Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default No Champs League next year?

    So with the recent news that the Whitecaps and Impact will not be part of the USL next season where does that leave Canada in terms of a CONCACAF Champions League entrant. Will we still get one with only one team if the 2 others dont play anywhere? Does anyone have any idea on this matter?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,753
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Is this confirmed? I can see it for Vancouver but tht seemsa bit premature for Montreal, the whole counting chickens before they hatch, putting all their eggs in one basket, etc. I mean they're not confirmed into the MLS are they?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://tsn.ca/soccer/story/?id=296379

    Seems confirmed according to the USL

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    West Siiiiide
    Posts
    24,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dumbass move by the "new" USL or whatever they will be called. With the weak US dollar, having both Canadian teams out will take a serious bite out of revenues.

  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kingston (with a touch of anywhere else)
    Posts
    4,342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Give it some time. There's a full discussion going on about it and the possible ramifications here:

    http://www.redpatchboys.ca/forums/sh...ad.php?t=18228

  6. #6
    Mikey
    Guest

    Default

    Hey if we're the only team in it, we could get a draw and maybe go though on tie-breaker? Assuming we don't still have Garcia and lose 1-0 on an own goal......

    Oh crap, I hope I havent jinxed it.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    5,570
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lots can happen between now and next spring, last min agreement with USL, a new league, etc.

    if they do fold, maybe a game vs CSL all-stars, canadian USL all-stars? or maybe a game v the CMNT..oh wait, that would end up being an intra-squad game for the most part...and we'd probably lose haha

  8. #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Windsor, ON
    Posts
    485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe Montreal and Vancouver get to stay in the tournament as independents?

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pickering
    Posts
    109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Us vs. the CSL teams would be epic...

    10:1 we lose to Croatia..

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Toronto should still be crowned champion and there should still be a party. Even if they are Canadian champions by default.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kitchener
    Posts
    551
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wait, why exacly is Vancouver and Montreal not in the USL next season?

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    5,380
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kitchener-TFC View Post
    Wait, why exacly is Vancouver and Montreal not in the USL next season?
    A faction of USL-1 team owners (the "Team Owners Association") put in a losing bid to buy the league because Umbro/Nike didn't want to own USL anymore. The winning bidder comes from outside USL, so people are siding up and apparently Van and Mtl are going with the TOA.

    The TOA has a point in saying that in every other professional league the league is run by the team owners. Having said that, their bid lost. I'm not sure why they think things are different now than when they all bought franchises in the league.

  13. #13
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kingston (with a touch of anywhere else)
    Posts
    4,342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Read this thread:

    http://www.redpatchboys.ca/forums/sh...ad.php?t=18228

    That's where all of the information can be found.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Whoopee forever
    Posts
    7,675
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    there's always the PDL/CSA teams *shrug*

  15. #15
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Windsor, ON
    Posts
    485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't understand why Montreal and Vancouver would be out of the Champions League due to this. I thought this was a by-invitation tournament organized by the CSA (which is why no CSL teams are invited) to have a champion represent them because there is no true national league. I don't recall saying it's a tournament for Canadian MLS/USL teams only, otherwise FC London would have a say in playing (just like the American PDL teams playing in the US Open Cup)

    I don't think inviting CSL teams is an option right now with Toronto and Montreal both having their reserves in the league, possibly creating a conflict of interest. If the CSL champs (Trois-Rivieres) were invited in to represent as champs of the CSL, would the Impact not tell them to lay down for them to get 6 guaranteed points?

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    interresting to see what Vancouver and Montreal are gonna do next season then. Vancouver could wait out a year since they are joining MLS in 2011. Just means they would pretty much have to join the league as a expansion team which im sure Vancouver would rather not do. Its much harder to join hte league as an expansion team. Its more worrysome for Montreal tho, they are not guaranteed to join MLS.
    Last edited by james; 10-29-2009 at 11:43 PM.

  17. #17
    RPB Member XI17 Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oshawa, Ontario
    Posts
    8,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForestGlade View Post
    I don't understand why Montreal and Vancouver would be out of the Champions League due to this. I thought this was a by-invitation tournament organized by the CSA (which is why no CSL teams are invited) to have a champion represent them because there is no true national league. I don't recall saying it's a tournament for Canadian MLS/USL teams only, otherwise FC London would have a say in playing (just like the American PDL teams playing in the US Open Cup)

    I don't think inviting CSL teams is an option right now with Toronto and Montreal both having their reserves in the league, possibly creating a conflict of interest. If the CSL champs (Trois-Rivieres) were invited in to represent as champs of the CSL, would the Impact not tell them to lay down for them to get 6 guaranteed points?
    I think that's exactly right. What league the teams are playing in is irrelevant as far as I know. The competition was agreed upon to consist of Toronto FC, The Montreal Impact, and Vancouver Whitecaps. The Impact could be playing in a semi-pro or amateur league for all it matters with the NCC. For now, at least.
    Did the USA , of all countries, just fix soccer? - C. Ronaldo, May 27th commenting on the FBI-led investigations into fraud and corruption throughout FIFA.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    5,570
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the reason I'm assuming they'd be out is that, as of right now, there's nowhere for them to go. Chances are they won't be in MLS, officially there's no MLS2 and CSL teams don't play in the tourney.

    If they aren't in a league, it doesn't make much business sense (to me at least) to keep the team together just to play in this tourney. Not too mention, I'm sure most players wouldn't wanna have to stick around for only a few games.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by james View Post
    interresting to see what Vancouver and Montreal are gonna do next season then. Vancouver could wait out a year since they are joining MLS in 2011. Just means they would pretty much have to join the league as a expansion team which im sure Vancouver would rather not do. Its much harder to join hte league as an expansion team. Its more worrysome for Montreal tho, they are not guaranteed to join MLS.
    What else is Vancouver but an expansion team for for MLS in 2011.
    Seattle was the same thing, as was Toronto.
    And how is it harder? Do you not recall Chicago Fire in their 1st MLS season?

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I beleive to be in a CONCACAF tourney, they do have to be in a FIFA recognized league like the MLS or the USL. So it probably is very relevant whether or not they remain in the USL. I'm not sure if FIFA would sanction a third breakaway league in North America. Mabe someone else knows if there is a precedent for that.

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of the border. 97 miles from BMO.
    Posts
    1,149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForestGlade View Post
    I don't think inviting CSL teams is an option right now with Toronto and Montreal both having their reserves in the league, possibly creating a conflict of interest. If the CSL champs (Trois-Rivieres) were invited in to represent as champs of the CSL, would the Impact not tell them to lay down for them to get 6 guaranteed points?
    I'm sure there would be some kind of regulations in place for that. This situation happens in other countries. Both Werder Bremen and their reserve team (Werder Bremen II) qualified for the DFB-Cup a couple years ago, but they never played each other. Both teams lost in the 3rd round.

  22. #22
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Windsor, ON
    Posts
    485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaahuuu View Post
    I'm sure there would be some kind of regulations in place for that. This situation happens in other countries. Both Werder Bremen and their reserve team (Werder Bremen II) qualified for the DFB-Cup a couple years ago, but they never played each other. Both teams lost in the 3rd round.
    I don't think any regulations could be enforced at all no matter what. Let's go hypothetical and say Montreal has 8 points and Trois-Rivieres has 7, and they just happen to meet on the final day of the season. What possible regulation could you put in place to say that the Attak can't "do the job"? The Impact are supposed to be better than their reserves

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •