I'd suggest the truth lies between - how about failed significantly?
Type: Posts; User: kwhisperer
I'd suggest the truth lies between - how about failed significantly?
If he doesn't, then both should go.
Interesting numbers.
Is there a number for games without both?
I'd like to think folks would get the difference between making playoffs in fifth and squeaking through in sixth...but you're probably right. The whole situation is very dispiriting.
I'm not getting that sense from the comments - everyone knows beating Orlando, fun as it was, is expected and that we have a LOT to prove against better teams.
He needs game time. He will be much more important than Findley down the stretch.
I'm really bothered we didn't see Herc. He was the only life for the team when he came on the other day and he needs to get minutes with team.
In one sense playoffs would be good enough for this day-one STH in that, if they fail, I can't think of any reason why it would be worth continuing to follow them. For me it would be disastrous....
It does suggest starting Bendik is more about principle and stubbornness than giving the team the best chance to win.
Wouldn't that go for a huge percentage of what is discussed in these forums?
Yes, if true, the Bradley angle is concerning. It's not as if he's doing anything on the field to justify extra influence on the team's direction. More like the opposite.