Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,451
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Forget the cap - Domestic player rule needs changing

    We've gone on many a discussion about the salary cap and whether increasing it would lead to improved play within the league. I'd like to draw your attention to something else that could have a major impact on TFC's success in the years ahead, if it isn't already now.

    The MLS is a Development league. As such, it requires that each team carry a roster of 20 players (plus 4 developmental players), only 8 of which can be International slots. Now, these slots can be traded so the number isn't set in stone.

    For US based teams, that means 12 US born players are required on each roster.

    For Toronto FC, that international allotment is increased to 13 players and 5 of those players can be Americans. That means TFC must have 7 Canadians on the roster of 20.

    I don't think there is any question as to the relative health of USA Soccer vs Canadian Soccer and perhaps this quota system is the way to improve our program.

    That said, it puts TFC at a disadvantage relative to other clubs.

    Further, as Vancouver enters the league and faces the same requirements, we will be competing in a very shallow talent pool. Add Montreal to the mix and you are now looking at finding 21 Canadian players willing to play in the MLS and that can contribute to their clubs.

    Might this rule have more of an impact on our future than any discussion of salary cap?

  2. #2
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Frozen Swampland
    Posts
    17,367
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I believe there was talk of changing rules so both Canadian and US players qualify as domestic, but USSF quashed it
    “Years have gone by and I’ve finally learned to accept myself for who I am: a beggar for good football.

    I go about the world, hand outstretched, and in the stadiums I plead: ‘A pretty move, for the love of God.’

    And when good football happens, I give thanks for the miracle and I don’t give a damn which team or country performs it.”

    -Eduardo Galeano

  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kingston (with a touch of anywhere else)
    Posts
    4,342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The MLS was created as a development league for the USSF. As such, anything that disadvantages them, they veto.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think that if the CSA were to have seen TFC as a reason to get things moving in the development of Canadian talent over the last three years, then it wouldn't have been as big an issue.

    However that being said there are currently 25 Canadians playing between the Whitecaps and the Impact. only 14 of them need move into the MLS.

    We know that both teams can compete so I don't see any real issue with the rule at the moment.

    and though I'm not sure about the Impact, I know the Whitecaps already have a developed Academy system so I'm not worried about it at all with the current state of the MLS.

    My only worry is no teams to take the place of whitecaps and the Impact, I'd really love to see 3 new Tier 2 teams come in to help bring in more Canadian talent on top of the academy systems.
    Last edited by Kaz; 09-19-2009 at 03:53 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Disadvantage? More like advantage since TFC got more international roster slots than US teams. Just because Mo is idiot and knows jack about Canadian soccer players doesn't mean there is a major problem. Vancouver and Montreal both had more Canadian players than us and they held their own against us (in fact last year, TFC didn't even win Canadian Championship against two USL canadian clubs who were fielding mostly Canadian players).

    Anyway, MLS needs to be more liberal when comes to academy. These academy players are going to help out Canadian teams to fill out their roster to fill in domestic slots.

  6. #6
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Frozen Swampland
    Posts
    17,367
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hey c'mon now. Mo's got Attakora in TFC books since season 1
    “Years have gone by and I’ve finally learned to accept myself for who I am: a beggar for good football.

    I go about the world, hand outstretched, and in the stadiums I plead: ‘A pretty move, for the love of God.’

    And when good football happens, I give thanks for the miracle and I don’t give a damn which team or country performs it.”

    -Eduardo Galeano

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    in your head
    Posts
    9,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Vancouver and Montreal both had more Canadian players than us and they held their own against us (in fact last year, TFC didn't even win Canadian Championship against two USL canadian clubs who were fielding mostly Canadian players).
    In fact, TFC has the most points in the two years of the Nutrilite...

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rocker View Post
    In fact, TFC has the most points in the two years of the Nutrilite...
    But yet, they didn't win first year tournament while barely winning 2nd year tournament against a team fielding mostly their b team plus couple of academy players.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    in your head
    Posts
    9,850
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    But yet, they didn't win first year tournament while barely winning 2nd year tournament against a team fielding mostly their b team plus couple of academy players.
    And Montreal blew chunks in their second year, WITH ALL THOSE CANADIANS.

    And on June 2 of this year, TFC started MORE CANADIANS than Vancouver did (5-4).

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rocker View Post
    And Montreal blew chunks in their second year, WITH ALL THOSE CANADIANS.
    So what? They played a lot of games and besides, they were some conflict within' team which hurt their chemistry. Also they fired their coach.

    And on June 2 of this year, TFC started MORE CANADIANS than Vancouver did (5-4).
    So what? Good for TFC.

    But then again, TFC invested (continue to do so) into Canadian players after realizing how horrible most of their international signings were.

  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,451
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Disadvantage? More like advantage since TFC got more international roster slots than US teams.
    It's all perspective.

    US Teams are allotted 8 Internationals and 12 Americans

    TFC is allotted 8 Internationals, 5 Americans and 7 Canadians

    The issue is whether, on average, 12 Americans are better than 5 Americans and 7 Canadians given the talent pool from which to draw...

    AND does that opinion change when there are more Canadian teams dipping into the same (limited) talent pool to get their Canadians.

    From a development perspective, it's probably a good thing for Canadian soccer. From a "success in the MLS" standpoint, it might be a disadvantage until the talent pool in Canada increases.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nawth yawk
    Posts
    5,357
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nutralite, best team in Canada debate again?




    VanWC will be fine.

    1) Go look at their residency system. As soon as they join the MLS they will have the top program, no debate.
    2) There are other Canadian players in the MLS who may be made available through trade.
    3) There are other Canadian players who may be available through the expansion draft.
    4) There are unemployed Canadians *cough* Sutton *cough* who can fill in as subs
    5) Just because you need 7 Canadians doesn't mean you need 7 starting Canadians. Don't even need most of them on the bench.
    6) They already have a relationship with FC Energie Cottbus, and have sent 7 players there, 1 sold the rest on loan. Guess who their first team keeper is??. CMNT Lars Hirschfield. Not saying they would get him of couse, but having a relationship and Kerfoot money always helps.
    7) They have a couple of Canadians on their roster already who will be adequate for a MLS start up team.

    And if they are a bit short I am sure they can hit Garber up for a few American slots. If anything, the MLS has shown a willingness to adapt, especially if it falls within the USSF mandate.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Soccer is Canada's number 1 participant sport. The future is bright. Keep it the way it is.

  14. #14
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They can fuss with the numbers of slots but I don't see it as the biggest issue. Eventually football will be Canada's second sport and the kids will want to go pro at home en masse.
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm sure if we're desperate we can sign Pozniak again... or at least Vancouver will

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    817
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wouldn't be suprised if Pozniak signs with Vancouver.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •