they need to invest in a retractable roof so stadium is open for 365 days of football
How does this contradict the article, which states the losses were higher than projections and that the final gains are expected be less than Cunningham gets paid by over half?
Does your statement mean that the bubble runs at a profit, or that the loss caused by the bubble is compensated by the summer use?
Would losses to the city be reduced by removing the winter bubble?
How much does that thing cost to heat in the midwinter anyway?
I wish i could see their faces when the players said they prefer Saputo...What's the turf done for them lately?