Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 49
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default TFC @ Skydome,competition breakdown

    just how exactly does this work.

    we face Puerto Rico islanders in a home and away leg, if we win that, we go into a groupstage. in the group stage who makes it out, first or first and second.

    then after that is it quarter finals?

    and when do you think TFC would play at the skydome, in the group stage, or iffff we advance from there

    thanks

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Whistler
    Posts
    398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    playing in the skydome would suck! If you thought the turf at bmo was bad, the turf at olympic stadium was WAY worse. I care about the play on the pitch, not the fans in the stands.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dunkers View Post
    playing in the skydome would suck! If you thought the turf at bmo was bad, the turf at olympic stadium was WAY worse. I care about the play on the pitch, not the fans in the stands.
    Yeah, but -- and this getting WAY ahead of ourselves -- we have to play a game in February, it has to be at the Dome. You cannot play a soccer game in -20 degree weather, I'm sorry.

    Maybe since they know it will sell out they'd be willing to lay down grass for the match.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hope soo.

    but would this be during the groupstage, or would it be IFF we advance from the groupstage

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick.mastro View Post
    hope soo.

    but would this be during the groupstage, or would it be IFF we advance from the groupstage
    From the group stage ... they probly won't play games at Skydome if it isn't cold

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick.mastro View Post
    hope soo.

    but would this be during the groupstage, or would it be IFF we advance from the groupstage
    It would after the group stage -- if we make it to the quarter-finals.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MLSE would most likely rather play under a bubble than make a deal with Rogers.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    unless MLSE thinks they can sell skydome out during the groupstage, and you know how their all about making more money...

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They should buy a see-through bubble. It'd be like watching a game of fooseball.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll View Post
    They should buy a see-through bubble. It'd be like watching a game of fooseball.
    lmfao

  11. #11
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,247
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A deal between Rogers and MLSE would be fine, they are already partners on the Bills in Toronto series.

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick.mastro View Post
    unless MLSE thinks they can sell skydome out during the groupstage, and you know how their all about making more money...
    When Montreal did this, they sold tickets practically for nothing and tickets at Saputo were worth nothing. I doubt you'd sell out Skydome at the current price table. If they had to lower the prices and give Rogers a cut, they might as well hold it in their own building.

    MLSE will raise ticket prices and play in a bubble before sharing their profits. If they thought they could make money at Skydome, Real Madrid would be playing there.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nestease View Post
    When Montreal did this, they sold tickets practically for nothing and tickets at Saputo were worth nothing. I doubt you'd sell out Skydome at the current price table. If they had to lower the prices and give Rogers a cut, they might as well hold it in their own building.

    MLSE will raise ticket prices and play in a bubble before sharing their profits. If they thought they could make money at Skydome, Real Madrid would be playing there.
    The game physically and logically cannot be held at BMO.

    The Dome is the only option -- so technically they could charge whatever they wanted.

    However, I think they're smart enough not to go overboard on the pricing.

  14. #14
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    parkdale
    Posts
    2,993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    Yeah, but -- and this getting WAY ahead of ourselves -- we have to play a game in February, it has to be at the Dome. You cannot play a soccer game in -20 degree weather, I'm sorry.....
    If we're playing against some central american team, talk about a home field advantage.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darlofletch View Post
    If we're playing against some central american team, talk about a home field advantage.
    There's no home field advantage when your own players get frostbite.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Montgomery Mini Mall
    Posts
    4,248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    The game physically and logically cannot be held at BMO.

    The Dome is the only option -- so technically they could charge whatever they wanted.

    However, I think they're smart enough not to go overboard on the pricing.
    SMH

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    The game physically and logically cannot be held at BMO.
    Nevermind, you're right. I forgot there were no stands under the bubble. Maybe they'll squeeze a field inside the Air Canada Centre

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James17930 View Post
    There's no home field advantage when your own players get frostbite.
    Probly still some advantage playing vs. players that have never seen snow before ...

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ajax
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .....definately not lol
    with all the seats having to be move you could expect a capacity of 10k the most

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ajax
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this is really interesting to how this would be if tfc make it to the quaters, because Montreal was able to play in the olympic stadium because it was owned by the governemt of Quebec, but Rogers Centre is owned by rogers communications, i wonder what kind of price MLSE would have to pay to play in there, and what ticket prices would we be looking at

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jahinho_Guerro View Post
    .....definately not lol
    with all the seats having to be move you could expect a capacity of 10k the most
    They'll charge you $300 a ticket and call it "the price of having a big game in a small venue". Don't worry though, you'll get loyalty pricing.

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Waterloo
    Posts
    102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Continuing on the big IF we make it to the quarters scenario.

    Can you guys see Rogers totally sticking it to MLSE because they know the Skydome is really the only place they could hold the game?

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ajax
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i can totally see that,
    and that being a factor to the supporters

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cannon View Post
    Continuing on the big IF we make it to the quarters scenario.

    Can you guys see Rogers totally sticking it to MLSE because they know the Skydome is really the only place they could hold the game?
    No. Rogers and MLSE have a good working relationship -- they're not enemies. I don't know where this perception comes from.

    Rogers would love to have the game in the Dome. 55,000+ buying tickets, not to mention the concessions. It would be a huge pay-day for them.

    They'd be on it instantly if the opportunity arises.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nestease View Post
    When Montreal did this, they sold tickets practically for nothing and tickets at Saputo were worth nothing. I doubt you'd sell out Skydome at the current price table. If they had to lower the prices and give Rogers a cut, they might as well hold it in their own building.
    tickets were not for nothing. Biggest misconception out there.
    A great amount were for $30 and up.

  26. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Welland/Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,354
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Rogers hasn't had a brush with TFC supporters yet. All MLSE has to do is say "It's them" and the war hounds will be released.

    And if it is at the skydome, we need banners. Lots and lots and lots and lots of banners.

    But James is right. Concessions and what not would be huge.

  27. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    1,375
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd love to see SkyDome turned red, but even if we get past the Islanders, were in the group of death. Saprissa, Columbus, Cruz Azul, yikes! We'd deserve some sort of trophy just for making it out of that group.

  28. #28
    olegunnar
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NF-FC View Post
    I'd love to see SkyDome turned red, but even if we get past the Islanders, were in the group of death. Saprissa, Columbus, Cruz Azul, yikes! We'd deserve some sort of trophy just for making it out of that group.
    Yeah
    I was going to post this in it's own thread.
    This draw makes no sense.

    Islanders did really well in last years tourny
    Saprissa are CR champs
    Crew are MLS champs
    Cruz Azul 2008 Mexican league champs. 3rd in 2009.

    Concacaf must not have any weighted seedings otherwise this never would have happened.

    Even IF we get past the Islanders we'd be the 4th best in our group of 4.

  29. #29
    I_AM_CANADIAN
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boban View Post
    tickets were not for nothing. Biggest misconception out there.
    A great amount were for $30 and up.
    Yep, this is true. the Impact also did a lot of publicity for the game, and if we get there, so should MLSE.

  30. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc"2L" View Post
    Rogers hasn't had a brush with TFC supporters yet. All MLSE has to do is say "It's them" and the war hounds will be released.

    And if it is at the skydome, we need banners. Lots and lots and lots and lots of banners.

    But James is right. Concessions and what not would be huge.
    went to grey cup, and it took a whole quarter to get a beer ... it would be a riot with TFC fans, not to mention the diziness climing six stories to your seats ... it would be the worst game atmosphere ever

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •