http://mlsnet.com/content/us-ref-analyzes-calls-week
currently up on the MLS website, they're discussing questionable calls this week.
http://mlsnet.com/content/us-ref-analyzes-calls-week
currently up on the MLS website, they're discussing questionable calls this week.
so it looks like it's just a ref reviewing the close calls of the past week, like a commentator? or is this actually some kind of binding arbitration? what a strange thing for them to do on the official site!!!
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
I found this really interesting actually. good read.
Animals Eaten:
pig, cow, lamb, moose, chicken, quail, kudu, ostrich, kangaroo, octopus, alligator, rabbit, shark, springbok, goat, bison, boar, caterpillars, turkey, fish, lobster, crab, oyster, prawn, antelope, camel, eel, squid
This was done last year too -- but through the USSF referee's site.
On the MLS site (when it works), it definitely gets more exposure.
Step in the right direction for MLS. More openness and stop pretending everything is fine in MLS.
I wonder what John Carver would have to say?
re the pickens foul, lack of a card.
“For this particular case, a yellow works here,” Tamberino said. “We didn’t want any more than a yellow card. We didn’t think it was excessive force. It was definitely reckless.”
it's not about excessive force, it's about denying a goalscoring opportunity, cronin would have been through with maybe a defender or two on the line but no goalkeeper to beat. How that wasn't a red card is beyond me, if that had been a defender, leaving cronin through with just the goalie to beat it would have been red, so why not in this case, when the goalscoring chance would have been even easier?