View Poll Results: If seating expansion occurs... will we get a supporter/controlled section?

Voters
371. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes... They will finanlly get it

    82 22.10%
  • No.... They will screw this up royally

    213 57.41%
  • hmmm... not sure? how much money will they make from this?

    76 20.49%
Page 80 of 163 FirstFirst ... 307076777879808182838490130 ... LastLast
Results 2,371 to 2,400 of 4872
  1. #2371
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beach_Red View Post
    "Making a major investment to a stadium they don't even own." When you put it like that it just sounds like bad business. And if the CFL field affects TFC at all it seems like really bad business. It seems like it will end up a bad compromise for the sake of not much money stadium-wise.

    More and more I see why the NFL insist on individual owners putting up their own money and not corporate ownership.
    Yeah, I agree this whole thing is stupid, but I think MLSE desperately want to host winter classic for Leafs that they're willing to take a risk on TFC to make things happen. Also, the whole Toronto NFL thing could be another factor (Obviously MLSE wouldn't directly own the team, but they can play a role in other ways).

  2. #2372
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Why would they want to host it every year? Outdoor game is a big deal for MLSE because they can make more money while getting more people who don't normally get the chance to watch Leafs play live to go their games.
    I didn't say they want to host it every year. There will be a certain amount of outdoor games every year and the Leafs won't be able to host one every year.

    And if they are just going to be able to switch regular home games from ACC to BMO, why hasn't Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Philly, Pittsburgh, NYR, Washington done it already?

  3. #2373
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    I didn't say they want to host it every year. There will be a certain amount of outdoor games every year and the Leafs won't be able to host one every year.

    And if they are just going to be able to switch regular home games from ACC to BMO, why hasn't Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Philly, Pittsburgh, NYR, Washington done it already?
    Well those markets can't consistently support their hockey teams like Toronto. That's why those markets can't do it or have potential to do it every year like Leafs.

  4. #2374
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    F5
    Posts
    15,371
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beach_Red View Post
    More and more I see why the NFL insist on individual owners putting up their own money and not corporate ownership.
    Agreed it makes a lot of sense. MLS worries me with who they are accepting into the ownership club, it's just as bad as the NHL.

  5. #2375
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Well those markets can't consistently support their hockey teams like Toronto. That's why those markets can't do it or have potential to do it every year like Leafs.
    So your saying that Chicago, who have had 200+ consecutive sellouts and 11,000 on their season ticket waitlist, couldn't sustain a game or 2 every year in Wrigley Field?

  6. #2376
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    So your saying that Chicago, who have had 200+ consecutive sellouts and 11,000 on their season ticket waitlist, couldn't sustain a game or 2 every year in Wrigley Field?
    Well they're doing well because they're winning games now. If you look before they started to win, Hawks were in decline and had lost interest in their market.

    Toronto Maple Leafs proven win or lose, they still get support in their market.

  7. #2377
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Well they're doing well because they're winning games now. If you look before they started to win, Hawks were in decline and had lost interest in their market.

    Toronto Maple Leafs proven win or lose, they still get support in their market.
    Well then while they are still good and in demand, why havent they done it already? I mean it's not like they have to wait for a venue , there are 3 already waiting in the city.

    Why haven't they taken advantage of it? Why hasn't Boston? Why didn't Minnestoa during their 400 game sell out streak from 2002-2009?

    Maybe because the NHL won't let them and it's not as simple as saying "we have a venue for outdoor game, we are going to host multiple ones a year. kthnxbye"

    Just because MLSE will have access to a venue that they can host outdoor games does not equal them being able to host multiple ones every year.

    That's all I'm saying. There are far more factors at work here then Tim L calling Bettman and woosh the Leafs can host as many outdoor games as they want.

  8. #2378
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South End
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    Well they're doing well because they're winning games now. If you look before they started to win, Hawks were in decline and had lost interest in their market.

    Toronto Maple Leafs proven win or lose, they still get support in their market.
    And at any price........

  9. #2379
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    Well then while they are still good and in demand, why havent they done it already? I mean it's not like they have to wait for a venue , there are 3 already waiting in the city.

    Why haven't they taken advantage of it? Why hasn't Boston? Why didn't Minnestoa during their 400 game sell out streak from 2002-2009?

    Maybe because the NHL won't let them and it's not as simple as saying "we have a venue for outdoor game, we are going to host multiple ones a year. kthnxbye"

    Just because MLSE will have access to a venue that they can host outdoor games does not equal them being able to host multiple ones every year.

    That's all I'm saying. There are far more factors at work here then Tim L calling Bettman and woosh the Leafs can host as many outdoor games as they want.
    If those teams attempted to do that every year, then your argument is valid. But however, Maple Leaf is different case because market is strong enough to do it every year if they wanted to. NHL isn't going to stop Maple Leafs and hold them back if Maple Leafs want to make it annually thing. NHL and NBC are being conservative and don't want to kill outdoor games so I can see them limited other teams to make it special event in USA, but Toronto is completely different market and don't have to care about NBC and their views.

  10. #2380
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,203
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Without getting into a nuanced "why Seattle is different" conversation .... I don't think Toronto can support 40K for TFC on a consistent basis unless MLS changes (ie improves) a lot.

    The league is not close to there, for this market.

    Today's discussion is blowing the doors off in terms of quality btw. Many many interesting things being said. Too many to respond to!
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  11. #2381
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rowjimi View Post
    And at any price........
    Reason why NHL wouldn't stop Maple Leafs if they wanted to do winter classic game every year. There's a lot of money to make off from Leafs winter classic in Toronto.

  12. #2382
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,451
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post

    If TL believes TFC can get 30K people to their games, then so be it. As a fan, I support higher capacity BMO field simply because MLSE wouldn't jack up ticket prices like they would with smaller BMO field.
    You are making a HUGE assumption. TFC already jacked the price of North End seats by 19% over the last two years and that was prior to this year with attendance on the decline.

    If TFC becomes corporately fashionable, then who do you think they are going to approach with their tickets? Corporations pay a lot more for seats than you or I… well you now as I got off that train as it didn't make economic sense.

    As for the 30k number, I appreciate that you are dreamer. So, I'll let you dream.

    I simply don't see it as a sustainable number. Toronto, though maybe not LA, also doesn't support "minor league" clubs. Hockey town or Leafs town is the old debate. If hockey town, the Marlies would sell out and OHL teams would do well. They don't.

    MLS is viewed by many as a lower league relative to the EPL. Jermain Defoe isn't going to change that. If Toronto supported "soccer" in general, the National Team wouldn't draw 2-3x less than a friendly between United and Celtic.
    Last edited by Pookie; 03-25-2014 at 01:17 PM.

  13. #2383
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    11,699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ensco View Post
    Without getting into a nuanced "why Seattle is different" conversation .... I don't think Toronto can support 40K for TFC on a consistent basis unless MLS changes (ie improves) a lot.

    The league is not close to there.

    Today's discussion is blowing the doors off in terms of quality btw. Many many interesting things being said. Too many to respond to!
    I agree, 40,000 is out of the question on a regular basis. However, 30,000 is an attainable goal if this team is consistently competitive and the pricing structure throughout the stadium is reasonable. The additional upper bowl seating that is planned for BMO Field should theoretically be less expensive than most sections of the existing lower levels, so affordability and value shouldn't be a concern.

  14. #2384
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,451
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post

    Toronto Maple Leafs proven win or lose, they still get support in their market.
    The one major nuance to that though is that many that support the Leafs through season tickets actually have purchased Personal Seat Licenses. If they fail to renew their season seats, they lose the license. These licenses aren't cheap either, 5 to 6 figures.

    Folks that have season seats keep them, largely because they are "locked in." Win or lose.

  15. #2385
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFC07 View Post
    If those teams attempted to do that every year, then your argument is valid. But however, Maple Leaf is different case because market is strong enough to do it every year if they wanted to. NHL isn't going to stop Maple Leafs and hold them back if Maple Leafs want to make it annually thing. NHL and NBC are being conservative and don't want to kill outdoor games so I can see them limited other teams to make it special event in USA, but Toronto is completely different market and don't have to care about NBC and their views.
    The NHL is made up of 30 teams. 30 representives on the board of governers. 30 different owners. The vast majority are rich, successful and have the egos to match.

    I'm highly highly skeptical that MLSE will be able to make that fly with them.

  16. #2386
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 110 Row 24
    Posts
    7,291
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not a conspiracy kind of guy like some on the boards, but this whole push for stadium expansion is for the Winter Classic.

    TL gets pretty gitty when he speaks about bringing it to Toronto. He wants to make a statement with the Winter Classic in Toronto. It will change how this thing is done from here on in.

    TL wants to make it a spectacle. He has the empty CNE grounds sitting there doing nothing. He wants to make a whole area a Winter classic mecca for that weekend leading up to the game with a concert, Marlie game, activities etc.

    If it's successful, and he can figure out how to do one every year, he has just figured out a way to get the CNE grounds lively and useful in the dead of winter.

    The Stadium expansion is icing on the cake for his TFC project and it leads right into the next phase of his job - the Leafs.

    Fixing the Raptors is last on his radar

  17. #2387
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,203
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    The NHL is made up of 30 teams. 30 representives on the board of governers. 30 different owners. The vast majority are rich, successful and have the egos to match.

    I'm highly highly skeptical that MLSE will be able to make that fly with them.
    I am convinced that Leiweke's remit is to smash that arrangement to smithereens. I am convinced this is what got Burke fired, he was a complete and vociferous toady to the league hierarchy.

    The days where Nashville and Columbus have the same vote as MLSE are over.

    The Leafs owners just paid $7 billion for the team and the TV rights. Think about that.

    The Leafs will do what they effing feel like. If the owners want a war, they can read up on what happened with the Big 5 and the Football League in England in 1991.
    Last edited by ensco; 03-25-2014 at 01:23 PM.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  18. #2388
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 119
    Posts
    11,699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    You are making a HUGE assumption. TFC already jacked the price of North End seats by 19% over the last two years and that was prior to this year with attendance on the decline.

    If TFC becomes corporately fashionable, then who do you think they are going to approach with their tickets?

    As for the 30k number, I appreciate that you are dreamer. So, I'll let you dream.

    I simply don't see it as a sustainable number. Toronto, though maybe not LA, also doesn't support "minor league" clubs. Hockey town or Leafs town is the old debate. If hockey town, the Marlies would sell out and OHL teams would do well. They don't.

    MLS is viewed by many as a lower league relative to the EPL. Jermain Defoe isn't going to change that. If Toronto supported "soccer" in general, the National Team wouldn't draw 2-3x less than a friendly between United and Celtic.
    You are underestimating this marketplace.

    MLS is the premier football league in the USA and Canada, so it is the highest level of football available to us in terms of supporting a domestic club. Yes, there are Euro snobs that will not take MLS seriously in this city, but there are also an increasing number of hardcore football fans and casual fans that are starting to take notice of TFC as a result of the remarkable off season that has transpired. If that translates to success on the pitch moving forward, it won't be difficult to consistently attract an additional 7000-8000 fans to an improved, renovated venue that will still be considered the best deal in town.
    Last edited by ManUtd4ever; 03-25-2014 at 01:36 PM.

  19. #2389
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    We The North
    Posts
    7,042
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    You are making a HUGE assumption. TFC already jacked the price of North End seats by 19% over the last two years and that was prior to this year with attendance on the decline.
    I agree they jack up prices too quickly, but if the demand is there, then they will increase the prices. Since they have sold out their season tickets this season, I guess people are willing to pay those prices.

    As for the 30k number, I appreciate that you are dreamer. So, I'll let you dream. I don't see it as a sustainable number. Toronto, though maybe not LA, also doesn't support "minor league" clubs. MLS is viewed by many as a lower league relative to the EPL. Jermain Defoe isn't going to change that.
    Didn't TFC get 50K people to one of their games? Toronto FC might be consider minor league, but signing players like Defoe and Caser can change that. I already see people who don't normally support TFC suddenly start following them. If you look at their TV ratings, media coverage and ticket sales this year, it's hard not to believe new DP's aren't making an impact.

    If Toronto supported "soccer" in general, the National Team wouldn't draw 2-3x less than a friendly between United and Celtic.
    Apples and oranges. TFC gets better TV ratings than National team now. Problem with national team is that they have been losing for too long so there's bit of apathy from soccer fans in this country (not Toronto alone). However, if you look at women's national team, they sold out quickly last time they played in Toronto while their TV ratings were decent.

  20. #2390
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Section 110 Row 24
    Posts
    7,291
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    As for the 30k number, I appreciate that you are dreamer. So, I'll let you dream.

    I simply don't see it as a sustainable number. Toronto, though maybe not LA, also doesn't support "minor league" clubs. Hockey town or Leafs town is the old debate. If hockey town, the Marlies would sell out and OHL teams would do well. They don't.

    MLS is viewed by many as a lower league relative to the EPL. Jermain Defoe isn't going to change that. If Toronto supported "soccer" in general, the National Team wouldn't draw 2-3x less than a friendly between United and Celtic.
    I don't 100% agree with this.

    TFC is minor league in the grand world scale of things, but reality is the big boys play too far away for us to touch, so MLS is our local big boys that we support. Minor league in comparison is USL, NASL etc.

    MLS also doesn't conflict with other world leagues that most people watch, so TFC fills the need when there isn't something satisfying the masses.

    30k is sustainable, but unlike the Leafs - TFC needs to compete and play proper football in order for it to last. They are in a minor league so they should be winning all the time. That is how the majority of cities footy fans sees this team.

  21. #2391
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Burlington
    Posts
    4,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ensco View Post
    I am convinced that Leiweke's remit is to smash that arrangement to smithereens. I am convinced this is what got Burke fired, he was a complete and vociferous toady to the league hierarchy.

    The days where Nashville and Columbus have the same vote as MLSE are over.

    The Leafs owners just paid $7 billion for the team and the TV rights. Think about that.

    The Leafs will do what they effing feel like. If the owners want a war, they can read up on what happened with the Big 5 and the Football League in England in 1991.
    When I see TL go after Snider and Jacobs i'll fall into that thinking. Until then...

  22. #2392
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,247
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Whoop View Post
    The Leafs have been lobbying for a game for years too but they've never had the facility for it. Soon they will.
    The Leafs will get the 2017 or 2018 Winter Classic , whichever is their 100th anniversary, regardless of NBC.
    Did Vancouver not have one of the classic games at BC Place, so why not use the dome and sell 60,000 seats?

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  23. #2393
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red CB Toronto View Post
    Did Vancouver not have one of the classic games at BC Place, so why not use the dome and sell 60,000 seats?
    I doubt TL wants to copy the farce that was an indoor "outdoor heritage classic".

  24. #2394
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    11,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    When I see TL go after Snider and Jacobs i'll fall into that thinking. Until then...
    At least the Leafs will finally take a seat at the grown-up table with those guys...

  25. #2395
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,203
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Areathrasher View Post
    When I see TL go after Snider and Jacobs i'll fall into that thinking. Until then...
    Fair comment.

    I'll wager anyone a pint on this, though. The most obvious opportunity in the MLSE empire is to make the Leafs a true super club. Burke's public fight on the cap ran totally counter to that, that's why he had to be taken out.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  26. #2396
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Somewhere, Anywhere.
    Posts
    11,247
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pint View Post
    I doubt TL wants to copy the farce that was an indoor "outdoor heritage classic".
    Why was it a farce?

    Remember The Man, The Legend, The Goal 5-12-07 and All That #9 Left On The Pitch, Thanks For The Memories !!!

  27. #2397
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17,203
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red CB Toronto View Post
    Did Vancouver not have one of the classic games at BC Place, so why not use the dome and sell 60,000 seats?
    Because 50,000 of those seats suck.

    To make this work, you need good sightlines. With proper seats, not bleachers. So that you can consistently charge $200 or more a ticket.

    No existing facility in the world has that capability. You'd need to design it in.
    “What the world needs is more geniuses with humility; there are so few of us left.”

  28. #2398
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red CB Toronto View Post
    Why was it a farce?
    An indoor "outdoor heritage classic" between 2 teams that don't exist anymore.

  29. #2399
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    West Side
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dont see the attendance of the Argos going up if they move to BMO field. I think the lack of offordable parking and NO subway access being why. Right now Argos fans are sparse ....a Downsview park stadium may be the only saviour to an increase sale of tickets. the city needs to do more investigation on what will actually work rather than band aids.



    *added: I see attendance being worse than it is now after the novelty of a different stadium wears out.
    Last edited by gate7; 03-25-2014 at 01:57 PM.

  30. #2400
    RPB Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    116
    Posts
    21,842
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gate7 View Post
    I dont see the attendance of the Argos going up if they move to BMO field. I think the lack of offordable parking and NO subway access being why. Right now Argos fans are sparse ....a Downsview park stadium may be the only saviour to an increase sale of tickets. the city needs to do more investigation on what will actually work rather than band aids.
    Assuming a winning team, put the Argos outside, all bundled together in a smaller space, with a roof and thus noise, and you'll see a loud raucous atmosphere that will appeal to quite a few people.

    25K seems about right.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •