really our future. toronto fc can't get away with being awful for years upon years and still manage to sell tickets, merchandise, etc etc.

    atleast thats the way it looks to me.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You doubt ML$E.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brooker View Post
    well it's not really our future. toronto fc can't get away with being awful for years upon years and still manage to sell tickets, merchandise, etc etc.

    atleast thats the way it looks to me.

    Sure, TFC could be an average MLS team, selling whatever the league average is, being in the middle of the table most years - once in a while rising into the top half and playing some playoff games and once in a while dropping to the bottom. They might even luck their way into the odd MLS Cup and they may even win one, Kansas City won one.

    Of course, TFC could have become a dynasty, that's what's so frustrating.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Let's assume TFC is now included in the list. My take:

    Last Year's Rank: NA
    Title Track: 115
    Ownership: 97
    Coaching: 121
    Players: 114
    Fan Relations: 122
    Affordability: 40 (I'm gonna catch heat for this, but TFC is way cheaper than Leafs/Raps)
    Stadium Experience: 15
    Bang for the Buck: 70

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dude, I would say you're off with players (give them a slight increase to maybe 100), fan relations (110), affordability (watching sports at other places is *ridiculously* cheap, like the cost of a movie ticket, i give TFC 80 at best), stadium experience (35), and bang for the buck (85)

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    4,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    stadium experience includes amenities but also 80,000+ cheering together. its an *insane* feeling when something like that happens. like when University of Michigan scores a touchdown in 121,000 seat Michigan Stadium (not professional team, I know, but still) or Mexico scores a goal in 101,000 seat Azteca

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    GUELPH
    Posts
    900
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    We TFC fans are different then our Leaf Brotheren I think we will not accept inconsistancy that much longer. I hope that we tfc fans send a message out to the ML$E front office by not renewing seasons maybe not attending the last 2 games of the season etc. I think that will be the only way improvement will occur.`

    WEAR GREEN

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •