View Poll Results: If seating expansion occurs... will we get a supporter/controlled section?

Voters
371. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes... They will finanlly get it

    82 22.10%
  • No.... They will screw this up royally

    213 57.41%
  • hmmm... not sure? how much money will they make from this?

    76 20.49%
Page 92 of 163 FirstFirst ... 4282888990919293949596102142 ... LastLast
Results 2,731 to 2,760 of 4872
  1. #2731
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    t.dot
    Posts
    7,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BMO Field 2nd on council list today

  2. #2732
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulder View Post
    Do some research. The Sprint Centre has maintained an operating profit & is the 6th busiest in the US and 26th in the world. Not bad for a stadium that doesn't have a tenant.

    If anything, the financial model for the Sprint Centre should be followed and stadiums like that should be build with that model in case a major tenant doesn't come.



    http://www.sprintcenter.com/news/det...arena-for-2012

    http://www.isitpacked.com/2010/11/04...as-in-america/

    http://sprint_center.s3.amazonaws.co...renaVenues.pdf
    This is a very good argument to keep government money out of it. It's a good investment for a private company to make.

  3. #2733
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BMO discussion starting now

  4. #2734
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    796
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BMO Field debate has just begun with Kelly speaking first.

  5. #2735
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    t.dot
    Posts
    7,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #2736
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    114
    Posts
    244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulder View Post
    Do some research. The Sprint Centre has maintained an operating profit & is the 6th busiest in the US and 26th in the world. Not bad for a stadium that doesn't have a tenant.

    If anything, the financial model for the Sprint Centre should be followed and stadiums like that should be build with that model in case a major tenant doesn't come.



    http://www.sprintcenter.com/news/det...arena-for-2012

    http://www.isitpacked.com/2010/11/04...as-in-america/

    http://sprint_center.s3.amazonaws.co...renaVenues.pdf
    Hold on just a minute. While it is true that the Sprint Centre has exceeded most people's expectations of functioning without a major sports tenant, before you go running to (or for) city hall with your great idea -- you might want to do some more research yourself. All the glowing revues you point to above fail to mention the tiny little point that Kansas City is paying $13.8 million dollars a year in debt repayments for the centre. Also, as part of the original proposal, Kansas City's 20,000 seat Kemper Arena (which used to host all these once profitable events) was supposed to be un-effected or eventually "re-purposed". It has not. It now sits largely empty costing Kansas City a further $1 Million dollars a year. Sorry, but that's hardly a financial model I'd want to follow.

  7. #2737
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That is a horrible speaker... he seems totally unable to answer questions with confidence.


    Though I love the questions/statement

    is it not true that by doing this we are not responsible for the 15 million in debt that we would have been responsible and instead readjusting that into an investment that is $5 million less.. but would generate $4 million dollars over time for the city while also paying back the initial $10 million, rather then having to pay $15 in repairs with no benefit and no improvements? So this is a good financial deal that is going to save the city $5 in the short term and seeing $14 million returned to the city, while providing potential increased revenue at the stadium which will also see a greater return in revenue being made by the stadium coming to the city...

    It's really hard to vote no when you put it in that light.
    Last edited by Kaz; 04-03-2014 at 09:45 AM.

  8. #2738
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaz View Post
    That is a horrible speaker... he seems totally unable to answer questions with confidence.


    Though I love the questions/statement

    is it not true that by doing this we are not responsible for the 15 million in debt that we would have been responsible and instead readjusting that into an investment that is $5 million less.. but would generate $4 million dollars over time for the city while also paying back the initial $10 million, rather then having to pay $15 in repairs with no benefit and no improvements? So this is a good financial deal that is going to save the city $5 in the short term and seeing $14 million returned to the city, while providing potential increased revenue at the stadium which will also see a greater return in revenue being made by the stadium coming to the city...

    It's really hard to vote no when you put it in that light.
    This deal is no brainer for the city, but ideology reason, I can see why someone like Ford wouldn't support this investment though.

  9. #2739
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    westdale, hamilton
    Posts
    6,436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    so whats going on now

  10. #2740
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    796
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    This deal is no brainer for the city, but ideology reason, I can see why someone like Ford wouldn't support this investment though.
    And it'll be Mayor Ford to explain to taxpayers that instead of opting for a $10-mil investment with a return, he wanted to pay an approx. $15-mil repair bill with no chance to recoup those funds.

    Yep. No-brainer for council.

  11. #2741
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nascarguy View Post
    so whats going on now
    Cho is rambling about a swiss company does ball barings and small south korean citys and pot holes.

    Vote is coming up.
    Last edited by Kaz; 04-03-2014 at 10:10 AM.

  12. #2742
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    This deal is no brainer for the city, but ideology reason, I can see why someone like Ford wouldn't support this investment though.
    Because he is an idiot.

    spend 10 million... get 4 million plus the 10 million back over time, plus possible increased revenue or spend 15 million with no return.

    Yep Rob Ford not supporting it shows he doesn't read.

  13. #2743
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulder View Post
    Do some research. The Sprint Centre has maintained an operating profit & is the 6th busiest in the US and 26th in the world. Not bad for a stadium that doesn't have a tenant.

    If anything, the financial model for the Sprint Centre should be followed and stadiums like that should be build with that model in case a major tenant doesn't come.



    http://www.sprintcenter.com/news/det...arena-for-2012

    http://www.isitpacked.com/2010/11/04...as-in-america/

    http://sprint_center.s3.amazonaws.co...renaVenues.pdf
    Fair comment. I didn't research this one really, I usually do my homework though. I'm pretty surprised they sell more tickets in a year than the Bell Centre in MTL and others with no anchor tenant. But "profitability" might mean they make a few thousand bucks a year, nothing to show an ROI on the cost of building the place or to cover debt repayments like Commie Red just said.

    Anyway, doesn't seem to be one of AEGs or Liewekie's best moves. But If KC end up getting an expansion NHL franchise in the next few years then he will be seen as being vindicated though. Doesn't sound like there is an owner up for it there though.

  14. #2744
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Seems to have passed 39-3

  15. #2745
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haddy View Post
    And it'll be Mayor Ford to explain to taxpayers that instead of opting for a $10-mil investment with a return, he wanted to pay an approx. $15-mil repair bill with no chance to recoup those funds.

    Yep. No-brainer for council.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaz View Post
    Because he is an idiot.

    spend 10 million... get 4 million plus the 10 million back over time, plus possible increased revenue or spend 15 million with no return.

    Yep Rob Ford not supporting it shows he doesn't read.
    Ford doesn't support it because city doesn't have money to pay for it right now. City will have to take a loan to come up with $10 million.

    This is all according to Ford.

  16. #2746
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaz View Post
    Seems to have passed 39-3
    Fords and Del Grande against. Del Grande is leaving and is taking the opportunity to rehash old battles.

    Council called for the vote, which means nobody wanted to discuss it beyond those against.


    That's it people.

    Don't expect to see a home game in March or April for the next 2 seasons.

  17. #2747
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Fords and Del Grande against. Del Grande is leaving and is taking the opportunity to rehash old battles.

    Council called for the vote, which means nobody wanted to discuss it beyond those against.


    That's it people.

    Don't expect to see a home game in March or April for the next 2 seasons.
    I don't mind that given how weather is becoming unpredictable in March and April.

  18. #2748
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Niagara Falls
    Posts
    2,623
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Ford doesn't support it because city doesn't have money to pay for it right now. City will have to take a loan to come up with $10 million.

    This is all according to Ford.
    Which shows Ford doesn't read.
    Does the city have 15 million for repairs in the same period?

    The city HAS to spend money in the next two years for this. It will go into debt either way. This way the Debt is less, it is not assured (if the reno comes under budget the city is the ones that don't pay (ya right under budger ) ) So Rob Ford Voted to spend 15 million with no return or recoup instead of 10 million with recoup and return.

  19. #2749
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    westdale, hamilton
    Posts
    6,436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    oh boy to work for the city of Toronto you would haft to be drugs and take lots.

  20. #2750
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Fords and Del Grande against. Del Grande is leaving and is taking the opportunity to rehash old battles.

    Council called for the vote, which means nobody wanted to discuss it beyond those against.


    That's it people.

    Don't expect to see a home game in March or April for the next 2 seasons.
    And as usual, MLSE got everything it asked for.

  21. #2751
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Fords and Del Grande against. Del Grande is leaving and is taking the opportunity to rehash old battles.

    Council called for the vote, which means nobody wanted to discuss it beyond those against.


    That's it people.

    Don't expect to see a home game in March or April for the next 2 seasons.
    Why not?
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  22. #2752
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Construction. Home games will be not until May. TL hasn't thought through CCL yet.

  23. #2753
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    westdale, hamilton
    Posts
    6,436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    oh yeah maybe they could get some home game in Hamilton

  24. #2754
    RPB Member
    Vice-President

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    1,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    CCL changes to summer sched in 2015.

    http://forums.redpatchboys.ca/showth...-Championships
    Road Games:
    2013 - Montréal , 2014 - Orlando (Disney Classic), Montréal
    2015 - Columbus, New England, Montréal
    2016 - NYCFC (Leg 2 Conference Semis), Montréal (Leg 1 Conference Final)
    2017 - Ottawa (Leg 1 Canadian Championship Semi), DCU, Red Bulls (Leg 1 Conference Final), Columbus (Leg 2 Conference Final)
    2019 - Montréal, NYCFC (Eastern Conference Semi @ Citi Field), Seattle (MLS Cup Final)

  25. #2755
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Construction. Home games will be not until May. TL hasn't thought through CCL yet.
    Construction through next season till the May after?
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

  26. #2756
    RPB Member
    Vice-President

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    1,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The thought is it starts at the end of this season and lasts until April. Then again the following year, October to April. I can't remember where I read that or I would post a link.
    Road Games:
    2013 - Montréal , 2014 - Orlando (Disney Classic), Montréal
    2015 - Columbus, New England, Montréal
    2016 - NYCFC (Leg 2 Conference Semis), Montréal (Leg 1 Conference Final)
    2017 - Ottawa (Leg 1 Canadian Championship Semi), DCU, Red Bulls (Leg 1 Conference Final), Columbus (Leg 2 Conference Final)
    2019 - Montréal, NYCFC (Eastern Conference Semi @ Citi Field), Seattle (MLS Cup Final)

  27. #2757
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    5,267
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Ford doesn't support it because city doesn't have money to pay for it right now. City will have to take a loan to come up with $10 million.

    This is all according to Ford.
    That's because the Fords have blown through the city's reserve fund to balance the budget and praise his saving the city $1 billion when actually he blew through the $500 plus million reserve.

    And voting against a obvious answer just shows more incompitence.

    This is a good deal for MLSE and the city. A good deal for us is still remained to be seen.

  28. #2758
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fergiejr View Post
    CCL changes to summer sched in 2015.

    http://forums.redpatchboys.ca/showth...-Championships
    CCL is CONCACAF Champions League. Quarters and Semi's and Finals staying in March/April.

  29. #2759
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fort York Redcoat View Post
    Construction through next season till the May after?
    Thankfully no.

    Construction will start right after the EX 2014 with some stuff going on around BMO use but games still on.

    Then full construction until May 2015.

    Plan is by then to have east concourse and East side upper stands up.

    Area must be clear of all construction hoardings etc. for Pan Am games.


    Then, after Pan AM, construction around BMO use continues.

    Construction until May 2016 when finished.

    ******

    The stadium is going to look very different come May of next year.

  30. #2760
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centre of My Bloody Universe.
    Posts
    19,075
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgtheDim View Post
    Thankfully no.

    Construction will start right after the EX 2014 with some stuff going on around BMO use but games still on.

    Then full construction until May 2015.

    Plan is by then to have east concourse and East side upper stands up.

    Area must be clear of all construction hoardings etc. for Pan Am games.


    Then, after Pan AM, construction around BMO use continues.

    Construction until May 2016 when finished.

    ******

    The stadium is going to look very different come May of next year.
    Thanks for spelling that out. Very useful. Appreciate it.

    And no matter how many times I read it I still say in my head "East Side Stand UP"
    FORMER FULL TIME KOOL-AID DRINKER

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •