Originally Posted by
Mr. Inbetween
#Goatnardeschi
I know it is meant to be pejorative but I have decided to 'Native Tongue' it as a mischievous term of endearment.
TheGoodson, my advice, let it go. Stop getting too riled.
Section 223 has a viewpoint not shared by you; maybe not many here.
His style and HH's are not for everyone; thank your lucky stars 'Jack Burns'(?) hasn't joined them on this board!
Still, I am not sure that means he has no clue about what he is talking about.
I get Fede is divisive for all sorts of fair reasons. I also think there are valid points to both sides of this acquisition argument.
On this matter, for now, I prefer the possible signing of Fede as a DP; still, I am open to suggestions.
Other than Hoilett, enlignten me. Be reasonable now. I have BSBSed this!
I do not think there are plenty of marquee options with the required cachet; pedigree, experience, potential at that spot.
On a free!
I get the better, more pressing, options at other positions on the field argument.
However, for whatever reason, BB and/or BM may have decided the need to address the right-flank in this manner.
Despite the negative feedback loop issues Doyle outlines that seem to be compounded by back-line performance.
So, as of yesterday, sure, I would love Yarmolenko, take Dembele, consider Di Maria and Callejon.
I'd even go left-field angling and welcome Conner Mahoney.
Who else though? Realistically.
In respect to reasons, it has been addressed and answered... reasonably... by others already.