PDA

View Full Version : Columbus vs Salt Lake!



cementhead
11-05-2009, 08:09 PM
Comments Here!

cementhead
11-05-2009, 08:17 PM
Look Like a big crow in Columbus!

v00d00daddy
11-05-2009, 08:32 PM
i've only found a spanish feed. anyone with an english one?

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:36 PM
http://www.justin.tv/atlbossplaya1105

can somebody merge the 2 threads?

cementhead
11-05-2009, 08:36 PM
1-0 Crew every fast pace game!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 08:38 PM
It took Columbus only 18 minds to pull that goal back. RSL have looked dangerous though.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:39 PM
18 minds? ...is that the combined total in the stands?

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:51 PM
RSL stinks.

2-0

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 08:51 PM
Eat a cock Schelotto.

I bet it's KKKrew in the Cup again.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:53 PM
Omg!!!!!!!!!!!! 2-1!

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 08:53 PM
Morales Bitches!

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:54 PM
it's all gone quiet over there.......

where did all the generic MLS chants go?

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 08:54 PM
this is shaping up to be a cracker of a match

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 08:55 PM
if i'm honest, RSL looked as though they were going to score and they were somewhat unlucky to be down 2-0

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 08:55 PM
so as it stands, the road goal would be enough to send RSL through!

Brooker
11-05-2009, 08:57 PM
if the game stays 2-1, RSL goes through, correct? away goal yes?

not that i think it will stay 2-1, though.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:01 PM
Yes! Penalty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SWEET JUSTICE! FINALLY SOMEBODY OTHER THAN CLB GETS IT!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:01 PM
penalty!!!!!!!!

wzhxvy
11-05-2009, 09:02 PM
Lol Ha Ha Ha

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:02 PM
Dont Miss You Fool!

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 09:02 PM
2-2!

TorCanSoc
11-05-2009, 09:02 PM
C'mon Findley!

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:03 PM
So Columbus Has To Score 2?

TorCanSoc
11-05-2009, 09:03 PM
Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 09:04 PM
Come on RSL win this thing.

cementhead
11-05-2009, 09:04 PM
Oh boy Crew in trouble!End of half 2-2 all!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:05 PM
So Columbus Has To Score 2?

I would assume because of the away goals, but this is MLS so I also would not be surprised if they do not have the away goals rule.

jloome
11-05-2009, 09:06 PM
No, the away goals rule doesn't apply in MLS.

It's extra time, then penalties.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:06 PM
it would be absolutely absurd if Columbus only had to score one to tie up the aggragate.

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:09 PM
Just to clear things up, the away goals rule does not apply in the MLS playoffs. I can confirm this 100%. I think it's actually a pretty reasonable thing to do; the higher seeded team deserves to have as much of an advantage as is possible in a two-legged playoff format. This way, if the tie is drawn on aggregate, the Crew get a chance to win during a half hour or extra time and penalties in front of their home crowd. I think that's fair enough.

deltox
11-05-2009, 09:09 PM
but CLB have to score again or they are done.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:10 PM
No, the away goals rule doesn't apply in MLS.

It's extra time, then penalties.

LMAO....MLS :facepalm:

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:11 PM
what a joke.

kodiakTFC
11-05-2009, 09:11 PM
LMAO....MLS :facepalm:

Agreed, oh god mls.

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:13 PM
In my opinion it would be more of a joke if, after topping the table for most of the season, the Crew could be so easily dismissed in the first round of the playoffs by a team that just crept in, and not be given any tangible advantage for being much better than their opponent over the course of 30 matches. Just because the away goals rule is football orthodoxy elsewhere in the world, it doesn't mean it's the only solution or objectively a better solution or than otherwise.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:13 PM
http://www.sportsposterwarehouse.com/catImages/mickeysoccerosp-1.jpg

Blizzard
11-05-2009, 09:16 PM
Agreed, oh god mls.

If only people could keep score without the need for math skills. :picard:

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:18 PM
In my opinion it would be more of a joke if, after topping the table for most of the season, the Crew could be so easily dismissed in the first round of the playoffs by a team that just crept in, and not be given any tangible advantage for being much better than their opponent over the course of 30 matches. Just because the away goals rule is football orthodoxy elsewhere in the world, it doesn't mean it's the only solution or objectively a better solution or than otherwise.

Their advantage? They got to play a lesser team and the had the opportunity to score on the road first....AND DIDN'T. Then, they got the 2nd leg at HOME and need to score 1 goal....instead they gave up 2. How about the reward for RSL scoring 2 on the road?

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:18 PM
http://www.sportsposterwarehouse.com/catImages/mickeysoccerosp-1.jpg

Is that Don Garber? lol.

Brooker
11-05-2009, 09:21 PM
lol...

actually Garber has bigger ears.

rocker
11-05-2009, 09:23 PM
Their advantage? They got to play a lesser team and the had the opportunity to score on the road first....AND DIDN'T. Then, they got the 2nd leg at HOME and need to score 1 goal....instead they gave up 2. How about the reward for RSL scoring 2 on the road?

why should teams get "rewarded" for scoring on the road. I mean, scoring on the road is already an advantage.. why make it worth more?

i like the current system.. simple.. and if teams don't feel an "incentive" to score on the road, well, that's balanced by the desire of the home team to score at home.. so they better try to score on the road.

TorCanSoc
11-05-2009, 09:24 PM
I think the statement is, "there is no 12'th man advantage" in MLS. Which is correct. Did New England have an advantage playing at home with 7,000 fans in that cavernous stadium? Its MLS folks, lets not bite the hand that spanks us. :)

werewolf
11-05-2009, 09:25 PM
away goals is the worst thing to plague modern-football since they removal of the Golden Goal.

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:28 PM
I say if there must be playoffs at all (and for a number of reasons there must) then the higher seed should be given every possible advantage. Otherwise the regular season becomes meaningless and the quality of play suffers.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:28 PM
why should teams get "rewarded" for scoring on the road. I mean, scoring on the road is already an advantage.. why make it worth more?

i like the current system.. simple.. and if teams don't feel an "incentive" to score on the road, well, that's balanced by the desire of the home team to score at home.. so they better try to score on the road.

It promotes attacking football. If a team doesn't get an incentive to score away from home, why not just put 11 behind the ball and absorb pressure? Also, I think we'd agree that football crowds provide one of, if not the most intimidating atmosphere in sport. Scoring at a stadium in Turkey for example, should carry a heavier reward.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:32 PM
What is the point in playing legs if away goals aren't rewarded? Why not just play 1 game at the higher seed?

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:37 PM
I imagine over time it would prove to be the case that their are fewer "freak" or shock results with a two leg format, which again - at least theoretically - rewards the stronger teams, and ultimately promotes quality in the league. It also allows more teams to host playoff matches, which is necessary and positive for revenue purposes, but also allows fans in weaker markets to see their clubs play meaningful matches and hopefully become more engaged, having done so.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:38 PM
I imagine over time it would prove to be the case that their are fewer "freak" or shock results with a two leg format, which again - at least theoretically - rewards the stronger teams, and ultimately promotes quality in the league. It also allows more teams to host playoff matches, which is necessary and positive for revenue purposes, but also allows fans in weaker markets to see their clubs play meaningful matches and hopefully become more engaged, having done so.

So, in practical terms....there is no reason.

FluSH
11-05-2009, 09:41 PM
Intense game so far...

Just logged on cause I have to say this:

If anyone had any doubts about us moving up North, you need to look at Columbus and see how they turned around with their supporter area... We need to get all our members together as one unit...

we have outgrown our location and the scalpers seats remain with control in the South...

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:41 PM
I've given you two entirely practical reasons.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:42 PM
RSL is hanging on here...hopefully they can pull this out!

FluSH
11-05-2009, 09:44 PM
In my opinion it would be more of a joke if, after topping the table for most of the season, the Crew could be so easily dismissed in the first round of the playoffs by a team that just crept in

Playoff format... it happens in every league... didn't the NFL favourites get their asses handed by NY Giants two years ago? After winning every game during the regular season...

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:45 PM
wow.....that should have been a goal

werewolf
11-05-2009, 09:45 PM
moglich keit!

that baldguy was ridiculously unmarked, that should have been 3.

thisisinternetclash
11-05-2009, 09:46 PM
Right; and I think, ideally, it shouldn't be like that. There should be real, substantial reward for being six or seven places in the table higher after an entire thirty game season; as much as possible, at least. The higher seeds should win the opening round of the playoffs much more often than not. Obviously every once in a while there would be an upset, but at least at that point it would be a genuine upset, and more weighty and circumstantial due to the rarity of that sort of thing occurring.

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:46 PM
Playoff format... it happens in every league... didn't the NFL favourites get their asses handed by NY Giants two years ago? After winning every game during the regular season...

Exactly....so the away goals rule would benefit more so in the sense that if they scored away as the top seed, it should be tougher for the lower seed, RSL, to score on the road.

werewolf
11-05-2009, 09:48 PM
Gol Gol Gol!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:48 PM
GOAL!!!! That's been coming!!!!!!!!!

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 09:48 PM
OMFG!

werewolf
11-05-2009, 09:49 PM
poor poor goalkeeping.

wzhxvy
11-05-2009, 09:49 PM
check the ball....i think Williams puts vaseline on them

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 09:50 PM
Yo Werewolf I affected your promotion chances with a 2-2 draw. A win and a draw against your very talented squad is an honor to me.

TFC USA
11-05-2009, 09:54 PM
Suck it KKKrew!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:57 PM
Crew Stadium is silent.....AND I FUCKING LOVE IT!!!!!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 09:58 PM
the only thing that could make this better......is if one of those cheerleaders got hit with laser struck ball right in the head

werewolf
11-05-2009, 10:01 PM
Mexico City derby on now, Go Pumas!

cementhead
11-05-2009, 10:01 PM
Boy Tim You Show No love for the crew ever want cheer leader hurt!

Niall
11-05-2009, 10:02 PM
Wooo!!!!! It's all gone quiet over there!!

cementhead
11-05-2009, 10:04 PM
Can you here Columbus sing!

MUFC_Niagara
11-05-2009, 10:06 PM
Boy Tim You Show No love for the crew ever want cheer leader hurt!

LOL...its true!

rocker
11-05-2009, 10:09 PM
F-you columbass!!!

cementhead
11-05-2009, 10:09 PM
3-2rsl!

james
11-05-2009, 10:12 PM
LMAO....MLS :facepalm:

Euro Champions League and UEFA didnt come up with that stupid away goal rule till i think about 2003. And i personally think that was a bad mistake. It makes me mad when one game is 1-1 and the 2nd game is 2-2 and yet just because 1 team scored more goals away they get to move on. That BS when both teams played completely even. I think MLS made the right decision by not following Euro on the stupid away rule and i wish Euro went back to the way it was before.

On another note.......
Columbus are out!!!!! :)

FluSH
11-05-2009, 10:14 PM
Mexico City derby on now, Go Pumas!

haha!

werewolf
11-05-2009, 10:16 PM
Massive!!!

werewolf
11-05-2009, 10:17 PM
haha!

Pumas are out of the Apetura anyway. All that is left for America is seeding in the division, they could take 2nd with a win.

werewolf
11-05-2009, 10:22 PM
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLL!

Dario Veron!

Unmarked header off a corner, that Salt Lake defender should take notes on how to finish.

Chevy
11-05-2009, 10:44 PM
Every time Columbus loses, an Angel gets his wings. :)

GBV
11-05-2009, 11:30 PM
Euro Champions League and UEFA didnt come up with that stupid away goal rule till i think about 2003. And i personally think that was a bad mistake. It makes me mad when one game is 1-1 and the 2nd game is 2-2 and yet just because 1 team scored more goals away they get to move on. That BS when both teams played completely even. I think MLS made the right decision by not following Euro on the stupid away rule and i wish Euro went back to the way it was before.

On another note.......
Columbus are out!!!!! :)

i agree wholeheartedly. the away-goal rule is ridiculous.

TFC_Chris
11-05-2009, 11:45 PM
See you later Columbus!

I LIKE THAT!!

Brooker
11-06-2009, 01:21 AM
loving it.

werewolf
11-06-2009, 01:24 AM
Pumas won 3-2 over America, 90th min penalty to save the win for the home-side after Dario Veron's double was almost blown by a late brace from Cabanas. America still are in the Apetura playoffs though.

Super
11-06-2009, 01:27 AM
I like the away goal rule. It encourages away teams to move forward and play some attacking football. The alternative is that away teams tend to bunker down, hoping for a 0-0 result.

Brooker
11-06-2009, 01:29 AM
C R E............ W...................

Brooker
11-06-2009, 03:57 AM
and as all the bandwagon KKKrew fans abandon ship........

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y84/nirvana123/user1179_pic1311_1234877322.jpg?t=1257497678

MUFC_Niagara
11-06-2009, 06:51 AM
Euro Champions League and UEFA didnt come up with that stupid away goal rule till i think about 2003. And i personally think that was a bad mistake. It makes me mad when one game is 1-1 and the 2nd game is 2-2 and yet just because 1 team scored more goals away they get to move on. That BS when both teams played completely even. I think MLS made the right decision by not following Euro on the stupid away rule and i wish Euro went back to the way it was before.

On another note.......
Columbus are out!!!!! :)

Well, I still disagree and the away goal rule came in in the 90's. But whatever, the crew are out!!!!

GBV
11-06-2009, 07:08 AM
I like the away goal rule. It encourages away teams to move forward and play some attacking football. The alternative is that away teams tend to bunker down, hoping for a 0-0 result.

on the flip side, if an away team goes up 1-0 in game 1, or even ties it 1-1 ... they often put everyone back.

the rule is just arbitrary. a goal is a goal is a goal is a goal.

Pookie
11-06-2009, 08:08 AM
From a format perspective, the whole idea of playoffs is a north american necessity. If Columbus finished on top of the table over the course of a 30 game season, in theory, they should be champs.

RSL was better in 2 games but Columbus proved to be the better team over the season. That said, way to go RSL :)

As far as alternative formats and revenue go, one consideration might be to treat the playoffs like a mini-champions league.

Adopt a group format for the top 8 seeds. Play each other, give the top seeds a home field advantage by allowing the games to be played at the home of the higher seed.

Then the top 2 in each group play each other in a knock out format (you could even make the knock out a best of 3 scenario to appease the North American fan).

Winners play for the Cup (again, could even be a best of 3).

I think a version of that is already being considered...?

ag futbol
11-06-2009, 09:34 AM
i agree wholeheartedly. the away-goal rule is ridiculous.
I second that. It makes for a lot of ugly, overly-tactical play through two legs.

Beach_Red
11-06-2009, 09:44 AM
From a format perspective, the whole idea of playoffs is a north american necessity. If Columbus finished on top of the table over the course of a 30 game season, in theory, they should be champs.



And the playoffs only became an important part of North American sports when there was competition among many sports and a need for a showcase.

Remember, baseball had been a single table (well, two single tables) league with no playoffs, just a pennant winner, for a long time before some newspaper sponsored a series between the champions of each league.

With so many sports competing for viewers (because it's really the TV ratings that drive all this now) every sport needs a period of a few weeks to focus attention.

If soccer can succeed in America witout that showcase, with interest sustained for the entire season in enough cities to make it a big-time league, that'll be great.

BuSaPuNk
11-06-2009, 10:03 AM
CRE....W sorry excuse for a fucking crew!! Clownubus is out what a great day today.

Gazza_55
11-06-2009, 10:12 AM
away goals is the worst thing to plague modern-football since they removal of the Golden Goal.

100% agree with you Werewolf. And I don't worry about teams playing for nil-nil in the MLS playoffs. This is not UEFA where in some competitions you have the Norwegian Champions playing Chelsea. In MLS every team has the same resources. The only nil-nil so far was Seattle v Houston and that was a really good match.

10,109 fans in C-bus last night is a joke. They are defending champs and had a month to sell tickets. Just ridiculous.

Pookie
11-06-2009, 12:36 PM
And the playoffs only became an important part of North American sports when there was competition among many sports and a need for a showcase.

True enough. It explains why the PGA Tour felt the need for a "playoff" format.

What I don't understand is why they went to NASCAR for the blueprints. NASCAR fans and golf fans don't belong to the same country club. I think they would have been better off to develop a format that their fans could relate to. ie. A tournament to seed the top 16 (or whatever) who then advance to match play... which they use in the US Amateur.

MLS, if they are moving to more of a "Champions league" format with a group stage followed by knock out format, is headed in the right direction IMO. Assuming of course that playoffs are necessary.

Whoop
11-06-2009, 01:00 PM
So much for my prediction of Columbus repeating.

I'll take LA Galaxy to win Bob.

TFC RealDeal RPB
11-06-2009, 06:19 PM
Intense game so far...

Just logged on cause I have to say this:

If anyone had any doubts about us moving up North, you need to look at Columbus and see how they turned around with their supporter area... We need to get all our members together as one unit...

we have outgrown our location and the scalpers seats remain with control in the South...


YES YES YES WE NEED T GET IT DONE