Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 163
  1. #31
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northwest Territories (Section 226)
    Posts
    8,321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    Passing success rate:

    Gargan 10 out of 12
    Cann 9/11
    Attakora 8/16
    Garcia 21/25
    Peterson 5/8
    Nane 14/18
    De Guzman 29/40
    Labrocca 20/27
    Santos 9/11
    Mista 6/7
    De Rosario 6/8
    Gala 4/8
    Barrett 2/3
    Where did you get those numbers from?

  2. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BTW I hate to be bad news, but Seattle is up 1-0 against San Jose and nearly 2-0 with a near own goal. We shit on the Sounders all year long but if they win they overtake us in the playoff race.

  3. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    Passing success rate:

    Gargan 10 out of 12
    Cann 9/11
    Attakora 8/16
    Garcia 21/25
    Peterson 5/8
    Nane 14/18
    De Guzman 29/40
    Labrocca 20/27
    Santos 9/11
    Mista 6/7
    De Rosario 6/8
    Gala 4/8
    Barrett 2/3
    Most of those numbers are actually higher than I thought they would be.

    But the problem is, even when the passes do connect, our guys at so bad at collecting the ball properly it hardly matters.

    I mean seriously -- these are professionals -- how can their first-touches be so consistently bad?

  4. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stryker View Post
    How many years are we on the hook for De Guzman?
    When's Mo leaving?
    2 more I believe

  5. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    Passing success rate:

    Gargan 10 out of 12
    Cann 9/11
    Attakora 8/16
    Garcia 21/25
    Peterson 5/8
    Nane 14/28
    De Guzman 29/40
    Labrocca 20/27
    Santos 9/11
    Mista 6/7
    De Rosario 6/8
    Gala 4/8
    Barrett 2/3
    Conclusion: Look how much our midfielders touched the ball and never gave decent balls to our forwards who are very careful with it.
    These numbers don't lie....I sat down with a friend and he called them all.
    Last edited by Davenport; 07-31-2010 at 09:45 PM. Reason: Wrong numbers for Nane

  6. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    Most of those numbers are actually higher than I thought they would be.

    But the problem is, even when the passes do connect, our guys at so bad at collecting the ball properly it hardly matters.

    I mean seriously -- these are professionals -- how can their first-touches be so consistently bad?
    They're higher than I expected, but most of the passes were safe balls sideways or back.
    Not one penetrating ball, and look how much of the ball the midfielders had !!!!!!!

  7. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    They're higher than I expected, but most of the passes were safe balls sideways or back.
    Not one penetrating ball, and look how much of the ball the midfielders had !!!!!!!
    That's true too -- many times when they did try a quick pass up, somebody just passed it back.

  8. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Auzzy View Post
    Where did you get those numbers from?
    Correction....Nane should be 14/28 and most of his passes were sideways. He's shite.

  9. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Am I the only one that thinks De Guzman looked pretty good tonight (apart from that shot)? Some nifty passes in tight spaces and a great workrate ...

  10. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How was the goal scored?

    Did we create chances?

    Why am I asking all these questions when I should've been home watching this game?

    Why do we suck so much on the road?

  11. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC USA View Post
    BTW I hate to be bad news, but Seattle is up 1-0 against San Jose and nearly 2-0 with a near own goal. We shit on the Sounders all year long but if they win they overtake us in the playoff race.
    We're done. We still have more away games than home left.

  12. #42
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i don't think a single game has ever got me so frustrated and mad

    they were worthless

    pack this team up, move it to st. louis, who gives a shit, play in front of soccer moms who chant ole ole ole ole for 90 minutes you sad cunts

  13. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This team could drive you to drink!

  14. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    They're higher than I expected, but most of the passes were safe balls sideways or back.
    Not one penetrating ball, and look how much of the ball the midfielders had !!!!!!!
    De Guzman attempted quite a few ...

  15. #45
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC USA View Post
    How was the goal scored?

    Did we create chances?

    Why am I asking all these questions when I should've been home watching this game?

    Why do we suck so much on the road?
    Brain fart by Cann and poor positioning by Frei!

  16. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennon View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks De Guzman looked pretty good tonight (apart from that shot)? Some nifty passes in tight spaces and a great workrate ...
    Yes, he had the ball lots, but at the stupid money he's earning don't you expect him to knock a killer ball in now and then ???

  17. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,882
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Somewhere in Canada someone watched their first TFC game today.
    They won't watch another.

  18. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    898
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    DISGRACE!
    In the last 2 road games we got beaten by the worst teams in MLS!

    TFC's continuing it's traditional piss poor showings playing as visitors. Anyone is surprised about this? I think the majority is not.

    Some of you say we did not deserved to get beaten.
    I say we fully deserved it, and we'll deserve to get beaten by piss poor teams until we are continuing to be amazingly impotent in getting goals.

    ------------------

    TFC is still thousands of km-s away from being a respectable team even by MLS standards.

  19. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,493
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nah it was a good game tonight.

  20. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennon View Post
    De Guzman attempted quite a few ...
    Yeah -- but then whomever the pass was too usually just passed it back, to 'organize' I suppose. But not enough impetus in the attack.

  21. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennon View Post
    De Guzman attempted quite a few ...
    Fair enough. Attempted, but they never came off because our forwards are not quick enough to lose their markers.
    Watch Montagua on Tuesday...they have quick forwards and will tear our lot apart.
    Mista is not the answer.

  22. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cementhead View Post
    This team could drive you to drink!
    Don't drive home after !!!!!!

  23. #53
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennon View Post
    Am I the only one that thinks De Guzman looked pretty good tonight (apart from that shot)? Some nifty passes in tight spaces and a great workrate ...
    Yes, he looked good. The general reaction around here after a loss is to blame him though, because it's easy to do (since he makes so much money).

  24. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Davenport View Post
    Fair enough. Attempted, but they never came off because our forwards are not quick enough to lose their markers.
    Watch Montagua on Tuesday...they have quick forwards and will tear our lot apart.
    Mista is not the answer.
    Agreed!

  25. #55
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MLSE is laughing all the way to the bank.

  26. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spot-on View Post
    Yes, he looked good. The general reaction around here after a loss is to blame him though, because it's easy to do (since he makes so much money).
    Honestly I don't think any player, regardless of which team, looked good. De Guzman looked better than some but to say that he had a GOOD game is a stretch!

  27. #57
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kaos197O View Post
    Agreed!
    Looking at those passing numbers Santos and Mista don't give it away much, but they rarely do anything dangerous with it.
    They are slow and not goalscoring threats.

  28. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was particularly unimpressed with Labrocca and Peterson tonight. Both of them provided nothing on the wing (or inside), and Peterson even had to be subbed off. Seems like he can't do anything in the heat.

  29. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If it was only 1-0 did we ever come close to equalizing?

    I don't care to watch the highlights reading this thread.

  30. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In the Mixer
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    I was particularly unimpressed with Labrocca and Peterson tonight. Both of them provided nothing on the wing (or inside), and Peterson even had to be subbed off. Seems like he can't do anything in the heat.
    They didn't get past their defenders once.
    Not one good ball from the wings.
    They have NO pace....like most of our slow, old, team.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •