View Poll Results: If seating expansion occurs... will we get a supporter/controlled section?

Voters
371. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes... They will finanlly get it

    82 22.10%
  • No.... They will screw this up royally

    213 57.41%
  • hmmm... not sure? how much money will they make from this?

    76 20.49%
Page 43 of 163 FirstFirst ... 333940414243444546475393143 ... LastLast
Results 1,261 to 1,290 of 4872
  1. #1261
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The NFL needs to have a 2nd pro football league that is alive and viable. It keeps it from losing the lawsuits that come up every time a new league starts and folds (USFL, XFL, Arena etc). A 2nd pro league in roughly the same market is enough proof for the US Supreme Court that the NFL doesn't crush competition, if you do something innovative enough you can have a pro football league work. That's why the NFL pumped the CFL with cash in the late 90s/2000s when the CFL almost went bankrupt. That's why the NFL won't allow an NFL team to kill a CFL team. An NFL team makes in the 9 figures in profits every year, if they have to carry a 4-5 million dollar a year loss (which would be pretty extreme with the new CFL TV money) as part of their cost of business, it really isn't a huge deal. Especially now that the CFL is actually shown (and somewhat watched) in the States and the league has never been more visible and players coming from the CFL to NFL have never been more visible. I hate the comparison but if the Leafs can support the Marlies, the Toronto NFL's could support the Argos.

    Edit: This whole thread has completely devolved into an NFL speculation thread. No matter what we htink about the NFL it does seem to be fait accompli that the Argos will come to BMO and the renovations will be in that direction. We should maybe start thinking about what can be done to mitigate the damage to BMO as a soccer stadium instead of speculating on whether or not the NFL will be here in 2022. We've gone so far off topic (and by we i mean me mostly. Sorry, sports business fascinates me. Love the stuff)
    Last edited by Waggy; 02-14-2014 at 10:49 AM.

  2. #1262
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waggy View Post
    The NFL needs to have a 2nd pro football league that is alive and viable. It keeps it from losing the lawsuits that come up every time a new league starts and folds (USFL, XFL, Arena etc). A 2nd pro league in roughly the same market is enough proof for the US Supreme Court that the NFL doesn't crush competition, if you do something innovative enough you can have a pro football league work. That's why the NFL pumped the CFL with cash in the late 90s/2000s when the CFL almost went bankrupt. That's why the NFL won't allow an NFL team to kill a CFL team. An NFL team makes in the 9 figures in profits every year, if they have to carry a 4-5 million dollar a year loss (which would be pretty extreme with the new CFL TV money) as part of their cost of business, it really isn't a huge deal. Especially now that the CFL is actually shown (and somewhat watched) in the States and the league has never been more visible and players coming from the CFL to NFL have never been more visible. I hate the comparison but if the Leafs can support the Marlies, the Toronto NFL's could support the Argos.

    Edit: This whole thread has completely devolved into an NFL speculation thread. No matter what we htink about the NFL it does seem to be fait accompli that the Argos will come to BMO and the renovations will be in that direction. We should maybe start thinking about what can be done to mitigate the damage to BMO as a soccer stadium instead of speculating on whether or not the NFL will be here in 2022. We've gone so far off topic (and by we i mean me mostly. Sorry, sports business fascinates me. Love the stuff)
    Problem is MLSE interest in Argos is tied with NFL/Bills. So it's hard not to mention about it at all.

    As for BMO field, TFC obviously still going to be main tenant while Argos will be treated like ugly sister like they're currently with Blue Jays at Rogers Centre. Turf (football lines) and moving seats is remain to be seen, but we NOT going to bring back field turf. TL made that very clear!

  3. #1263
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's true, there's is a great inter-connectedness to everything being discussed regarding the stadium and circumstances affecting it, both locally and beyond.

    The stadium situation in both LA and Buffalo is interesting in that California leads US state debt at over $600 billion. New York runs second at well over $300 billion. Neither state, nor the municipalities around LA or Buffalo are in shape to fund a new stadium project. Which is why Kroenke's land purchase is so alarming to other clubs eyeing LA. Private funding is essential to make it happen and first into LA will be a big winner. Plus Kroenke would be returning the Rams to their previous home, so a lot of nostalgia playing out in his favour.

    I give him the edge. He's got adequate personal wealth and is connected on other levels to create strong cross marketing in the manner that the Yankees and ManCity are working in NY. That seems to be the way forward when building a sports empire in major markets. That, too, is what's afoot here in Toronto and, strictly IMHO, Roger Godell has to be viewing these developments and ensuring his league isn't being left in the slipstream.

    As for Buffalo, lots of noise beginning to rise about a new stadium deal there. But is it really anything more than governor Mario Cuomo looking to protect votes in the area? Buffalo's economic stats are woeful. The city has lost more than half it's population since the mid-'50s and almost half - 44% - of it's children live in definable poverty, according to the 2014 NY state economic profile of the city. It was essentially in receivership for almost the past decade, only having it's financial shackles taken off the past two years. It is operating under very strict budgetary guidelines.

    It is most definitely not in any kind of shape to finance a new stadium. If you're a private investor, you can't be happy to see that land values are far below the median for New York state, and performing in value far below the recovering status of property elsewhere in America. The median household income is just over $30,000 and it is a region having a very difficult time attracting new industry to the area. Strongest job growth there nowadays is occurring in the health care and educational sectors and not the sort of industries you'd expect to be counting on to boost sales of suites or club seats.

    The Bills rely heavily on Canadian customers, but with the border becoming a tighter and tighter place to cross, it doesn't encourage growth in Canadian fan support.

    Jackonsville committed to becoming London, England's de facto home team for upcoming seasons in the Wembley-staged games. Their owner owns Fulham of the Premier League(for now!) and, by all accounts leaking out from North London, Tottenham Hotspur are in the midst of re-designing their impending stadium project to accommodate NFL football, including a retractable pitch. Wembley can't house the NFL for a full season, so this is the next-best solution.

    Here's the sensible scenario: St. Louis moves to LA. San Diego stays put as the NFL loves to cater to the military and SD is Navy Central. Oakland stays put for now, but a lurking contender to move to LA down the road. Jacksonville moves to London. Buffalo moves to Toronto.

    Here's how everybody wins, even Bills fans in Lackawanna, Tonawanda and Salamanca. New stadium goes up for the NFL which also serves as an annual home for Leafs outdoor games. Money maker from Day One. It also serves as a main venue for Canada's 2026 World Cup bid. Government sees that as potentially good legacy usage and agrees to partially fund it.

    NFL loves it because it gets a sexy new home in a sexy city where every other major league sport is already thriving. And it gets to see the CFL kept alive in its biggest market. MLSE builds a gridiron football training centre where both the NFL and CFL players train out of. CFL guys benefit in shared set up with premium facilities that allows for a certain amount of specialized joint coaching. CFL skills go up and their fans don't have to suffer through the usual early-mid season CFL frustration of watching players miss blocking assignments, run bad pass routes, botch simple handoffs and so on. Product quality goes up and fan support doesn't decline. Remember, even modest financial losses with the Argos are acceptable and they have lost millions each year for most of the past two decades. And if the Argos play well and regularly contend, the rest of Canada will hate them even more and they'll become a bigger draw on the road. Win.

    TFC wins because it gets a nice upgrade to its current stadium set up and, along with our national team, will have a major league-sized stadium to draw upon should a massive game demand higher seating capacity.

    MLSE's owners win because they will have better sport products to show on their networks and, with a greater prospect of being competitive or even winning titles, higher audiences on a more consistent basis.

    Buffalo wins because it gets to re-direct money foolishly spent on a futile stadium project towards better incentives to create better paying, long term jobs by attracting new business to locate in the area, which supports initiatives to create better housing and urban infrastructure or for better education facilities for it's struggling inner-city population. I hope the Bills retain some of their current American fan base because they're great people to talk the game with, but I doubt we'll see that many of their fans remain attached to the team long-term because, like so many Americans - and I don't mean this to be insulting - in everyday life, they stand with their backs to the border and gaze inward.
    Last edited by greatwhitenorf; 02-14-2014 at 04:38 PM.

  4. #1264
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    But Bills aren't selling out games despite having cheapest ticket prices in the league and their market isn't strong enough to keep supporting an NFL team especially since in the long term they need a new stadium which makes it harder and more costly to stay in Buffalo. We already know that Wilson family openly said they have no intention owning Bills once Ralph passes away. Unless there's a legitimate group with tons of money and can build a new stadium for Bills in Buffalo, I can't see Bills staying in Western New York once they're sold by family.

    Owning Bills and keeping them in Buffalo isn't logical thing to do if you're in it to make money especially if you can make more money by moving up north that is only couple of hour drive away from current place. Since Toronto is already consider Bills territory, moving there shouldn't be viewed negatively from NFL POV.

    Toronto is way bigger market that can bring more cash to table than Buffalo which can help increase league value by having a stronger (at least number and wealth wise) market in the league than Buffalo.
    HOW?!!

    You do realize that the vast bulk of the NFL's revenue streams come from U.S. network television deals. FOX, CBS, NBC, Disney/ESPN all pay billions of dollars annually for the right to televise NFL games on their channels. There are NO regional television deals between teams, like there are in other sports leagues.

    For Toronto to even comes close to fufilling its wet dream of landing an NFL team, some Canadian national network is going to have to pay through its nose to cover Toronto's side of any TV deal. And keep in mind, the money that's needed will have to reach the NHL in Canada deals. All for one team in the most polarizing sports league in Canada (the NFL) located in the most polarizing city in Canada (Toronto).

    Not only that, 1) the league forbids anyone with any media connection to own an NFL team - see Michael Eisner and Disney, Charles Dolan and Cablevision - which would dismiss MLSE co-owners Bell and Rogers. And 2) there is no guarantee, at all, that the U.S. networks would go along with this plan as they don't like the idea of having to broadcast a team in a foreign city. Look at the stink CBS made when the Blue Jays were competing in the World Series in the early 90s. They said they wouldn't have lost money if there were two American based teams competing in '92 and '93.

    As far as these U.S. networks are concerned, a depressed Buffalo market is more valuable to them than a wealthy Toronto one.
    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  5. #1265
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redcoe15 View Post
    HOW?!!

    You do realize that the vast bulk of the NFL's revenue streams come from U.S. network television deals. FOX, CBS, NBC, Disney/ESPN all pay billions of dollars annually for the right to televise NFL games on their channels. There are NO regional television deals between teams, like there are in other sports leagues.

    For Toronto to even comes close to fufilling its wet dream of landing an NFL team, some Canadian national network is going to have to pay through its nose to cover Toronto's side of any TV deal. And keep in mind, the money that's needed will have to reach the NHL in Canada deals. All for one team in the most polarizing sports league in Canada (the NFL) located in the most polarizing city in Canada (Toronto).

    Not only that, 1) the league forbids anyone with any media connection to own an NFL team - see Michael Eisner and Disney, Charles Dolan and Cablevision - which would dismiss MLSE co-owners Bell and Rogers. And 2) there is no guarantee, at all, that the U.S. networks would go along with this plan as they don't like the idea of having to broadcast a team in a foreign city. Look at the stink CBS made when the Blue Jays were competing in the World Series in the early 90s. They said they wouldn't have lost money if there were two American based teams competing in '92 and '93.

    As far as these U.S. networks are concerned, a depressed Buffalo market is more valuable to them than a wealthy Toronto one.
    1. US TV money is huge, but they're not going to blackmail NFL if they want expand outside of US to grow the league while getting rid of deadweight. Also, US TV networks invest in millions of dollars into other professional leagues in North America that have Canadian teams already. So this issue isn't that big of a deal as you make it out to be. Buffalo isn't exactly "sexy" market that brings a lot of viewers to these networks. So money "lost" isn't going to be huge as you make it out to be.

    BTW: did US TV networks made an issue when Bills were playing at Rogers Centre in the past?

    2. MLSE can't own the team, but they can "own" and operate a football stadium which an Toronto NFL team needs. There are individuals (I posted an article about it) that will buy Bills and move them to Toronto with help of MLSE.

    Would NFL rather have a healthy league with a Toronto team or weaker NFL with depressed market like Buffalo? End of the day, NFL will look after themselves first not let US networks (who need them as much NFL needs them) dictate their business.

    Toronto NFL team brings more Canadian TV money and corporate sponsors while helping NFL grow their brand outside of US.
    Last edited by TFC07; 02-14-2014 at 06:41 PM.

  6. #1266
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    US TV networks invest in millions of dollars into other professional leagues in North America that have Canadian teams already. So this issue isn't that big of a deal as you make it out to be. Buffalo isn't exactly "sexy" market that brings a lot of viewers to these networks. So money "lost" isn't going to be huge as you make it out to be.
    But they don't have to broadcast games with any Canadian based teams if they don't want to, and are not forced to - ie, the playoffs. very rarely have you seen a Canadian based team on any of the MLB, NBA, and even NHL broadcasts on U.S. network television during their regular seasons. Not so with the NFL.

    BTW: did US TV networks made an issue when Bills were playing at Rogers Centre in the past?
    The Bills aren't Toronto's team. They're Buffalo's. Therefore, it doesn't matter to them. If someone tries and move the Bills to Toronto, then it matters to them.

    MLSE can't own the team, but they can "own" and operate a football stadium which an Toronto NFL team needs. There are individuals (I posted an article about it) that will buy Bills and move them to Toronto with help of MLSE.
    The NFL won't be taken in by that shell game. Whoever controlls the team will have to control the stadium themselves, and not have a second party involved.

    US TV money is huge, but they're not going to blackmail NFL if they want expand outside of US to grow the league while getting rid of deadweight.
    Don't ever underestimate the power and influence these networks have over the NFL. In 2001, the league postponed week two of their regular season right after the attacks on 9/11. Shortly afterwards, a decision had to be made on what to do about the remainder of the season. Only two suggesstions were brought up: 1) cancel the week two schedule and play a 15 game season, and 2) do away with the opening round of the playoffs and have the top four teams in each conference compete. Reschedueling the week two games were completely out of the question. The next thing you knew, the NFL paid a boatload of money with a car dealers association to walk away from their convention schedueled at the New Orleans Superdome so that they could move Super Bowl XXXVI a week later in order to reschedule their week two games to the end of the season. Why ? Because the U.S. networks lost precious ad revenues from the postponed games and wern't about to lose anymore, so they twisted the NFL's arm around to make sure they didn't lose their games outright or any playoff games.

    If the networks want something from the league, they'll get it eventually. They added two extra teams to the playoffs in order to get ABC to sign onto a deal in 1990.

    Would NFL rather have a healthy league with a Toronto team or weaker NFL with depressed market like Buffalo? End of the day, NFL will look after themselves first not let US networks (who need them as much NFL needs them) dictate their business.
    The NFL will remain a very healthy league even with a market like Buffalo. And, if not, there are other U.S. markets like Los Angeles, San Antonio, Columbus the Bills can end up in that the networks will approve. A Toronto market will only cost them money.
    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  7. #1267
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay, I am not going to get into a debate since points you have made already been address on here, but if NFL is thinking of having a team in LONDON UK, then what makes you think they wouldn't be okay with Bills moving to Toronto? US TV networks aren't going to stop NFL growing if they NFL wants to grow.

    Also, L.A. is only American market NFL have openly express interest in. San Antonio and Columbus have no chance getting into NFL. There's no potential investors and stadium or future stadiums being built that fits NFL criteria in those cities. Plus, those cities are pretty close to cities with established NFL teams already.

    NFL is trying to grow outside their borders these days since they're almost maxed in USA market. NFL has been pretty open about this for a while now.

  8. #1268
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Re: Redcoe's argument about other US markets for the Bills:

    LA is definitely in play, but shifting a team from the east would require further divisional re-alignment. St. Louis or Oakland are the likeliest choices to move.

    San Antone. Texas already has two teams and adding a third, much smaller marketplace will not go over well with the neighbours. Plus, SA is hardly the place to get pulsing races elsewhere Stateside. The Spurs '07 NBA final series was the worst watched finals in league history.

    Columbus. Cincy to the south, The Factory of Sadness to the north. Like Texas, just jamming too many teams into too small an area. Someone has to suffer, especially when that third team has to battle with Ohio State for fans, sponsors, media coverage. It has about 1/8 the sex appeal of SA.

    As for ownership credentials, if someone like say, Edward Rogers, wanted to step aside from his daily grind at the media empire his dad built and live on his laurels and investment portfolio, he would easily qualify for ownership. If MLSE build them a stadium and give the NFL club scheduling priority, then job done.

    Put a team in Canada and you automatically engage a growing, diverse, prosperous national marketplace in Canada. It joins London in easily fulfilling the NFL's approach to growing beyond US borders.

    As for TV money, sure it's a great thing for now. Sometime down the road, all these leagues are seriously going to be looking at self-producing their own shows and web-casting them. It's going to alter the current dynamic. Better to have big markets to cater to than small, struggling ones.
    Last edited by greatwhitenorf; 02-14-2014 at 08:28 PM.

  9. #1269
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Okay, I am not going to get into a debate since points you have made already been address on here, but if NFL is thinking of having a team in LONDON UK, then what makes you think they wouldn't be okay with Bills moving to Toronto? US TV networks aren't going to stop NFL growing if they NFL wants to grow.

    Also, L.A. is only American market NFL have openly express interest in. San Antonio and Columbus have no chance getting into NFL. There's no potential investors and stadium or future stadiums being built that fits NFL criteria in those cities. Plus, those cities are pretty close to cities with established NFL teams already.

    NFL is trying to grow outside their borders these days since they're almost maxed in USA market. NFL has been pretty open about this for a while now.
    Yes, you're right, but since NFL Europe folded they've been very cautious.

    And the one thing that makes the NFL different from all other North American leagues is the no-corporate ownership rule. So while the NHL and NBA have been very concerned over the years with making sure they are in as many media markets as possible, the NFL doesn't think that way - it's TV coverage is already strong in every market, even in places that don't have a team like LA and Toronto.

    But the NFL ownership ranks are a very private club. Of course, if someone accepted into that club wanted to put a team in London or Toronto the league would approve it. The location isn't nearly as big a factor as who the owner is.

  10. #1270
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyone who thinks any US tv network is worried in any way shape or form about the Buffalo market is insane. If the Bills moved to Toronto, how many viewers/how much ad money would they lose? Honestly. To the TV networks whether the team is in Buffalo or Toronto makes no difference- we get every channel that the NFL is broadcast on, we get the games currently, we currently have our own advertisers who pay them to advertise during the games, and Buffalo has....



    How much is Cellino paying for ad time? You really think Molson/Tim Hortons/Bell/Rogers wouldn't make up the difference times 50?

  11. #1271
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    5,267
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Alight guys keep the NFL talk to what the potential of a stadium for TFC and the impact to it.

    Not talking about the pros and cons or reality of the NFL coming to Toronto. There's a all sport subsection for that.

    Back on topic please.

  12. #1272
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fort Kickass!
    Posts
    5,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Okay, I am not going to get into a debate since points you have made already been address on here, but if NFL is thinking of having a team in LONDON UK, then what makes you think they wouldn't be okay with Bills moving to Toronto? US TV networks aren't going to stop NFL growing if they NFL wants to grow.
    I have the same doubts about the NFL placing a team in London England as I do about Toronto. If not, moreso. From what I've read, there doesn't seem to be a huge demand for a team over there, despite selling out at Wembley every year. They certainly can get their local fans of the teams playing that game to fly over and watch them there. I remember one of our guys, GlenM, attempted to fly to London last year to watch his Steelers play the Vikings at Wembley.

    And they'll have to face the same dilema over there in having to come up with the same amount of television revenues in the U.K. to justify a London NFL team. Which will be more difficult as the vast bulk of its TV sports money is tied up in soccer.

    Roger Godell can talk all he wants about expanding the NFL's footprint outside the United States. But that's all it is. Talk. And unless he has answers as to how to how to add to the league's revenue stream from outside without upsetting the unique revenue stream that's made the NFL into the league that it is, then it's nothing at all but talk from him.

    L.A. is only American market NFL have openly express interest in. San Antonio and Columbus have no chance getting into NFL. There's no potential investors and stadium or future stadiums being built that fits NFL criteria in those cities. Plus, those cities are pretty close to cities with established NFL teams already.

    NFL is trying to grow outside their borders these days since they're almost maxed in USA market. NFL has been pretty open about this for a while now.
    The NFL can always count on some gulliable politician or government from the municipal and/or state level in the States to step forward and shower any owner looking for greener pastures with promises of a new taxpayer funded stadium with a sweetheart lease and sold out luxury suites to move their team there. That's how cities like Indianapolis and Nashville got into the NFL. Otherwise, would they even be considered prime markets for the league?
    TORONTO FC, 2017 MLS CHAMPIONS!!! (Still the greatest in league history!)

  13. #1273
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No, just no. The only people in charge of seating should be the team. The limit should be set at general seating. (with a supporter prefrence) At the same time all supporter sections should be moved to that one end. Stopping short of some other organization (RPB, NEE, USEC) controlling actual sections of the stadium.

    #1 Supporters should be united
    #2 General Admission for the whole south stand.
    #3 Some creative way to deal with scalpers <-------- I hate them. (That does not involve SG control of seats.)
    I'm not a member of RPB, I know every chant. Follow every game. I stand when at Games and hate the limp act as much as anyone.

  14. #1274
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redcoe15 View Post
    I have the same doubts about the NFL placing a team in London England as I do about Toronto. If not, moreso. From what I've read, there doesn't seem to be a huge demand for a team over there, despite selling out at Wembley every year. They certainly can get their local fans of the teams playing that game to fly over and watch them there. I remember one of our guys, GlenM, attempted to fly to London last year to watch his Steelers play the Vikings at Wembley.

    And they'll have to face the same dilema over there in having to come up with the same amount of television revenues in the U.K. to justify a London NFL team. Which will be more difficult as the vast bulk of its TV sports money is tied up in soccer.

    Roger Godell can talk all he wants about expanding the NFL's footprint outside the United States. But that's all it is. Talk. And unless he has answers as to how to how to add to the league's revenue stream from outside without upsetting the unique revenue stream that's made the NFL into the league that it is, then it's nothing at all but talk from him.
    Well you have doubts, but NFL sure has no problems going out their way and saying they support London NFL team in public AND even support London getting a team before L.A.

    Here's an article regrading London NFL team and upside having a team there finanically: http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/n...ly-jags-112113


    Now back to thread topic: when can we realistically expect construction to start to increase seating capacity for Pan-am games?

  15. #1275
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tahrawnah
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redcoe15 View Post
    I have the same doubts about the NFL placing a team in London England as I do about Toronto. If not, moreso. From what I've read, there doesn't seem to be a huge demand for a team over there, despite selling out at Wembley every year. They certainly can get their local fans of the teams playing that game to fly over and watch them there. I remember one of our guys, GlenM, attempted to fly to London last year to watch his Steelers play the Vikings at Wembley.

    And they'll have to face the same dilema over there in having to come up with the same amount of television revenues in the U.K. to justify a London NFL team. Which will be more difficult as the vast bulk of its TV sports money is tied up in soccer.

    Roger Godell can talk all he wants about expanding the NFL's footprint outside the United States. But that's all it is. Talk. And unless he has answers as to how to how to add to the league's revenue stream from outside without upsetting the unique revenue stream that's made the NFL into the league that it is, then it's nothing at all but talk from him.


    The NFL can always count on some gulliable politician or government from the municipal and/or state level in the States to step forward and shower any owner looking for greener pastures with promises of a new taxpayer funded stadium with a sweetheart lease and sold out luxury suites to move their team there. That's how cities like Indianapolis and Nashville got into the NFL. Otherwise, would they even be considered prime markets for the league?
    If I was this ignorant of a subject, I'd be inclined not to comment, let alone dive in with your exaggerated expertise. You need to do some proper research because NFL preparation for a full time franchise in London is well under way.

    And just to steer this topic back onto how it affects TFC, there have been more than enough strategic information leaks to selected media members from MLSE and the Argos to clearly indicate that a future NFL team in Toronto is well in the works. As I've mentioned above, it will end up giving soccer two great local facilities to operate from.
    Last edited by greatwhitenorf; 02-14-2014 at 10:50 PM.

  16. #1276
    RPB Member
    Moderator

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sec-115
    Posts
    9,922
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Well you have doubts, but NFL sure has no problems going out their way and saying they support London NFL team in public AND even support London getting a team before L.A.

    Here's an article regrading London NFL team and upside having a team there finanically: http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/n...ly-jags-112113


    Now back to thread topic: when can we realistically expect construction to start to increase seating capacity for Pan-am games?
    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorf View Post
    If I was this ignorant of a subject, I'd be inclined not to comment, let alone dive in with your exaggerated expertise. You need to do some proper research because NFL preparation for a full time franchise in London is well under way.

    And just to steer this topic back onto how it affects TFC, there have been more than enough strategic information leaks to selected media members from MLSE and the Argos to clearly indicate that a future NFL team in Toronto is well in the works. As I've mentioned above, it will end up giving soccer two great local facilities to operate from.
    GUYS STAY ON TOPIC, Bmo Field Expansion



    Great love does not exist without joy and without great suffering ,that's why One club is worth only as much as its fans !


  17. #1277
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorf View Post
    It's true, there's is a great inter-connectedness to everything being discussed regarding the stadium and circumstances affecting it, both locally and beyond.

    The stadium situation in both LA and Buffalo is interesting in that California leads US state debt at over $600 billion. New York runs second at well over $300 billion. Neither state, nor the municipalities around LA or Buffalo are in shape to fund a new stadium project. Which is why Kroenke's land purchase is so alarming to other clubs eyeing LA. Private funding is essential to make it happen and first into LA will be a big winner. Plus Kroenke would be returning the Rams to their previous home, so a lot of nostalgia playing out in his favour.

    I give him the edge. He's got adequate personal wealth and is connected on other levels to create strong cross marketing in the manner that the Yankees and ManCity are working in NY. That seems to be the way forward when building a sports empire in major markets. That, too, is what's afoot here in Toronto and, strictly IMHO, Roger Godell has to be viewing these developments and ensuring his league isn't being left in the slipstream.

    As for Buffalo, lots of noise beginning to rise about a new stadium deal there. But is it really anything more than governor Mario Cuomo looking to protect votes in the area? Buffalo's economic stats are woeful. The city has lost more than half it's population since the mid-'50s and almost half - 44% - of it's children live in definable poverty, according to the 2014 NY state economic profile of the city. It was essentially in receivership for almost the past decade, only having it's financial shackles taken off the past two years. It is operating under very strict budgetary guidelines.

    It is most definitely not in any kind of shape to finance a new stadium. If you're a private investor, you can't be happy to see that land values are far below the median for New York state, and performing in value far below the recovering status of property elsewhere in America. The median household income is just over $30,000 and it is a region having a very difficult time attracting new industry to the area. Strongest job growth there nowadays is occurring in the health care and educational sectors and not the sort of industries you'd expect to be counting on to boost sales of suites or club seats.

    The Bills rely heavily on Canadian customers, but with the border becoming a tighter and tighter place to cross, it doesn't encourage growth in Canadian fan support.

    Jackonsville committed to becoming London, England's de facto home team for upcoming seasons in the Wembley-staged games. Their owner owns Fulham of the Premier League(for now!) and, by all accounts leaking out from North London, Tottenham Hotspur are in the midst of re-designing their impending stadium project to accommodate NFL football, including a retractable pitch. Wembley can't house the NFL for a full season, so this is the next-best solution.

    Here's the sensible scenario: St. Louis moves to LA. San Diego stays put as the NFL loves to cater to the military and SD is Navy Central. Oakland stays put for now, but a lurking contender to move to LA down the road. Jacksonville moves to London. Buffalo moves to Toronto.

    Here's how everybody wins, even Bills fans in Lackawanna, Tonawanda and Salamanca. New stadium goes up for the NFL which also serves as an annual home for Leafs outdoor games. Money maker from Day One. It also serves as a main venue for Canada's 2026 World Cup bid. Government sees that as potentially good legacy usage and agrees to partially fund it.

    NFL loves it because it gets a sexy new home in a sexy city where every other major league sport is already thriving. And it gets to see the CFL kept alive in its biggest market. MLSE builds a gridiron football training centre where both the NFL and CFL players train out of. CFL guys benefit in shared set up with premium facilities that allows for a certain amount of specialized joint coaching. CFL skills go up and their fans don't have to suffer through the usual early-mid season CFL frustration of watching players miss blocking assignments, run bad pass routes, botch simple handoffs and so on. Product quality goes up and fan support doesn't decline. Remember, even modest financial losses with the Argos are acceptable and they have lost millions each year for most of the past two decades. And if the Argos play well and regularly contend, the rest of Canada will hate them even more and they'll become a bigger draw on the road. Win.

    TFC wins because it gets a nice upgrade to its current stadium set up and, along with our national team, will have a major league-sized stadium to draw upon should a massive game demand higher seating capacity.

    MLSE's owners win because they will have better sport products to show on their networks and, with a greater prospect of being competitive or even winning titles, higher audiences on a more consistent basis.

    Buffalo wins because it gets to re-direct money foolishly spent on a futile stadium project towards better incentives to create better paying, long term jobs by attracting new business to locate in the area, which supports initiatives to create better housing and urban infrastructure or for better education facilities for it's struggling inner-city population. I hope the Bills retain some of their current American fan base because they're great people to talk the game with, but I doubt we'll see that many of their fans remain attached to the team long-term because, like so many Americans - and I don't mean this to be insulting - in everyday life, they stand with their backs to the border and gaze inward.
    I will finish reading your dissertation by mid next week and will formulate a response

  18. #1278
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Row 34
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Since we are off topic, and I dont know where else to put this, Many of the stadiums in Germany sell beer in reuseable plastic mugs that you pay a small deposit for. They are environmentally sustainable and practical in that the mug handle hangs nicely off your back pocket while you are taking a wiz... Its funny to see 50 guys at the urinals at half time with full beers hanging from their back pockets. This is a must in our "expansion" plan from my side. Take the high road on sustainability and ease of access to beer TFC! Cmon!

  19. #1279
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    796
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Been months of MLSE talking and nothing from the city....until now. In case you missed it (like me), the Exhibition Place board of governors met on February 14 and approved the 2014-2016 strategic plan which briefly updates the option to expand BMO Field - hopefully in time for the Pan Am Games.

    Actively support the expansion and enhancement of entertainment facilities


    • Continue to analyze and explore expansion opportunities for BMO Field including improvements related to Festival Plaza
      • Work with City Negotiating Team (City Manager, Finance & Planning)
      • Work with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment on construction
      • Finalize amendments to Management and Licence Agreement and develop Operating Protocols

    • Explore the possibility of hosting Toronto Argonauts games at BMO Field
      • Work with City Negotiating Team (City Manager, Finance & Planning)
      • Finalize amendments to Management and Licence Agreement and develop Operating Protocols

    • Explore opportunities for the private sector to locate a multi-use sports / entertainment / education / community facility on the site
      • Develop implementation plan for development parcel in Parking Lot 6
      • Complete public call process
      • Ensure any proposal requires Heritage Impact Statement
      • Ensure any proposal meets the requirements of Toronto Green Standard
      • Undertake stakeholder community consultation
      • Execute long-term lease
      • Work with successful proponent and City Planning on design, site plan, heritage, transportation issues, through the site plan process
      • Update 2010 Development Plan for the site


    PDF Strategic Plan: http://www.explace.on.ca/database/rt...rat%20Plan.pdf

    --------------------------------------------------

    Page 2 of this PDF provides brief pitch condition report for 2012 and 2013http://www.explace.on.ca/database/rte/files/Item%2014-BMO%20Rates.pdf

    --------------------------------------------------

    BMO Field Expansion report

    http://www.explace.on.ca/database/rt...0Expansion.pdf


    ** This is a letter from Mark Grimes suggesting that approval process begin in earnest ASAP with suggested date to consult with public.

    As reported in the media, MLSE has been very active in recruiting high performance players for the Toronto FC team and it is now very interested in pursuing the expansion of BMO Field as contemplated in the existing Management Agreement and bringing the Toronto Argonauts CFL team to the stadium. MLSE has been in discussions with the City Manager who has put together a staff team made up of City and Board representatives to work with MLSE on the details of any amendments to the Management Agreement.

    Comments:

    While the above-noted discussions have just started, there is some urgency to finalize them and seek approval from the Board and City Council so that the expansion of seats in BMO Field can be completed in advance of the PanAm Games.

    For the information of the Board, it is my understanding that any expansion of seating at BMO Field will be required to comply with the City’s full Site Plan Approval process following any approval by the Board and City amendments to the Management Agreement.

    Given the possible timing issues, Councillor Layton and I have discussed holding a meeting of the Exhibition Place Community Liaison Committee in order to get input from the public and hear the concerns of the public. Councillor Layton, Chair of the Community Liaison Committee is proposing a meeting on March 5, 2014 at 7:00 pm at Exhibition Place. Any issues raised by the community can then be reported to the meetings of both the Board and City Council on this matter and fed into the design and planning approval process undertaken by MLSE and City Planning.

  20. #1280
    RPB Member
    Past-President

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    112 - RPB
    Posts
    12,909
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just looking at numbers. Yesterday Rogers dropped 5.3 billion on a chuck of wireless frequency. Ya, them and Bell own us. Couple that with the NHL deal and I don't think some of this stuff occupies them too much.
    Road Trips: July 7 2007 Chicago, July 22nd 2007 Columbus, August 11 2007 NY, October 13 2007 LA, March 29 2008 Columbus, May 24th 2008 DC, May 26 2008 Montreal, June 28th 2008 NE, March 7-11-14 2009 Charleston, March 28 2009 Columbus, April 10 2010 New England, May 12 2010 Montreal, April 7 2012 Montreal, March 16 2013 Montreal , June 3 2014 Montreal, March 14 2015 Columbus

    Twitter: @RPBPhil

  21. #1281
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    how could they exactly create a controlled supporter section in order to enhance the in game atmosphere?

    How is the supporter sections organized right now, anyone is allowed to apply for a supporter section season ticket, even they are not chanting and just simply watching the game

  22. #1282
    RPB Member
    Past-President

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    112 - RPB
    Posts
    12,909
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick.mastro View Post
    how could they exactly create a controlled supporter section in order to enhance the in game atmosphere?

    How is the supporter sections organized right now, anyone is allowed to apply for a supporter section season ticket, even they are not chanting and just simply watching the game
    They have adjusted some of the declared sections - 111, 112. 113 & 114 for supporters groups. To get seasons there you would need the groups to facilitate it. If bigger sections were made or relocations happened the assumption would be that TFC would use the existing groups (and possibly newer ones) to populate them.
    Road Trips: July 7 2007 Chicago, July 22nd 2007 Columbus, August 11 2007 NY, October 13 2007 LA, March 29 2008 Columbus, May 24th 2008 DC, May 26 2008 Montreal, June 28th 2008 NE, March 7-11-14 2009 Charleston, March 28 2009 Columbus, April 10 2010 New England, May 12 2010 Montreal, April 7 2012 Montreal, March 16 2013 Montreal , June 3 2014 Montreal, March 14 2015 Columbus

    Twitter: @RPBPhil

  23. #1283
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    They have adjusted some of the declared sections - 111, 112. 113 & 114 for supporters groups. To get seasons there you would need the groups to facilitate it. If bigger sections were made or relocations happened the assumption would be that TFC would use the existing groups (and possibly newer ones) to populate them.

    out of curiosity - is it common in other countries that there are a myriad of supporter groups? i always get the feeling that they are aligned - maybe it simply sounds that way as the teams have been around for decades - anyway just wondering.

  24. #1284
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah there defiantly should be more sections where the supporter groups should assign the tickets every year, in that way the sections can be as loudest it can be. Me and my buddy since season one have been at the back of 113 (we used to buy tickets off this random guy who over charged us by so much, we did it for 3 years, finally we said enough was enough) then we used to sneak in North End Elite, and now for the past two seasons we just have season tickets at 106. I used to bring a drum every game and also once got in trouble for bringing a huge "Montreal Merda" flag lol. For the past two years i always wanted to get back in the supporter sections to give my voice and support, but such a hassle to try sneaking in.

  25. #1285
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haddy View Post
    Given the possible timing issues, Councillor Layton and I have discussed holding a meeting of the Exhibition Place Community Liaison Committee in order to get input from the public and hear the concerns of the public. Councillor Layton, Chair of the Community Liaison Committee is proposing a meeting on March 5, 2014 at 7:00 pm at Exhibition Place. Any issues raised by the community can then be reported to the meetings of both the Board and City Council on this matter and fed into the design and planning approval process undertaken by MLSE and City Planning.
    This meeting should be flooded with supporters who oppose the Argos moving to BMO.

  26. #1286
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    SSH 2015 - SEC 111
    Posts
    756
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don;t think city councillors care about the opinions of supporter groups, or the idea that we don;t want the Argos.
    But, Varsity was killed in part due to the community backlash.
    If I lived in Liberty Village, I'd be a bit concerned about the additional dates the Argos would be bringing a big crowd into the neighbourhood. Fact is, the infrastructure isn't there to handle the traffic. For TFC, crowds have been failry light the past 2 seasons, so we kinda forgot what 20,000 people on gameday feels like. Imagine 30?
    If the nieghbourhood mobilized, and even got them to do some feasability/impact assessments, this decision could be delayed long enough that the Pan Am deadline is missed, and make the Argos sweat a bit for their 2017 deadline to leave the dome.
    In any event, I am amazed that they feel this can be accomplished by the Pan Ams. The past 3 football stadium projects in Canada, in Hamilton, Winnipeg and Ottawa have been far from a smooth process. If we're going to get any type of proper stadium, I'd think it would involve more than 1 winter off-season of construction.

  27. #1287
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    t.dot
    Posts
    7,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glaze View Post
    I don;t think city councillors care about the opinions of supporter groups, or the idea that we don;t want the Argos.
    But, Varsity was killed in part due to the community backlash.
    If I lived in Liberty Village, I'd be a bit concerned about the additional dates the Argos would be bringing a big crowd into the neighbourhood. Fact is, the infrastructure isn't there to handle the traffic. For TFC, crowds have been failry light the past 2 seasons, so we kinda forgot what 20,000 people on gameday feels like. Imagine 30?
    If the nieghbourhood mobilized, and even got them to do some feasability/impact assessments, this decision could be delayed long enough that the Pan Am deadline is missed, and make the Argos sweat a bit for their 2017 deadline to leave the dome.
    In any event, I am amazed that they feel this can be accomplished by the Pan Ams. The past 3 football stadium projects in Canada, in Hamilton, Winnipeg and Ottawa have been far from a smooth process. If we're going to get any type of proper stadium, I'd think it would involve more than 1 winter off-season of construction.
    but we can have our voices heard; and they can be loud

  28. #1288
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wherever I Lay my Hat
    Posts
    3,473
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lightbulb

    Let me put this out there before this becomes derails into a protest thread.

    I think that the idea of (RPB sanctioned) supporters crashing a community meeting and behaving politely is a bad idea. If individuals want to voice their opinions in a thoughtful and deliberate manner using logic rather than sentiment to present their points of view calmly and without disturbing/hijacking the meeting format - then all of our interests would be better served.

    Just my opinion, of course. Please holster your flame throwers.

    BTW - I live in Liberty Village.
    "Failure simply isn't an option at this stage. TFC pushed its chips to the middle of the table when it splurged on Bradley and Defoe and reinforced its bet by making savvy acquisitions elsewhere. This collection of players is capable of delivering on the promises made during the close season. There are no more excuses available for TFC. Only success will continue the process of atoning for the past and establishing a higher standard for the future." FOX Sports

  29. #1289
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,201
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think Liberty Village's congestion issues are remotely close to those at Varsity. That doesn't feel like a winning hand.

    I would focus on the numbers.

    The City already gave $10M, and the use of the land, for this stadium. Peddie bragged in his book because it was so great that the City had "already earned back almost $2M on that investment" over 6 years. But to me, that doesn't sound that compelling, and it's hard for me to imagine that this ask will somehow improve the return.

    If MLSE want this, they should pay for it, 100%. Without recourse to subsidies via oddball lending agreements and the like.

    If the Argos won't survive without a public subsidy, let their fans carry the torch for that.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  30. #1290
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    796
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glaze View Post
    If I lived in Liberty Village, I'd be a bit concerned about the additional dates the Argos would be bringing a big crowd into the neighbourhood. Fact is, the infrastructure isn't there to handle the traffic. For TFC, crowds have been failry light the past 2 seasons, so we kinda forgot what 20,000 people on gameday feels like. Imagine 30?
    If the nieghbourhood mobilized, and even got them to do some feasability/impact assessments, this decision could be delayed long enough that the Pan Am deadline is missed, and make the Argos sweat a bit for their 2017 deadline to leave the dome.
    Not gonna fly. The city is trying to bring more life and traffic to the Liberty Village area with big plans for The Ex grounds. A new hotel is already under construction. Plus more restaurants, events and retail. You can be sure your request for assessment has already been done and dusted.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •