Chicago Vs. KC on FSC - Sat April 18th
Hey anyone watching this game. Both of my FSC feeds are grainy and stopping and started making the game pretty annoying
Update
'44 2-0 Chicago - McBride with both goals.
The Fire appear to be owning this game. I just don't see KC having the quality to be able to compete.
Good game so far. Fire dominating, playing really well. Good reffing (I know - weird, but it happens occasionally).
hahaha...the commentator just said..."The fans are going BONKERS" and showed a picture of some fat Yanks sitting in their seats looking clueless.... I am not making fun of Americans, but it was just the complete opposite to what the FSC commentator said.
Detroit (Rock City) are you watching the feed on the net or do you suscribe to FSC?
I get FSC on my satellite system (DirecTV, w/sports package). I also get Setanta during the Prem season ($15/mo.)
Satellite is superior to cable in every way except one and it is a biggie. Local cable has CBC Windsor, satellite, no. So I have to watch CBC games with the rabbit ears and its like watching a game in a snowstorm (the signal doesn't come too far into the US). When the digital switch comes probably won't be able to get it at all.
KC all over them now, it's 2-1 at 80.
Be interesting to see what delusional attendance number MLS posts for this. Place is 2/3rds empty.
KC ties it up. Could see that coming.
MLS's matchtracker says 10,782.Originally Posted by jloome
Chicago would be the best team in the leauge if the matches were 70 min long...Blanco really has lost 2 or 3 steps
That first half from Chicago was spectacular. They really took Arnaud out of the game. As for KC, Hartman had some monster saves, especially the fingertip deflection of Rolfe's shot.
True but he was absolutely essential for Chicago in the first half. If Blanco really leaves next season, Chicago is in a world of trouble.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote