Originally Posted by
MightyDM
Hasker performed very well for us. On the other hand, Delgado and Beitashour were starters on the best team in MLS history, and Osorio a starter in the playoffs and the best player on the pitch for 60 minutes of the final. Why we feel the need to knock down the skill of these players baffles me, particularly after seeing almost every game in the clubs existence. Of all the midfielders we have had, who would you pick over Delgado and Osorio? Possibly Carl Robinson for a defensive role and Guevara for an offensive one, but that’s about it.
We won the League and the cup, and looked very good doing both. The players that were on the pitch by definition were good. In fact better than good.
Yet some on this board are putting players we have never seen play ahead of proven winners. I don’t get it. They may be good, but I’m with the ones that got us here until proven otherwise. And it will take some proof.