What's with the painted logo on the grass and in the south end? Is this another MLSE lie.
Type: Posts; User: troy1982
What's with the painted logo on the grass and in the south end? Is this another MLSE lie.
Here are highlights of the game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7Cl-8rG2nc
Probably but there were seating and permanent structures then so it will be more open than then
http://nukesoccer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/bmofield-soccerbleachersaerialview.jpg
I still...
There will be no movable or temporary seating in the north end.
we will get an open space at worst or a flat patio at best.
Tim horton field with a roof over 3 ends is what BMO field will look...
You should re-read what i wrote
There will be a roof on 3 sides as opposed to four side in the initial plan
http://i.imgur.com/PeNPAs1.jpg
Here is a reminder of what we were supposed to get:
http://i.imgur.com/zjlKVxx.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/47LBp2z.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/PeNPAs1.jpg
I still rather be looking at this than an empty void
https://soccernightexclusive.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/bmo-field-west-stand.jpg
So no removable north-end stands at all?
Which would really suck that we will not have seats on all sides and look like a shitty stadium with just open space behind goal, and no fans for the players...
Looks like TFC yesterday
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNCgYWwWgAUWK40.jpg:large
https://twitter.com/EmptySeatsPics/status/635183893403070465
So basicly a shittier stadium to allow the Argos in, despite what MLSE was saying 3 months ago and despite the renderings
This marks the first of many downgrades I fare for BMO field.
Loosing an end just makes the stadium a whole lot less intimate to me and the only reason it is being done is to allow the Argos in.