View Poll Results: What formation looks best for TFC?

Voters
40. You may not vote on this poll
  • 4-3-3

    8 20.00%
  • 4-3-1-2

    15 37.50%
  • 4-3-2-1

    8 20.00%
  • Stick to 4-4-2, without natural wingers, cuz it aint no TFC without the chicken wings.

    9 22.50%
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 or 4-3-2-1?

    I like how the team is taking shape to play in a 4-4-2 formation for the 2010 season, but we seem to be just as well suited to play a 4-3-3, or 4-3-1-2, or 4-3-2-1. I'm more inclined to using those 3 formations. So my question is, when FM2011 comes out, what formation looks best for TFC?

    *Mind you when FM2011 comes out, I will dump Garcia and trade for Ugo Ihemelu, first thing.


    4-3-3:

    --------------------------------Frei-----------------------------------
    Attakora----------Gomez--------------------Harden------------Brennan
    ---------------Cronin---------Sanyang--------LeBrocca----------------
    DeGuzman----------------------------------------------------DeRosario
    ------------------------------Barrett----------------------------------

    4-3-1-2:

    --------------------------------Frei-----------------------------------
    Attakora----------Gomez--------------------Harden------------Brennan
    ---------------Cronin---------DeGuzman--------LeBrocca---------------
    -------------------------------Saric-----------------------------------
    -----------------Barrett-------------------DeRosario-------------------

    4-3-2-1:

    --------------------------------Frei-----------------------------------
    Attakora----------Gomez--------------------Harden------------Brennan
    -------------DeGuzman--------Cronin----------LeBrocca----------------
    ----------------------Saric-------------DeRosario----------------------
    ------------------------------Barrett----------------------------------

  2. #2
    RPB Member
    Treasurer

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Full boar
    Posts
    1,472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    E=mc2

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think the single strikers needed considering we only have like 2 of them. Plus, load up the midfield. Thats are only position that we have alot of...

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Out of those three the only one I can only see Preki playing is the 4-3-1-2 ...

    How about this ...

    --------------------------------Frei-----------------------------------
    Cronin/Attakora----------Attakora/Gomez---------Harden--------Brennan
    ----------------------LeBrocca----------De Guzman---------------------
    -------------Peterson---------De Rosario-------------Barrett-----------
    ---------------------------------White---------------------------------

    Pros:
    - De Guzman + Dero playing in their natural positions
    - "Preki friendly" with two 2way mids

    Anybody know if Cronin has ever played at RB?

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lennon View Post
    Anybody know if Cronin has ever played at RB?
    I'm could have sworn he did for a game (or part of a game) last season, but I also could easily be wrong.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    woodbridge
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    gala needs to be in there on the left side and de guzman needs to play in the middle de rosario should be just behind white and just left. gala and de ro could make amazing runs on that left side. now only if we had quality on the right... and, for thsi next game, i would like to see gala/de ro get a few long balls down the left side once in a while... just to keep the opposition on their toes and stretch their defence back = goals. and we haven't seen much this year at all (including preseason) white needs service right up the middle. i don't care if he goes offside once in a while - as long as he threatens.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    woodbridge
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    --------------------------------frei-----------------------------------
    gargan-----------attakora-------------harden-------------brennan
    ----------------------saric----------de guzman---------------------
    labrocca---------------------------------------------------------gala
    ------------------------------------de rosario------------------------
    --------------------------white---------------------------------------

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think to be competitive we're going to have to go 4-4-4 and hope the ref doesn't notice

  9. #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    low earth orbit
    Posts
    5,517
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [NBF] View Post
    I like how the team is taking shape to play in a 4-4-2 formation for the 2010 season, but we seem to be just as well suited to play a 4-3-3, or 4-3-1-2, or 4-3-2-1. I'm more inclined to using those 3 formations. So my question is, when FM2011 comes out, what formation looks best for TFC?
    What's your philosophy ? Are you a defensive, counter-attacking side, or do you employ a pressing game, with all out attack ? I think you need to decide that before picking your formation.
    a ha ha heh he hoo.. ha

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    on the TTC
    Posts
    1,241
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thanks for the lotto picks!

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ------------------------------conway----------------------------------------
    attakora------------------frei--------------------devos-----------------brennan
    cronin-------------lebrocca------------------sanyang
    deguz--------barrett---------dero

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mayne Island, BC
    Posts
    2,265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    None of the above... I'd say 4-2-3-1... If we used a line up with 4 defenders and 3 holding mids I'd sell my seasons.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    t.dot
    Posts
    7,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    does it matter...preki will do whatever the hell he wants

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Out of my brain on the 5:15
    Posts
    8,865
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Pub.
    Posts
    8,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    3-0... Whatever formation allows us to win 3-0...

    Or "36-24-34"...

    Carts...
    "...Money wasn't tight, but it like, it wasn't right..."


  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Parkdale
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Was Preki trying to play a 4-4-2 against Columbus? I only caught the second half and it was hard to tell from the coverage...

    Anyway... if he's determined to play 4-4-2 with that line up then we're going to be getting 4-4-2 all season long.
    Last edited by druid; 04-02-2010 at 02:33 PM.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Oliphant View Post
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42
    4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42-4-8-15-16-23-42

    What happens if you don't enter that sequense of numbers in time? Do you allow the outside world in to your home?

    Is it possible that you're the one keeping the MLSE curse contained within Toronto?

  18. #18
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    low earth orbit
    Posts
    5,517
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by druid View Post
    Was Preki trying to play a 4-4-2 against Columbus? I only caught the second half and it was hard to tell from the coverage...

    Anyway... if he's determined to play 4-4-2 with that line up then we're going to be getting 4-4-2 all season long.
    TBH it looked to me as though he was playing a 3-4-3. As long as he has the right pjayers and they all buy into his scheme it can be deadly... But it takes some adjustment.
    a ha ha heh he hoo.. ha

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,263
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about we not run a poll on something we have absolutely no control over and are grossly misinformed about as is?

    How about this thought...

    No matter what formation we use, if the players can't execute tactical play, set plays, or play smart defensively within that formation, we're fucked. Let's let the guys running the team choose the formation and teach the guys the tactical plays.

    You can arrange people in a formation, but if none of them know what the fuck they're doing, the formation is no better than a 0-0-10

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •